Kara N Goldman1, Brooke Hodes-Wertz2, David H McCulloh2, Julie D Flom2, Jamie A Grifo2. 1. New York University Fertility Center, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, New York. Electronic address: kara.goldman@med.nyu.edu. 2. New York University Fertility Center, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, New York.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether an association exists between body mass index (BMI) and embryo ploidy in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) with trophectoderm biopsy and 24-chromosome preimplantation genetic screening (PGS). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: University-based fertility center. PATIENT(S): 279 women aged 20-45 years with documented height and weight from the day of oocyte retrieval who underwent 24-chromosome PGS between 2010 and 2013. INTERVENTION(S): None. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: number and percentage of euploid embryos. RESULT(S): Patients were grouped by World Health Organization (WHO) BMI class: underweight (<18.5, n = 11), normal weight (18.5-24.9, n = 196), overweight (25-29.9, n = 50), and obese (≥30, n = 22). Groups were similar by age (mean ± standard error of the mean: 37.5 ± 1.2 to 39.2 ± 0.9), ovarian reserve, and IVF cycle parameters. There was no difference in the number or percentage of euploid embryos by BMI category (<18.5: 27.6% ± 8.5; 18.5-24.9: 34.5% ± 2.2; 25-29.9: 32.1% ± 4.3; ≥30: 30.9% ± 7.3). Age was inversely related to euploidy, but adjusted multivariate regression models failed to demonstrate a statistically significant relationship between BMI and euploidy in underweight (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.09-2.10), overweight (AOR 0.90; 95% CI, 0.43-2.00), or obese (AOR 0.74; 95% CI, 0.25-2.20) patients compared with the normal-weight reference group. CONCLUSION(S): No statistically significant relationship was identified between BMI and euploidy in an otherwise homogenous cohort of patients undergoing IVF with PGS, suggesting that the negative impact of overweight and obesity on IVF and reproductive outcomes may not be related to aneuploidy.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether an association exists between body mass index (BMI) and embryo ploidy in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) with trophectoderm biopsy and 24-chromosome preimplantation genetic screening (PGS). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: University-based fertility center. PATIENT(S): 279 women aged 20-45 years with documented height and weight from the day of oocyte retrieval who underwent 24-chromosome PGS between 2010 and 2013. INTERVENTION(S): None. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: number and percentage of euploid embryos. RESULT(S): Patients were grouped by World Health Organization (WHO) BMI class: underweight (<18.5, n = 11), normal weight (18.5-24.9, n = 196), overweight (25-29.9, n = 50), and obese (≥30, n = 22). Groups were similar by age (mean ± standard error of the mean: 37.5 ± 1.2 to 39.2 ± 0.9), ovarian reserve, and IVF cycle parameters. There was no difference in the number or percentage of euploid embryos by BMI category (<18.5: 27.6% ± 8.5; 18.5-24.9: 34.5% ± 2.2; 25-29.9: 32.1% ± 4.3; ≥30: 30.9% ± 7.3). Age was inversely related to euploidy, but adjusted multivariate regression models failed to demonstrate a statistically significant relationship between BMI and euploidy in underweight (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.09-2.10), overweight (AOR 0.90; 95% CI, 0.43-2.00), or obese (AOR 0.74; 95% CI, 0.25-2.20) patients compared with the normal-weight reference group. CONCLUSION(S): No statistically significant relationship was identified between BMI and euploidy in an otherwise homogenous cohort of patients undergoing IVF with PGS, suggesting that the negative impact of overweight and obesity on IVF and reproductive outcomes may not be related to aneuploidy.
Authors: Andrea Garolla; Damiano Pizzol; Andrea Roberto Carosso; Andrea Borini; Filippo Maria Ubaldi; Aldo Eugenio Calogero; Alberto Ferlin; Antonio Lanzone; Francesco Tomei; Bruno Engl; Laura Rienzi; Lucia De Santis; Giovanni Coticchio; Lee Smith; Rossella Cannarella; Attilio Anastasi; Massimo Menegazzo; Liborio Stuppia; Christian Corsini; Carlo Foresta Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Date: 2021-01-19 Impact factor: 5.555
Authors: María Del Carmen Nogales; María Cruz; Silvia de Frutos; Eva María Martínez; María Gaytán; Marta Ariza; Fernando Bronet; Juan A Garcia-Velasco Journal: Reprod Biol Endocrinol Date: 2021-12-14 Impact factor: 5.211
Authors: Phillip A Romanski; Pietro Bortoletto; Brady Magaoay; Alice Chung; Zev Rosenwaks; Steven D Spandorfer Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2020-11-16 Impact factor: 3.412