Literature DB >> 25577836

[Comparison of ultrasound-guided transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsies in clinical application].

Li-rong Yuan1, Cheng-guang Zhang, Lai-xing Lu, Lei Ruan, Jian-hong Lan, Sen-qiang Feng, Jin-dan Luo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the positive rates and complications of ultrasound-guided transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsies.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 156 cases of ultrasound-guided transrectal (n = 97) and transperineal (n = 59) prostate biopsy, and compared the positive rate and post-biopsy complications between the two approaches.
RESULTS: The positive rates in the transrectal and transperineal groups were 48.4% and 44.1%, respectively, with no significant difference between the two approaches according to different PSA levels (P >0.05). No statistically significant differences were observed between the transrectal and transperineal groups in the post-biopsy incidence rates of such complications as hematuria (54.6% vs 42.4%, P >0.05), lower urinary tract symptoms (17.5% vs 22.0%, P >0.05), dysuria (9.3% vs 6.8%, P >0.05), and acute urinary retention (7.2% vs 6.8%, P >0.05). However, the incidence rates of post-biopsy infection and rectal bleeding were remarkably higher (15.5% vs 3.4%, P<0.05 and 50.5% vs 3.4%, P >0.01) while that of perineal swelling markedly lower in the former than in the latter (3.1% vs 13.6%, P <0.05).
CONCLUSION: Transrectal and transperineal biopsies are both effective for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Since their complications vary, the choice between the two methods depends on the specific condition of the patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25577836

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue        ISSN: 1009-3591


  4 in total

Review 1.  The management of rectal bleeding following transrectal prostate biopsy: A review of the current literature.

Authors:  Mark R Quinlan; Damien Bolton; Rowan G Casey
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Comparison between transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy for detection of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

Authors:  Jianxin Xue; Zhiqiang Qin; Hongzhou Cai; Chuanjie Zhang; Xiao Li; Weizhang Xu; Jingyuan Wang; Zicheng Xu; Bin Yu; Ting Xu; Qin Zou
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-04-04

3.  Transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jianjian Xiang; Huaqing Yan; Jiangfeng Li; Xiao Wang; Hong Chen; Xiangyi Zheng
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 2.754

4.  Clinical Trial Protocol for PERFECT: A Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing the Efficiency and Tolerance of Transperineal Fusion Versus Transrectal Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsies (CCAFU-PR1 Study).

Authors:  Alae Touzani; Gaëlle Fiard; Eric Barret; Raphaële Renard-Penna; Ambroise Salin; Benjamin Pradère; François Rozet; Jean-Baptiste Beauval; Bernard Malavaud; Gianluca Giannarini; Pierre Colin; Morgan Rouprêt; Guillaume Ploussard
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2022-10-05
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.