Literature DB >> 25576468

Outcomes of midurethral sling procedures in women with mixed urinary incontinence.

Jonathan L Gleason1, Alison M Parden, Victoria Jauk, Alicia Ballard, Vivian Sung, Holly E Richter.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective was to compare midurethral sling (MUS) urinary outcomes in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) only versus mixed UI (MUI).
METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of women who underwent primary MUS surgery for SUI. MUI was defined as at least "moderately" bothersome urgency and stress incontinence on the Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI-6) subscale of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20). The primary outcome was SUI cure defined by a response of "no," "not at all," or "somewhat" bothersome SUI on both of the two UDI-6 stress subscale items. Symptom impact was assessed using the Urinary Impact Questionnaire (UIQ-7). Multivariable models assessed the effect of MUI on SUI outcomes.
RESULTS: One thousand one hundred and ninety-one primary MUS procedures were reviewed. Seven hundred and fifteen out of 1,191 (60%) questionnaires were returned and 534 out of 715 (75%) had completed baseline and follow-up questionnaires. Mean (± SD) follow-up time was 35 ± 15 months. Women with MUI had a higher (worse) baseline total score on the UDI-6 (p ≤ 0.001). A lower proportion of women with MUI had SUI success compared with the SUI only group (64 vs 84.5%, p <  0.001). On multivariable analyses, women in the MUI group were at an increased risk of SUI failure (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.6, 4.0), but greater improvements in UDI-6 (-31.6 ± 30.6 vs -15.5 ± 25.1), and UIQ-7 scores (-21.7 ± 35.3 vs -15.1 ± 28.2) compared with women with SUI only (all p < 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: Women with MUI are at an increased risk of SUI failure after MUS compared with women with SUI only, but experience greater overall improvement in the impact of urinary symptoms on the quality of life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25576468      PMCID: PMC4409491          DOI: 10.1007/s00192-014-2580-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  22 in total

1.  Mixed incontinence: comparing definitions in non-surgical patients.

Authors:  Linda Brubaker; Emily S Lukacz; Kathryn Burgio; Philippe Zimmern; Peggy Norton; Wendy Leng; Harry Johnson; Stephen Kraus; Anne Stoddard
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.696

2.  Prevalence of urinary urgency symptoms decreases by mid-urethral sling procedures for treatment of stress incontinence.

Authors:  Kirsi Palva; Carl Gustaf Nilsson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Two-year incidence, remission, and change patterns of urinary incontinence in noninstitutionalized older adults.

Authors:  A R Herzog; A C Diokno; M B Brown; D P Normolle; B M Brock
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1990-03

4.  Mixed urinary incontinence--time to uncouple urgency from stress?

Authors:  Peter Emanuel Papa Petros
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 5.  Effectiveness of midurethral slings in mixed urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Preeti Jain; Kelly Jirschele; Sylvia M Botros; Pallavi M Latthe
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Global ratings of patient satisfaction and perceptions of improvement with treatment for urinary incontinence: validation of three global patient ratings.

Authors:  Kathryn L Burgio; Patricia S Goode; Holly E Richter; Julie L Locher; David L Roth
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.696

7.  Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence.

Authors:  Ilker Yalcin; Richard C Bump
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Risk factors of treatment failure of midurethral sling procedures for women with urinary stress incontinence.

Authors:  Kobi Stav; Peter L Dwyer; Anna Rosamilia; Lore Schierlitz; Yik N Lim; Joseph Lee
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2009-10-24       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Health-related quality of life measures for women with urinary incontinence: the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory. Continence Program in Women (CPW) Research Group.

Authors:  S A Shumaker; J F Wyman; J S Uebersax; D McClish; J A Fantl
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Short forms to assess life quality and symptom distress for urinary incontinence in women: the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory. Continence Program for Women Research Group.

Authors:  J S Uebersax; J F Wyman; S A Shumaker; D K McClish; J A Fantl
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.696

View more
  6 in total

1.  Influence of TVT properties on outcomes of midurethral sling procedures: high-stiffness versus low-stiffness tape.

Authors:  Jens Christian Prien-Larsen; Thomas Prien-Larsen; Lars Cieslak; Ram B Dessau
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  A comprehensive look at risk factors for mid-urethral sling revision surgery.

Authors:  Melissa Keslar; Haroutyoun Margossian; Justin E Katz; Nisha Lakhi
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  Predicting urinary incontinence after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  John E Jelovsek
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.927

4.  Change in urinary storage symptoms following treatment for female stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Priya Padmanabhan; Zachary Panfili; William Parker; Alexander Gomelsky
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Previous obstetrical history does not impact short-term mid-urethral sling outcomes.

Authors:  Ole Aleksander Dyrkorn; Anne Cathrine Staff; Sigurd Kulseng-Hanssen; Rune Svenningsen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  De novo or resolved urgency and urgency urinary incontinence after midurethral sling operations: How can we properly counsel our patients?

Authors:  Jung Hyun Shin; Myung-Soo Choo
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2019-08-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.