Literature DB >> 25578146

The risk-stratified osteoporosis strategy evaluation study (ROSE): a randomized prospective population-based study. Design and baseline characteristics.

Katrine Hass Rubin1, Teresa Holmberg, Mette Juel Rothmann, Mikkel Høiberg, Reinhard Barkmann, Jeppe Gram, Anne Pernille Hermann, Mickael Bech, Ole Rasmussen, Claus C Glüer, Kim Brixen.   

Abstract

The risk-stratified osteoporosis strategy evaluation study (ROSE) is a randomized prospective population-based study investigating the effectiveness of a two-step screening program for osteoporosis in women. This paper reports the study design and baseline characteristics of the study population. 35,000 women aged 65-80 years were selected at random from the population in the Region of Southern Denmark and-before inclusion-randomized to either a screening group or a control group. As first step, a self-administered questionnaire regarding risk factors for osteoporosis based on FRAX(®) was issued to both groups. As second step, subjects in the screening group with a 10-year probability of major osteoporotic fractures ≥15% were offered a DXA scan. Patients diagnosed with osteoporosis from the DXA scan were advised to see their GP and discuss pharmaceutical treatment according to Danish National guidelines. The primary outcome is incident clinical fractures as evaluated through annual follow-up using the Danish National Patient Registry. The secondary outcomes are cost-effectiveness, participation rate, and patient preferences. 20,904 (60%) women participated and included in the baseline analyses (10,411 in screening and 10,949 in control group). The mean age was 71 years. As expected by randomization, the screening and control groups had similar baseline characteristics. Screening for osteoporosis is at present not evidence based according to the WHO screening criteria. The ROSE study is expected to provide knowledge of the effectiveness of a screening strategy that may be implemented in health care systems to prevent fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25578146     DOI: 10.1007/s00223-014-9950-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  8 in total

1.  Self-perceived facture risk: factors underlying women's perception of risk for osteoporotic fractures: the Risk-Stratified Osteoporosis Strategy Evaluation study (ROSE).

Authors:  M J Rothmann; J Ammentorp; M Bech; J Gram; O W Rasmussen; R Barkmann; C C Glüer; A P Hermann
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Non-participation in systematic screening for osteoporosis-the ROSE trial.

Authors:  M J Rothmann; S Möller; T Holmberg; M Højberg; J Gram; M Bech; K Brixen; A P Hermann; C-C Glüer; R Barkmann; K H Rubin
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Linkage of clinical trial and administrative data: a survey of cancer patient preferences.

Authors:  A E Hay; Y W Leung; J L Pater; M C Brown; E Bell; D Howell; Z Kassam; S Willing; C Tian; G Liu
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Use of antiosteoporotic medication in the Danish ROSE population-based screening study.

Authors:  M P Høiberg; K H Rubin; T Holmberg; M J Rothmann; S Möller; J Gram; M Bech; K Brixen; A P Hermann
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Is it time to consider population screening for fracture risk in postmenopausal women? A position paper from the International Osteoporosis Foundation Epidemiology/Quality of Life Working Group.

Authors:  P Chotiyarnwong; E V McCloskey; N C Harvey; M Lorentzon; D Prieto-Alhambra; B Abrahamsen; J D Adachi; F Borgström; O Bruyere; J J Carey; P Clark; C Cooper; E M Curtis; E Dennison; M Diaz-Curiel; H P Dimai; D Grigorie; M Hiligsmann; P Khashayar; E M Lewiecki; P Lips; R S Lorenc; S Ortolani; A Papaioannou; S Silverman; M Sosa; P Szulc; K A Ward; N Yoshimura; J A Kanis
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 2.879

6.  Primary screening for increased fracture risk by the FRAX® questionnaire-uptake rates in relation to invitation method.

Authors:  Louise M E Moberg; Peter M Nilsson; Anna H Holmberg; Göran Samsioe; Christer Borgfeldt
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 2.617

Review 7.  Osteoporosis case ascertainment strategies in European and Asian countries: a comparative review.

Authors:  A M Burden; Y Tanaka; L Xu; Y-C Ha; E McCloskey; S R Cummings; C C Glüer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Reliability of a Risk-Factor Questionnaire for Osteoporosis: A Primary Care Survey Study with Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Ground Truth.

Authors:  Maria Radeva; Dorothee Predel; Sven Winzler; Ulf Teichgräber; Alexander Pfeil; Ansgar Malich; Ismini Papageorgiou
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.