Literature DB >> 25581805

Deriving and validating a risk estimation tool for screening asymptomatic chlamydia and gonorrhea.

Titilola Falasinnu1, Mark Gilbert, Paul Gustafson, Jean Shoveller.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There has been considerable interest in the development of innovative service delivery modules for prioritizing resources in sexual health delivery in response to dwindling fiscal resources and rising infection rates.
METHODS: This study aims to derive and validate a risk scoring algorithm to accurately identify asymptomatic patients at increased risk for chlamydia and/or gonorrhea infection. We examined the electronic records of patient visits at sexual health clinics in Vancouver, Canada. We derived risk scores from regression coefficients of multivariable logistic regression model using visits between 2000 and 2006. We evaluated the model's discrimination, calibration, and screening performance. Temporal validation was assessed in visits from 2007 to 2012.
RESULTS: The prevalence of infection was 1.8% (n = 10,437) and 2.1% (n = 14,956) in the derivation and validation data sets, respectively. The final model included younger age, nonwhite ethnicity, multiple sexual partners, and previous infection and showed reasonable performance in the derivation (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.74; Hosmer-Lemeshow P = 0.91) and validation (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.64; Hosmer-Lemeshow P = 0.36) data sets. A risk score cutoff point of at least 6 detected 91% and 83% of cases by screening 68% and 68% of the derivation and validation populations, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the use of the algorithm for individualized risk assessment and have important implications for reducing unnecessary screening and saving costs. Specifically, we anticipate that the algorithm has potential uses in alternative settings such as Internet-based testing contexts by facilitating personalized test recommendations, stimulating health care-seeking behavior, and aiding risk communication by increasing sexually transmitted infection risk perception through the creation of tailored risk messages to different groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25581805     DOI: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Transm Dis        ISSN: 0148-5717            Impact factor:   2.830


  6 in total

1.  Assessing association between IWantTheKit risk quiz tool and sexually transmitted infection positivity in male users for sexually transmitted infection screening.

Authors:  Anuj V Patel; Charlotte A Gaydos; Mary Jett-Goheen; Mathilda Barnes; Laura Dize; Perry Barnes; Yu-Hsiang Hsieh
Journal:  Int J STD AIDS       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 1.359

2.  Cost-effectiveness of Sexually Transmitted Infection Screening for Adolescents and Young Adults in the Pediatric Emergency Department.

Authors:  Mark H Eckman; Jennifer L Reed; Maria Trent; Monika K Goyal
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 16.193

3.  Use of a risk quiz to predict infection for sexually transmitted infections: a retrospective analysis of acceptability and positivity.

Authors:  Charlotte A Gaydos; Mary Jett-Goheen; Mathilda Barnes; Laura Dize; Perry Barnes; Yu-Hsiang Hsieh
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.519

4.  Validation of a Clinical Prediction Rule to Predict Asymptomatic Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Infections Among Internet-Based Testers.

Authors:  Aidan Ablona; Titilola Falasinnu; Michael Irvine; Claudia Estcourt; Paul Flowers; Michelle Murti; Oralia Gómez-Ramírez; Christopher K Fairley; Sharmistha Mishra; Ann Burchell; Troy Grennan; Mark Gilbert
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 2.830

5.  Can psychosocial and socio-demographic questions help identify sexual risk among heterosexually-active women of reproductive age? Evidence from Britain's third National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal-3).

Authors:  Natalie Edelman; Jackie A Cassell; Richard de Visser; Philip Prah; Catherine H Mercer
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Protecting our future generation: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial evaluating a sexual health self-care intervention with Native American youth and young adults.

Authors:  Tingey Lauren; Sutcliffe Catherine; Chambers Rachel; Patel Hima; Lee Angelita; Lee Shauntel; Melgar Laura; Slimp Anna; Rompalo Anne; Craig Mariddie; Gaydos Charlotte
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 3.295

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.