Literature DB >> 25577288

The association of BMI and social distance towards obese individuals is mediated by sympathy and understanding.

Claudia Sikorski1, Melanie Luppa2, Matthias C Angermeyer3, Georg Schomerus4, Bruce Link5, Steffi G Riedel-Heller2.   

Abstract

The desire for social distance towards individuals with obesity as part of the stigmatization process has not been investigated. The aims of this study include: (a) determining the prevalence of social distance and its domains in a population-based sample; (b) reporting levels of emotional response; and (c) investigating the association of BMI, emotional response and social distance. The data were derived from a large population based telephone survey in Germany (total n = 3,003, this sub-sample n = 1008). Emotional response to individuals with obesity was assessed for the emotions discomfort, pity, insecurity, amusement, sympathy, help and incomprehension (5-point Likert scale). Social distance was measured on a 5-point Likert scale covering different areas of social interaction. This served as the dependent variable for a linear regression model and mediation models that included BMI and emotional response. Social distance was highest for job recommendation, introduction to a friend, someone with obesity marrying into the family and renting out a room. Means of emotional responses were highest for pity (Mean = 2.58), sympathy (Mean = 2.87) and wanting to help (M = 2.76). In regression analyses, incomprehension (b = 1.095, p < 0.001) and sympathy (b = -0.833, p < 0.001) and the respondents' own BMI (b = -0.145, p < 0.001) were significantly associated to the overall amount of social distance. Mediation models revealed a significant mediation effect of BMI through sympathy (b = -0.229, % of total effect through mediation = 10.3%) and through incomprehension (b = -0.057, % of total effect through mediation = 27.5%) on social distance. Social distance towards individuals with obesity is prevalent in the general public in Germany and it is associated with emotional responses. Altering the emotional responses may, therefore, be a starting point in anti-stigma interventions. Evoking sympathy and lowering incomprehension may result in lower overall social distance.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Emotional response; Obesity; Social distance; Stigma

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25577288     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  6 in total

1.  Overweight and Lonely? A Representative Study on Loneliness in Obese People and Its Determinants.

Authors:  Franziska U Jung; Claudia Luck-Sikorski
Journal:  Obes Facts       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 3.942

Review 2.  The role of social networks in the development of overweight and obesity among adults: a scoping review.

Authors:  Katie Powell; John Wilcox; Angie Clonan; Paul Bissell; Louise Preston; Marian Peacock; Michelle Holdsworth
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Moralized Health-Related Persuasion Undermines Social Cohesion.

Authors:  Susanne Täuber
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-06-12

4.  Out of the silos: identifying cross-cutting features of health-related stigma to advance measurement and intervention.

Authors:  Wim H van Brakel; Janine Cataldo; Sandeep Grover; Brandon A Kohrt; Laura Nyblade; Melissa Stockton; Edwin Wouters; Lawrence H Yang
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 8.775

5.  Social deprivation, gender and obesity: multiple stigma? Results of a population survey from Germany.

Authors:  Anna Christin Makowski; Tae Jun Kim; Claudia Luck-Sikorski; Olaf von dem Knesebeck
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Social isolation enhances cued-reinstatement of sucrose and nicotine seeking, but this is reversed by a return to social housing.

Authors:  Natalie A Mastrogiovanni; Alice K Wheeler; Kelly J Clemens
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 4.996

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.