| Literature DB >> 25576964 |
Géraldine Petit1, Agnieszka Cimochowska2, Carlos Cevallos3, Guy Cheron3, Charles Kornreich2, Catherine Hanak2, Elisa Schroder2, Paul Verbanck2, Salvatore Campanella4.
Abstract
One of the major challenges in alcohol dependence is relapse prevention, as rates of relapse following detoxification are high. Drug-related motivational processes may represent key mechanisms in alcoholic relapse. In the present study, event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded during a visual oddball task administered to 29 controls (11 females) and 39 patients (9 females). Deviant stimuli were related or unrelated to alcohol. For patients, the task was administered following a 3-week detoxification course. Of these, 19 relapsed during the three months follow-up period. The P3, an ERP component associated with activation of arousal systems in the brain and motivational engagement, was examined with the aim to link the fluctuation of its amplitude in response to alcohol versus non-alcohol cues to the observed relapse rate. Results showed that compared to relapsers, abstainers presented with a decreased P3 amplitude for alcohol related compared to non-alcohol related pictures (p=.009). Microstate analysis and sLORETA topography showed that activation for both types of deviant cues in abstainers originated from the inferior and medial temporal gyrus and the uncus, regions implicated in detection of target stimuli in oddball tasks and of biologically relevant stimuli. Through hierarchical regression, it was found that the P3 amplitude difference between alcohol and non-alcohol related cues was the best predictor of relapse vulnerability (p=.013). Therefore, it seems that a devaluation of the motivational significance of stimuli related to alcohol, measurable through electrophysiology, could protect from a relapse within three months following detoxification in alcohol-dependent patients.Entities:
Keywords: Alcohol dependence; Attentional bias; ERPs; P3; Relapse; sLORETA
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25576964 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.12.057
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Behav Brain Res ISSN: 0166-4328 Impact factor: 3.332