Literature DB >> 25578377

Tumour size is the only predictive factor of distant recurrence after pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with large operable or locally advanced breast cancers: a sub-study of EORTC 10994/BIG 1-00 phase III trial.

F Fei1, C Messina1, L Slaets2, C Chakiba3, D Cameron4, J Bogaerts2, H Bonnefoi5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Although achieving a pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in breast cancer predicts a better outcome, some patients still relapse. The objectives of this study were to describe the types of events in this group of patients and to identify predictive factors for relapse.
METHODS: Patients with large operable or locally advanced breast cancers (T4d tumours were excluded) were randomised to receive either six cycles of anthracycline-based chemotherapy or three cycles of docetaxel followed by three cycles of eprirubicin/docetaxel. pCR was defined as no evidence of residual invasive cancer (or very few scattered tumour cells) in the primary tumour and axillary lymph nodes at surgery. Two Cox regression analyses were performed to identify predictive factors of relapse: one for recurrence-free interval (RFI) and one for distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI).
RESULTS: Out of 283 eligible patients who achieved a pCR, 40 (14.1%) and 28 (9.9%) presented an event of interest for the RFI and DRFI analyses, respectively. Five-year RFI, DRFI and overall survival (OS) were 85.3% (95% confidence interval (CI), 80.1-89.3), 89.6% (95% CI, 85.0-92.9) and 91.9% (95% CI, 87.2-94.9), respectively. No predictors for RFI after pCR were identified. For DRFI, tumour size was the only predictor: Hazard ratio (HR) T3 versus T1-2=3.62 (95% CI, 1.66-7.89); HR T4 versus T1-2: HR, 2.80 (95% CI, 0.62-12.64) p=0.0048.
CONCLUSION: In this study, clinical tumour size emerged as the only predictor for DRFI after pCR, with T3 and T4 tumours having an increased risk for distant recurrence compared to T1-2 tumours.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Pathological complete response

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25578377     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.11.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  9 in total

1.  Perspective on the interpretation of research and translation to clinical care with therapy-associated metastatic breast cancer progression as an example.

Authors:  Barbara Fingleton; Kelly Lange; Beth Caldwell; Katherine V Bankaitis
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 5.150

2.  Better overall survival in patients who achieve pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer in a Chilean public hospital.

Authors:  Francisco Acevedo; Militza Petric; Benjamin Walbaum; Julieta Robin; Luisa Legorburu; Geraldine Murature; Constanza Guerra; Marisel Navarro; María José Canovas; Cesar Sanchez; Lorena Vargas; Manuel Manzor; José Peña; Sabrina Muñiz; Paulina Veglia; Raúl Cartes; Raúl Martinez
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2021-02-11

3.  Comparison of strain and shear-wave ultrasounic elastography in predicting the pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancers.

Authors:  Yan Ma; Shuo Zhang; Jing Li; Jianyi Li; Ye Kang; Weidong Ren
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Cytoplasmic Cyclin E Expression Predicts for Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Cansu Karakas; Ashleigh M Francis; Min Jin Ha; Hannah F Wingate; Richard A Meena; Min Yi; Komal S Rasaputra; Angelica M Gutierrez Barrera; Banu Arun; Kim-Anh Do; Aysegul Sahin; Khandan Keyomarsi; Kelly K Hunt
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 13.787

5.  Pathological complete response and prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for HER2-positive breast cancers before and after trastuzumab era: results from a real-life cohort.

Authors:  Anne-Sophie Hamy; Lisa Belin; Hélène Bonsang-Kitzis; Caroline Paquet; Jean-Yves Pierga; Florence Lerebours; Paul Cottu; Roman Rouzier; Alexia Savignoni; Marick Lae; Fabien Reyal
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Correlation analysis between molecular subtypes and Nottingham Prognostic Index in breast cancer.

Authors:  Hongchao Zhen; Liuting Yang; Li Li; Junxian Yu; Lei Zhao; Yingying Li; Qin Li
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-05-27

7.  Preoperative [18]fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography in early stage breast cancer: Rates of distant metastases.

Authors:  Vincent Vinh-Hung; Hendrik Everaert; Karim Farid; Navid Djassemi; Jacqueline Baudin-Veronique; Stefanos Bougas; Yuriy Michailovich; Clarisse Joachim-Contaret; Elsa Cécilia-Joseph; Claire Verschraegen; Nam P Nguyen
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2017-07-28

8.  Markers Associated With Tumor Recurrence in Patients With Breast Cancer Achieving a Pathologic Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Li-Yun Xie; Kun Wang; Hai-Lu Chen; Yan-Xia Shi; Yuan-Qi Zhang; Hao-Yu Lin; Yuan-Ke Liang; Ying-Sheng Xiao; Zhi-Yong Wu; Zhong-Yu Yuan; Si-Qi Qiu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 5.738

9.  Complications and local relapse after intraoperative low-voltage X-ray radiotherapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  Ana Alicia Tejera Hernández; Víctor Manuel Vega Benítez; Juan Carlos Rocca Cardenas; Neith Ortega Pérez; Nieves Rodriguez Ibarria; Juan Carlos Díaz Chico; Juan José García-Granados Alayón; Pedro Pérez Correa; Juan Ramón Hernández Hernández
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 1.766

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.