Literature DB >> 25580614

On the factor structure of the Rosenberg (1965) General Self-Esteem Scale.

Guido Alessandri1, Michele Vecchione1, Nancy Eisenberg2, Mariola Łaguna3.   

Abstract

Since its introduction, the Rosenberg General Self-Esteem Scale (RGSE, Rosenberg, 1965) has been 1 of the most widely used measures of global self-esteem. We conducted 4 studies to investigate (a) the goodness-of-fit of a bifactor model positing a general self-esteem (GSE) factor and 2 specific factors grouping positive (MFP) and negative items (MFN) and (b) different kinds of validity of the GSE, MFN, and MFP factors of the RSGE. In the first study (n = 11,028), the fit of the bifactor model was compared with those of 9 alternative models proposed in literature for the RGSE. In Study 2 (n = 357), the external validities of GSE, MFP, and MFN were evaluated using objective grade point average data and multimethod measures of prosociality, aggression, and depression. In Study 3 (n = 565), the across-rater robustness of the bifactor model was evaluated. In Study 4, measurement invariance of the RGSE was further supported across samples in 3 European countries, Serbia (n = 1,010), Poland (n = 699), and Italy (n = 707), and in the United States (n = 1,192). All in all, psychometric findings corroborate the value and the robustness of the bifactor structure and its substantive interpretation. (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25580614     DOI: 10.1037/pas0000073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Assess        ISSN: 1040-3590


  17 in total

1.  Prosocial Bystander Behavior in Bullying Dynamics: Assessing the Impact of Social Capital.

Authors:  Caroline B R Evans; Paul R Smokowski
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2015-08-07

2.  Human Capital Creation: A Collective Psychological, Social, Organizational and Religious Perspective.

Authors:  Ansar Abbas; Dian Ekowati; Fendy Suhariadi; Aisha Anwar
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2022-09-16

3.  Response tendencies due to item wording using eye-tracking methodology accounting for individual differences and item characteristics.

Authors:  Chrystalla C Koutsogiorgi; Michalis P Michaelides
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-01-14

4.  An Empirical Identification Issue of the Bifactor Item Response Theory Model.

Authors:  Wenya Chen; Ken A Fujimoto
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2022-07-10

5.  Positive Orientation-a Common Base for Hedonistic and Eudemonistic Happiness?

Authors:  Piotr Oleś; Tomasz Jankowski
Journal:  Appl Res Qual Life       Date:  2017-02-03

6.  Narcissism and self-esteem: A nomological network analysis.

Authors:  Courtland S Hyatt; Chelsea E Sleep; Joanna Lamkin; Jessica L Maples-Keller; Constantine Sedikides; W Keith Campbell; Joshua D Miller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Are the Results of a Combined Behavioural and Surgical Treatment of Morbid Obesity Satisfactory and Predictable?

Authors:  Per G Farup
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-07-05       Impact factor: 5.717

8.  Developmental Course and Risk Factors of Physical Aggression in Late Adolescence.

Authors:  Marit Henriksen; Marit Skrove; Gry Børmark Hoftun; Erik R Sund; Stian Lydersen; Wan-Ling Tseng; Denis G Sukhodolsky
Journal:  Child Psychiatry Hum Dev       Date:  2021-08

9.  Modeling Wording Effects Does Not Help in Recovering Uncontaminated Person Scores: A Systematic Evaluation With Random Intercept Item Factor Analysis.

Authors:  María Dolores Nieto; Luis Eduardo Garrido; Agustín Martínez-Molina; Francisco José Abad
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-06-02

10.  The effect of guided self-determination on self-management in persons with type 1 diabetes mellitus and HbA1c ≥64 mmol/mol: a group-based randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Jannike Mohn; Marit Graue; Jõrg Assmus; Vibeke Zoffmann; Hrafnkell Thordarson; Mark Peyrot; Berit Rokne
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.