Literature DB >> 25581539

Role of transurethral resection of the prostate simulators for training in transurethral surgery.

Sistla Bobby Viswaroop1, Ganesh Gopalakrishnan, Sangampalayam Vedanayagam Kandasami.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Transurethral surgery is an art unique to urologists; mastering the craft is essential for day-to-day practice. Medical treatment along with minimally invasive treatments have significantly reduced the number of transurethral resection of prostates. Decrease in resident's training hours, expanding subspecialties and the emergence of newer technologies have burdened the trainees who are trying to digest the ever-expanding medical literature. Moreover, expectations from patients and insurance companies with a stress on cutting costs and raising litigations have brought changes in apprentice-based to simulator-based training. We studied the role of transurethral resection of prostate simulators in training of transurethral surgery. RECENT
FINDINGS: TURP simulators from bench to virtual reality computer models are available. Most of them have undergone face, content and construct validity. Nontechnical skills training is also important hence simulation to simulator training. Simulation programmes incorporating communication, team building, minimizing errors caused by distraction and managing complex situations can turn a novice into an expert with adequate practice in a stress-free environment. Work is also done to define learning curve, and factors affecting the path to reach the desired goal. Concepts are emerging to integrate simulators and simulation into the existing training programmes.
SUMMARY: TURP simulators are essential for training in transurethral surgery. Low or high-fidelity simulators do not matter, but having a well structured simulation programme, under the scrutiny of a dedicated trained faculty, will address most of the issues related to training in transurethral surgery, an art essential for urologists irrespective of the subspecialty one pursues in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25581539     DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Urol        ISSN: 0963-0643            Impact factor:   2.309


  5 in total

Review 1.  Urological technology: where will we be in 20 years' time?

Authors:  Darryl Ethan Bernstein; Brett Sydney Bernstein
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2018-06-17

2.  A fruit-tissue (apple) based training model for transurethral resection of prostate: face, content and construct validation.

Authors:  Krishnendu Biswas; Shailendra Kumar Gupta; Arvind P Ganpule; Abhijit Patil; Ravindra B Sabnis; Mahesh R Desai
Journal:  Am J Clin Exp Urol       Date:  2020-12-15

3.  Development, implementation, and evaluation of a competency-based didactic and simulation-focused boot camp for incoming urology residents: Report of the first three years.

Authors:  Yuding Wang; Jen Hoogenes; Roderick Clark; Nathan C Wong; Udi Blankstein; Harkanwal Randhawa; Catherine Lovatt; Kevin Kim; Noah Stern; Jeffrey Law; Samir Sami; Michael Uy; Courtney Moore; Bobby Shayegan; Anil Kapoor; Shahid Lambe; Timothy Davies; Sumit Dave; Alp Sener; Edward D Matsumoto
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 4.  Review of the effect of 3D medical printing and virtual reality on urology training with ‘MedTRain3DModsim’ Erasmus + European Union Project

Authors:  İlkan Tatar; Emre Huri; İlker Selçuk; Young Lee Moon; Alberto Paoluzzi; Andreas Skolarikos
Journal:  Turk J Med Sci       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 0.973

Review 5.  How to Implement a Simulation-Based Education Programme: Lessons from the UK Urology Simulation Boot Camp.

Authors:  Helen Please; Chandra Shekhar Biyani
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 0.437

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.