Literature DB >> 25580023

Site specific nematode management-development and success in cotton production in the United States.

C Overstreet1, E C McGawley1, A Khalilian2, T L Kirkpatrick3, W S Monfort2, W Henderson2, J D Mueller2.   

Abstract

Variability in edaphic factors such as clay content, organic matter, and nutrient availability within individual fields is a major obstacle confronting cotton producers. Adaptation of geospatial technologies such global positioning systems (GPS), yield monitors, autosteering, and the automated on-and-off technology required for site-specific nematicide application has provided growers with additional tools for managing nematodes. Multiple trials in several states were conducted to evaluate this technology in cotton. In a field infested with Meloidogyne spp., both shallow (0 to 0.3 m) and deep (0 to 0.91 m) apparent electrical conductivity (ECa) readings were highly correlated with sand content. Populations of Meloidogyne spp. were present when shallow and deep EC values were less than 30 and 90 mS/m, respectively. Across three years of trials in production fields in which verification strips (adjacent nematicide treated and untreated rows across all soil zones) were established to evaluate crop response to nematicide application, deep EC values from 27.4-m wide transects of verification strips were more predictive of yield response to application of 1,3-dichloropropene than were shallow EC values in one location and both ECa values equally effective at predicting responses at the second location. In 2006, yields from entire verification strips across three soil zones in four production fields showed that nematicide response was greatest in areas with the lowest EC values indicating highest content of sand. In 2008 in Ashley and Mississippi Counties, AR, nematicide treatment by soil zone resulted in 36% and 42% reductions in the amount of nematicide applied relative to whole-field application. In 2007 in Bamberg County, SC, there was a strong positive correlation between increasing population densities of Meloidogyne incognita and increasing sand content. Trials conducted during 2007 and 2009 in South Carolina against Hoplolaimus columbus showed a stepwise response to increasing rates of aldicarb in zone 1 but not in zones 2 and 3. Site-specific application of nematicides has been shown to be a viable option for producers as a potential management tool against several nematode pathogens of cotton.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gossypium hirsutum; Hoplolaimus columbus; Meloidogyne incognita; Rotylenchulus reniformis; cotton; management; site-specific; soil texture

Year:  2014        PMID: 25580023      PMCID: PMC4284082     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nematol        ISSN: 0022-300X            Impact factor:   1.402


  20 in total

1.  The future of nematode management in cotton.

Authors:  J L Starr; S R Koenning; T L Kirkpatrick; A F Robinson; P A Roberts; R L Nichols
Journal:  J Nematol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.402

2.  Probability range in damage predictions as related to sampling decisions.

Authors:  H Ferris
Journal:  J Nematol       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 1.402

3.  Two semi-automatic elutriators for extracting nematodes and certain fungi from soil.

Authors:  D W Byrd; K R Barker; H Ferris; C J Nusbaum; W E Griffin; R H Small; C A Stone
Journal:  J Nematol       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 1.402

4.  Spread of Rotylenchulus reniformis in an Arkansas Cotton Field Over a Four-Year Period.

Authors:  W S Monfort; T L Kirkpatrick; A Mauromoustakos
Journal:  J Nematol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.402

5.  Impact of Soil Texture on the Reproductive and Damage Potentials of Rotylenchulus reniformis and Meloidogyne incognita on Cotton.

Authors:  S R Koenning; S A Walters; K R Barker
Journal:  J Nematol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 1.402

6.  Meloidogyne incognita and Rotylenchulus reniformis and Associated Soil Textures from Some Cotton Production Areas of Texas.

Authors:  J L Starr; C M Heald; A F Robinson; R G Smith; J P Krausz
Journal:  J Nematol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 1.402

7.  Variability in Time and Space of Meloidogyne incognita Fall Population Density in Cotton Fields.

Authors:  T A Wheeler; B Baugh; H Kaufman; G Schuster; K Siders
Journal:  J Nematol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.402

8.  The potential for mapping nematode distributions for site-specific management.

Authors:  Dawn Y Wyse-Pester; Lori J Wiles; Philip Westra
Journal:  J Nematol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.402

9.  Management of Root-knot and Reniform Nematodes in Ultra-Narrow Row Cotton with 1,3-Dichloropropene.

Authors:  R A Kinloch; J R Rich
Journal:  J Nematol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.402

10.  Effects of site-specific application of aldicarb on cotton in a meloidogyne incognita-infested field.

Authors:  J A Wrather; W E Stevens; T L Kirkpatrick; N R Kitchen
Journal:  J Nematol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.