Literature DB >> 25577457

Mesial inclination of impacted third molars and its propensity to stimulate external root resorption in second molars--a cone-beam computed tomographic evaluation.

Anne Caroline Costa Oenning1, Saulo Leonardo Sousa Melo2, Francisco Carlos Groppo3, Francisco Haiter-Neto4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the presence of external root resorption (ERR) in second molars adjacent to horizontally and mesioangular impacted mandibular third molars by cone-beam computed tomography. In addition, patient characteristics (age and gender) and third molar depth were correlated with the presence of ERR.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The sample consisted of 116 scans (58 acquired on the i-CAT Classic and 58 on the Picasso-Trio) of 70 women and 46 men (mean age, 23.7 yr). Two observers recorded the presence of ERR in the second molars, inclination and depth of third molars in relation to bone and soft tissues, third molars classification according to Pell and Gregory, and location and severity of ERR. Data were analyzed by analysis of variance, Mann-Whitney test, and χ(2) test. The κ test was used to analyze intraobserver agreement.
RESULTS: The overall prevalence of ERR was 49.43%. There were no statistically significant differences in the detection of ERR by gender, images from the 2 devices, or third molar inclination (P > .05). The κ test showed excellent reproducibility values (κ = 0.7778). There was a smaller proportion of affected patients 14 to 24 years old and ERR in teeth adjacent to Class C third molars.
CONCLUSION: Mesially inclined third molars (mesioangular and horizontal) have a greater potential of being associated with ERR in second molars, which was shown by the high prevalence of the condition in the overall sample. Class A and B third molars in patients older than 24 years were more associated with the presence of ERR in adjacent teeth.
Copyright © 2015 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25577457     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2014.10.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  12 in total

1.  Surgical removal versus retention for the management of asymptomatic disease-free impacted wisdom teeth.

Authors:  Hossein Ghaeminia; Marloes El Nienhuijs; Verena Toedtling; John Perry; Marcia Tummers; Theo Jm Hoppenreijs; Wil Jm Van der Sanden; Theodorus G Mettes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-05-04

2.  External root resorption of the second molar associated with mesially and horizontally impacted mandibular third molar: evidence from cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Dongmiao Wang; Xiaotong He; Yanling Wang; Zhongwu Li; Yumin Zhu; Chao Sun; Jinhai Ye; Hongbing Jiang; Jie Cheng
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-06-18       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Radiographic signs of pathology determining removal of an impacted mandibular third molar assessed in a panoramic image or CBCT.

Authors:  Louise H Matzen; Lars Schropp; Rubens Spin-Neto; Ann Wenzel
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Resorptive potential of impacted mandibular third molars: 3D simulation by finite element analysis.

Authors:  Anne Caroline Oenning; Alexandre Rodrigues Freire; Ana Cláudia Rossi; Felippe Bevilacqua Prado; Paulo Henrique Ferreira Caria; Lourenço Correr-Sobrinho; Francisco Haiter-Neto
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-03-10       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Marginal bone loss and resorption of second molars related to maxillary third molars in panoramic images compared with CBCT.

Authors:  Louise Hermann; Ann Wenzel; Lars Schropp; Louise Hauge Matzen
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Variations in the buccal-lingual alveolar bone thickness of impacted mandibular third molar: our classification and treatment perspectives.

Authors:  Jing Ge; Jia-Wei Zheng; Chi Yang; Wen-Tao Qian
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Clinician-related factors behind the decision to extract an asymptomatic lower third molar. A cross-sectional study based on Spanish and Portuguese dentists.

Authors:  D Alves-Pereira; D Pereira-Silva; R Figueiredo; C Gay-Escoda; E Valmaseda-Castellón
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2017-09-01

8.  Impacted lower third molars and distal caries in the mandibular second molar. Is prophylactic removal of lower third molars justified?

Authors:  José Marques; Marta Montserrat-Bosch; Rui Figueiredo; Miguel-Angel Vilchez-Pérez; Eduard Valmaseda-Castellón; Cosme Gay-Escoda
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2017-06-01

9.  Radiographic Position of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars and Their Association with Pathological Conditions.

Authors:  Zahra Haddad; Mansour Khorasani; Mahin Bakhshi; Maryam Tofangchiha; Zeynab Shalli
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2021-03-24

10.  Tridimensional assessment of the dental follicle dimensions of impacted mandibular third molars using cone-beam CT.

Authors:  Marlene Barroso; Luis-Ernesto Arriola-Guillén; Yalil-Augusto Rodríguez-Cárdenas; Gustavo-Armando Ruíz-Mora; Maria-Eugenia Guerrero; Carlos Flores-Mir
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2018-08-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.