Literature DB >> 25575536

Can the site-frequency spectrum distinguish exponential population growth from multiple-merger coalescents?

Bjarki Eldon1, Matthias Birkner2, Jochen Blath3, Fabian Freund4.   

Abstract

The ability of the site-frequency spectrum (SFS) to reflect the particularities of gene genealogies exhibiting multiple mergers of ancestral lines as opposed to those obtained in the presence of population growth is our focus. An excess of singletons is a well-known characteristic of both population growth and multiple mergers. Other aspects of the SFS, in particular, the weight of the right tail, are, however, affected in specific ways by the two model classes. Using an approximate likelihood method and minimum-distance statistics, our estimates of statistical power indicate that exponential and algebraic growth can indeed be distinguished from multiple-merger coalescents, even for moderate sample sizes, if the number of segregating sites is high enough. A normalized version of the SFS (nSFS) is also used as a summary statistic in an approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) approach. The results give further positive evidence as to the general eligibility of the SFS to distinguish between the different histories.
Copyright © 2015 by the Genetics Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  approximate Bayesian computation; approximate maximum likelihood test; coalescent; multiple mergers; population growth; site-frequency spectrum

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25575536      PMCID: PMC4349076          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.114.173807

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.402


  47 in total

1.  Hitchhiking under positive Darwinian selection.

Authors:  J C Fay; C I Wu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  On a test of Depaulis and Veuille.

Authors:  L Markovtsova; P Marjoram; S Tavare
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination.

Authors:  G A Watterson
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 1.570

Review 4.  Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) in practice.

Authors:  Katalin Csilléry; Michael G B Blum; Oscar E Gaggiotti; Olivier François
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations against population growth, hitchhiking and background selection.

Authors:  Y X Fu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  An ancestral recombination graph for diploid populations with skewed offspring distribution.

Authors:  Matthias Birkner; Jochen Blath; Bjarki Eldon
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Characterization of genetic diversity in the nematode Pristionchus pacificus from population-scale resequencing data.

Authors:  Christian Rödelsperger; Richard A Neher; Andreas M Weller; Gabi Eberhardt; Hanh Witte; Werner E Mayer; Christoph Dieterich; Ralf J Sommer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Statistical properties of segregating sites.

Authors:  Y X Fu
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 1.570

9.  Properties of a neutral allele model with intragenic recombination.

Authors:  R R Hudson
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 1.570

10.  Analysis of DNA sequence variation within marine species using Beta-coalescents.

Authors:  Matthias Steinrücken; Matthias Birkner; Jochen Blath
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 1.570

View more
  16 in total

1.  The Site Frequency Spectrum for General Coalescents.

Authors:  Jeffrey P Spence; John A Kamm; Yun S Song
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Genetic Variability Under the Seedbank Coalescent.

Authors:  Jochen Blath; Adrián González Casanova; Bjarki Eldon; Noemi Kurt; Maite Wilke-Berenguer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  On the importance of skewed offspring distributions and background selection in virus population genetics.

Authors:  K K Irwin; S Laurent; S Matuszewski; S Vuilleumier; L Ormond; H Shim; C Bank; J D Jensen
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Coalescent Processes with Skewed Offspring Distributions and Nonequilibrium Demography.

Authors:  Sebastian Matuszewski; Marcel E Hildebrandt; Guillaume Achaz; Jeffrey D Jensen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  Explosive genetic evidence for explosive human population growth.

Authors:  Feng Gao; Alon Keinan
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 5.578

Review 6.  The population genomics of within-host Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Ana Y Morales-Arce; Susanna J Sabin; Anne C Stone; Jeffrey D Jensen
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  Hybrid-Lambda: simulation of multiple merger and Kingman gene genealogies in species networks and species trees.

Authors:  Sha Zhu; James H Degnan; Sharyn J Goldstien; Bjarki Eldon
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Evaluating the contributions of purifying selection and progeny-skew in dictating within-host Mycobacterium tuberculosis evolution.

Authors:  Ana Y Morales-Arce; Rebecca B Harris; Anne C Stone; Jeffrey D Jensen
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 4.171

9.  Nucleotide variation and balancing selection at the Ckma gene in Atlantic cod: analysis with multiple merger coalescent models.

Authors:  Einar Árnason; Katrín Halldórsdóttir
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Multispecies Outcomes of Sympatric Speciation after Admixture with the Source Population in Two Radiations of Nicaraguan Crater Lake Cichlids.

Authors:  Andreas F Kautt; Gonzalo Machado-Schiaffino; Axel Meyer
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.