Yvonne M Terry-McElrath1, Jamie F Chriqui2, Patrick M O'Malley3, Frank J Chaloupka4, Lloyd D Johnston3. 1. Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Electronic address: yterry@umich.edu. 2. Division of Health Policy and Administration, School of Public Health; Institute for Health Research and Policy. 3. Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 4. Institute for Health Research and Policy; Department of Economics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Beginning in the 2014-2015 school year, all U.S. schools participating in federally reimbursable meal programs are required to implement new nutrition standards for items sold in competitive venues. Multilevel mediation modeling examining direct, mediated, and indirect pathways between policy, availability, and student consumption might provide insight into possible outcomes of implementing aspects of the new standards. PURPOSE: To employ multilevel mediation modeling using state- and school district-level policies mandating school soda bans, school soda availability, and student soda consumption. METHODS: The 2010-2012 Monitoring the Future surveys obtained nationally representative data on high school student soda consumption; school administrators provided school soda availability data. State laws and district policies were compiled and coded. Analyses conducted in 2014 controlled for state-, school-, and student-level characteristics. RESULTS: State-district-school models found that state bans were associated with significantly lower school soda availability (c, p<0.05) but district bans showed no significant associations. No significant direct, mediated, or indirect associations between state policy and student consumption were observed for the overall sample. Among African American high school students, state policy was associated directly with significantly lower school soda availability (a, p<0.01), and-indirectly through lower school availability-with significantly lower soda consumption (a*b, p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These analyses indicate state policy focused on regular soda strongly affected school soda availability, and worked through changes in school availability to decrease soda consumption among African American students, but not the overall population.
BACKGROUND: Beginning in the 2014-2015 school year, all U.S. schools participating in federally reimbursable meal programs are required to implement new nutrition standards for items sold in competitive venues. Multilevel mediation modeling examining direct, mediated, and indirect pathways between policy, availability, and student consumption might provide insight into possible outcomes of implementing aspects of the new standards. PURPOSE: To employ multilevel mediation modeling using state- and school district-level policies mandating school soda bans, school soda availability, and student soda consumption. METHODS: The 2010-2012 Monitoring the Future surveys obtained nationally representative data on high school student soda consumption; school administrators provided school soda availability data. State laws and district policies were compiled and coded. Analyses conducted in 2014 controlled for state-, school-, and student-level characteristics. RESULTS: State-district-school models found that state bans were associated with significantly lower school soda availability (c, p<0.05) but district bans showed no significant associations. No significant direct, mediated, or indirect associations between state policy and student consumption were observed for the overall sample. Among African American high school students, state policy was associated directly with significantly lower school soda availability (a, p<0.01), and-indirectly through lower school availability-with significantly lower soda consumption (a*b, p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These analyses indicate state policy focused on regular soda strongly affected school soda availability, and worked through changes in school availability to decrease soda consumption among African American students, but not the overall population.
Authors: Daniel R Taber; June Stevens; Kelly R Evenson; Dianne S Ward; Charles Poole; Matthew L Maciejewski; David M Murray; Ross C Brownson Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2011-07-21 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Danice K Eaton; Laura Kann; Steve Kinchen; Shari Shanklin; Katherine H Flint; Joseph Hawkins; William A Harris; Richard Lowry; Tim McManus; David Chyen; Lisa Whittle; Connie Lim; Howell Wechsler Journal: MMWR Surveill Summ Date: 2012-06-08
Authors: Sarah A Sliwa; Gabrielle F Miller; Nancy D Brener; Sohyun Park; Caitlin L Merlo Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2017-01-07 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Holly R Wethington; Ramona K C Finnie; Leigh Ramsey Buchanan; Devon L Okasako-Schmucker; Shawna L Mercer; Caitlin Merlo; Youfa Wang; Charlotte A Pratt; Emmeline Ochiai; Karen Glanz Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2020-07 Impact factor: 6.604
Authors: C Morin; J Gandy; L A Moreno; S A Kavouras; H Martinez; J Salas-Salvadó; I Guelinckx Journal: Eur J Nutr Date: 2018-06-12 Impact factor: 5.614
Authors: Rebecca S Mozaffarian; Steven L Gortmaker; Erica L Kenney; Jill E Carter; M Caitlin Westfall Howe; Jennifer F Reiner; Angie L Cradock Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2016-03-03 Impact factor: 2.830