Literature DB >> 25579877

Safety, clinical outcome, and fracture rate of femoropopliteal stenting using a 4F compatible delivery system.

H Sarkadi1, V Bérczi2, A Kollár2, D Kiss2, P Jakabfi2, E M Végh1, B Nemes1, B Merkely1, K Hüttl1, E Dósa3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety, clinical outcome, and fracture rate of femoropopliteal interventions using 4F stents.
METHODS: Between January 2010 and December 2011, 112 symptomatic patients were treated by stent implantation. Ten patients were lost to follow up; therefore, 102 patients (62 men; mean age 66.4 ± 10.1 years) were retrospectively analyzed. The indication for femoropopliteal revascularization was severe claudication (Rutherford-Becker score = 3) in 63 (62%) patients and chronic critical limb ischemia (Rutherford-Becker score = 4-6) in 39 (38%). Follow up included palpation of peripheral pulses and measurement of ankle brachial index. In patients with suspected in-stent restenosis duplex ultrasonography was performed. In 2013, patients were asked to return for a fluoroscopic examination of the stents.
RESULTS: 114 lesions (Trans-Atlantic InterSociety Consensus-C and D, n = 45) were treated with 119 stents (Astron Pulsar, n = 42; Pulsar-18, n = 77). Lesions were long (≥100 mm) in 49 cases and heavily calcified in 35. Stents were long (≥120 mm) in 46 cases. Ten stents were partially overlapped. The technical and clinical success rates were 100%. Two puncture related complications were noted, neither of which required surgical repair. Eleven patients died (myocardial infarction, n = 4; stroke, n = 2; cancer, n = 5) and nine patients underwent major amputation (above knee, n = 4). The primary patency rate was 83% at 6 months and 80% at 12 months. The primary assisted patency rate was 97% at 6 months and 94% at 12 months. The secondary patency rate was 86% at 6 months and 85% at 12 months. The prevalence of fractures was 26% (type III and IV, 10%) after an average follow up of 25 months.
CONCLUSION: Femoropopliteal stenting using a 4F compatible delivery system can be accomplished with a low complication rate, acceptable fracture rate, and with similar 12 month patency and revascularization rates as their 6F counterparts.
Copyright © 2014 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  4F stents; Femoropopliteal stenting; In-stent restenosis; Patency; Stent fracture

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25579877     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg        ISSN: 1078-5884            Impact factor:   7.069


  4 in total

1.  Validating Fatigue Safety Factor Calculation Methods for Cardiovascular Stents.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Superficial Femoral Artery Intervention: Creating an Algorithmic Approach for the Use of Old and Novel (Endovascular) Technologies.

Authors:  John H Rundback; Kevin Chaim Herman; Amish Patel
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2015-09

3.  Vascular complications with a plug-based vascular closure device after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Predictors and bail-outs.

Authors:  Maarten P van Wiechen; Herbert Kroon; Thijmen W Hokken; Joris F Ooms; Marjo J de Ronde-Tillmans; Joost Daemen; Peter P de Jaegere; Nicolas M Van Mieghem
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 2.585

Review 4.  Delivery of Antioxidant and Anti-inflammatory Agents for Tissue Engineered Vascular Grafts.

Authors:  Kenyatta S Washington; Chris A Bashur
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 5.810

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.