Literature DB >> 25581979

Spatter contamination in dental practices--how can it be prevented?

C Graetz1, Jule Bielfeldt, Anica Tillner, Anna Plaumann, C E Dörfer.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Infectious diseases endanger all dental personnel during treatment, especially when spatter and aerosols are produced. Therefore, there is a strong need for better infection control principles during all treatments. The purpose of this in-vitro pilot study was to measure the environmental spatter contamination through a fluorescence technique. Scaling was performed using different power-driven devices and high-volume evacuation combined with a newly developed cannula (PS), standard suction cannulas (STS) and saliva ejectors (CDS).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: One sonic (AIR) and two ultrasonic devices (TIG, VEC) were utilized to remove biofilm from 168 artificial teeth in a manikin head. Teeth were scaled for 120s supra- or subgingivally. The spatter contamination of an area of 1.5m2 around the manikin head was assessed. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSIONS: The contaminated area (%) was significantly different for the AIR (median [25th; 75th percentiles]: 2.5 [1.16; 6.05]) versus TIG (0.25 [0.18; 0.88]) and VEC (0.08 [0.06; 0.1]) (p<0.001). Irrespective of the instrument, subgingival scaling led to a less contaminated area (0.18 [0.07; 1.05]) than supragingival scaling (0.34 [0.1; 2.24]) (p < 0.001). High-volume evacuation combined with STS (0.17 [0.07; 1.04]) and PS (0.18 [0.07; 1.14]) reduced the contamination similarly (p=0.302) and was more effective compared to CDS (1.01 [0.12-5.78]) (p<0.001; p=0.002). Beside the limitation of an in-vitro investigation, it can be conclude that only high-volume evacuation with an adequately calibrated cannula is capable of significantly reducing the amount of spatter contamination produced during power-driven scaling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25581979

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi        ISSN: 0048-7848


  5 in total

1.  Air Quality in a Dental Skills Lab during the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic: Results of an Experimental Study.

Authors:  Christian Graetz; Naomi Sayk; Paulina Düffert; Ralf Heidenreich; Christof E Dörfer; Miriam Cyris
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2022-06-24

2.  The efficacy of an extraoral scavenging device on reducing aerosol particles ≤ 5 µm during dental aerosol-generating procedures: an exploratory pilot study in a university setting.

Authors:  Christian Graetz; Paulina Düffert; Ralf Heidenreich; Miriam Seidel; Christof E Dörfer
Journal:  BDJ Open       Date:  2021-05-20

3.  Interventions to reduce contaminated aerosols produced during dental procedures for preventing infectious diseases.

Authors:  Sumanth Kumbargere Nagraj; Prashanti Eachempati; Martha Paisi; Mona Nasser; Gowri Sivaramakrishnan; Jos H Verbeek
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-10-12

4.  Detection of Visually Imperceptible Blood Contamination in the Oral Surgical Clinic using Forensic Luminol Blood Detection Agent.

Authors:  Raniah Abdullah Al-Eid; Sundar Ramalingam; Chalini Sundar; Mona Aldawsari; Nasser Nooh
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2018-07-18

5.  Aerosol exposure of staff during dental treatments: a model study.

Authors:  Florentina Melzow; Sarah Mertens; Hristo Todorov; David A Groneberg; Sebastian Paris; Alexander Gerber
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 2.757

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.