G Ening1, F Osterheld, D Capper, K Schmieder, C Brenke. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Knappschafts-Krankenhaus Bochum-Langendreer, Ruhr-University of Bochum, In der Schornau 23-25, 44892, Bochum, Germany, genevieve.ening@gmail.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Dismal glioblastoma (GB) patient outcome calls for the elucidation of further reliable predictors of prognosis. Established "biomarkers," age and functional status, employed in today's patient stratification have limits in fingerprinting this heterogeneous tumor entity. We aimed at ascertaining additional prognostic factors that may facilitate patient stratification for surgery. METHODS: A retrospective review of 233 consecutive adult patients operated on for newly diagnosed GB at a single tertiary institution over a 5-year period (2006-2011) was conducted. Modern defined outcome associating factors recorded included demographics (preoperative age, gender, signs, symptoms, comorbidity status quantified by the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), functional status computed by the Karnofsky performance scale (KPS)), tumor characteristics (size, location, isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation, and O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation status), and treatment parameters (volumetrically quantified extent of resection and adjuvant therapy). Survival analysis was performed by the Kaplan-Maier method. Influence of variables was evaluated using log-rank test. RESULTS: Median neuroradiographic evidence of tumor progression was 6 months after surgery (range 0-72). The median overall survival was 9.5 months (range 0-72). Age > 65 years, KPS ≤ 70, and CCI > 3 were significantly associated with both poor OS (each p < 0.0001) and PFS (p < 0.0001, p < 0.001 and p < 0.002), respectively. Also, patients older than 65 years significantly had a CCI > 3 (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our data evidence that aside established prognostic parameters (age and KPS) for GB patient outcome, the CCI additionally significantly impacts outcome and may be employed for preoperative patient stratification.
PURPOSE: Dismal glioblastoma (GB) patient outcome calls for the elucidation of further reliable predictors of prognosis. Established "biomarkers," age and functional status, employed in today's patient stratification have limits in fingerprinting this heterogeneous tumor entity. We aimed at ascertaining additional prognostic factors that may facilitate patient stratification for surgery. METHODS: A retrospective review of 233 consecutive adult patients operated on for newly diagnosed GB at a single tertiary institution over a 5-year period (2006-2011) was conducted. Modern defined outcome associating factors recorded included demographics (preoperative age, gender, signs, symptoms, comorbidity status quantified by the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), functional status computed by the Karnofsky performance scale (KPS)), tumor characteristics (size, location, isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation, and O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation status), and treatment parameters (volumetrically quantified extent of resection and adjuvant therapy). Survival analysis was performed by the Kaplan-Maier method. Influence of variables was evaluated using log-rank test. RESULTS: Median neuroradiographic evidence of tumor progression was 6 months after surgery (range 0-72). The median overall survival was 9.5 months (range 0-72). Age > 65 years, KPS ≤ 70, and CCI > 3 were significantly associated with both poor OS (each p < 0.0001) and PFS (p < 0.0001, p < 0.001 and p < 0.002), respectively. Also, patients older than 65 years significantly had a CCI > 3 (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our data evidence that aside established prognostic parameters (age and KPS) for GB patient outcome, the CCI additionally significantly impacts outcome and may be employed for preoperative patient stratification.
Authors: Miriam J Johnson; J Martin Bland; Patricia M Davidson; Phillip J Newton; Stephen G Oxberry; Amy P Abernethy; David C Currow Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2013-07-30 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: G Evren Keles; Edward F Chang; Kathleen R Lamborn; Tarik Tihan; Chih-Ju Chang; Susan M Chang; Mitchel S Berger Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Lola B Chambless; Scott L Parker; Laila Hassam-Malani; Matthew J McGirt; Reid C Thompson Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2011-08-11 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Kaisorn L Chaichana; Khan K Chaichana; Alessandro Olivi; Jon D Weingart; Richard Bennett; Henry Brem; Alfredo Quiñones-Hinojosa Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2010-10-01 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: M J van den Bent; J S Wefel; D Schiff; M J B Taphoorn; K Jaeckle; L Junck; T Armstrong; A Choucair; A D Waldman; T Gorlia; M Chamberlain; B G Baumert; M A Vogelbaum; D R Macdonald; D A Reardon; P Y Wen; S M Chang; A H Jacobs Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2011-04-05 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Paul Kleihues; David N Louis; Bernd W Scheithauer; Lucy B Rorke; Guido Reifenberger; Peter C Burger; Webster K Cavenee Journal: J Neuropathol Exp Neurol Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 3.685
Authors: Mario Balducci; Alba Fiorentino; Pasquale De Bonis; Silvia Chiesa; Stefania Manfrida; Giuseppe Roberto D'Agostino; Giovanna Mantini; Vincenzo Frascino; Gian Carlo Mattiucci; Berardino De Bari; Annunziato Mangiola; Francesco Miccichè; Maria Antonietta Gambacorta; Gabriella Colicchio; Alessio Giuseppe Morganti; Carmelo Anile; Vincenzo Valentini Journal: Med Oncol Date: 2012-06-07 Impact factor: 3.064
Authors: Mark R Gilbert; James J Dignam; Terri S Armstrong; Jeffrey S Wefel; Deborah T Blumenthal; Michael A Vogelbaum; Howard Colman; Arnab Chakravarti; Stephanie Pugh; Minhee Won; Robert Jeraj; Paul D Brown; Kurt A Jaeckle; David Schiff; Volker W Stieber; David G Brachman; Maria Werner-Wasik; Ivo W Tremont-Lukats; Erik P Sulman; Kenneth D Aldape; Walter J Curran; Minesh P Mehta Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-02-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Francesco Bruno; Alessia Pellerino; Edoardo Pronello; Rosa Palmiero; Luca Bertero; Cristina Mantovani; Andrea Bianconi; Antonio Melcarne; Diego Garbossa; Roberta Rudà Journal: Brain Sci Date: 2022-05-11