Tom C Russ1, Margaret Gatz, Nancy L Pedersen, Jean Hannah, Grant Wyper, G David Batty, Ian J Deary, John M Starr. 1. From the aAlzheimer Scotland Dementia Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; bScottish Dementia Clinical Research Network, NHS Scotland, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; cCentre for Cognitive Ageing & Cognitive Epidemiology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; dDivision of Psychiatry, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; eDepartment of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; fDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; gGreater Glasgow & Clyde Nursing Homes Medical Practice, NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom; hPublic Health and Intelligence, NHS National Services Scotland, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; and iDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, UCL, London, United Kingdom.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to estimate the magnitude of geographical variation in dementia rates and suggest explanations for this variation. Small-area studies are scarce, and none has adequately investigated the relative contribution of genetic and environmental factors to the distribution of dementia. METHODS: We present 2 complementary small-area hierarchical Bayesian disease-mapping studies using the comprehensive Swedish Twin Registry (n = 27,680) and the 1932 Scottish Mental Survey cohort (n = 37,597). The twin study allowed us to examine the effect of unshared environmental factors. The Scottish Mental Survey study allowed us to examine various epochs in the life course-approximately age 11 years and adulthood. RESULTS: We found a 2- to 3-fold geographical variation in dementia odds in Sweden, after twin random effects-likely to capture genetic and shared environmental variance-were removed. In Scotland, we found no variation in dementia odds in childhood but substantial variation, following a broadly similar pattern to Sweden, by adulthood. CONCLUSIONS: There is geographical variation in dementia rates. Most of this variation is likely to result from unshared environmental factors that have their effect in adolescence or later. Further work is required to confirm these findings and identify any potentially modifiable socioenvironmental risk factors for dementia responsible for this geographical variation in risk. However, if these factors do exist and could be optimized in the whole population, our results suggest that dementia rates could be halved.
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to estimate the magnitude of geographical variation in dementia rates and suggest explanations for this variation. Small-area studies are scarce, and none has adequately investigated the relative contribution of genetic and environmental factors to the distribution of dementia. METHODS: We present 2 complementary small-area hierarchical Bayesian disease-mapping studies using the comprehensive Swedish Twin Registry (n = 27,680) and the 1932 Scottish Mental Survey cohort (n = 37,597). The twin study allowed us to examine the effect of unshared environmental factors. The Scottish Mental Survey study allowed us to examine various epochs in the life course-approximately age 11 years and adulthood. RESULTS: We found a 2- to 3-fold geographical variation in dementia odds in Sweden, after twin random effects-likely to capture genetic and shared environmental variance-were removed. In Scotland, we found no variation in dementia odds in childhood but substantial variation, following a broadly similar pattern to Sweden, by adulthood. CONCLUSIONS: There is geographical variation in dementia rates. Most of this variation is likely to result from unshared environmental factors that have their effect in adolescence or later. Further work is required to confirm these findings and identify any potentially modifiable socioenvironmental risk factors for dementia responsible for this geographical variation in risk. However, if these factors do exist and could be optimized in the whole population, our results suggest that dementia rates could be halved.
Authors: M Gatz; N L Pedersen; S Berg; B Johansson; K Johansson; J A Mortimer; S F Posner; M Viitanen; B Winblad; A Ahlbom Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 1997-03 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Margaret Gatz; Laura Fratiglioni; Boo Johansson; Stig Berg; James A Mortimer; Chandra A Reynolds; Amy Fiske; Nancy L Pedersen Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Cynthia Balion; Lauren E Griffith; Lisa Strifler; Matthew Henderson; Christopher Patterson; George Heckman; David J Llewellyn; Parminder Raina Journal: Neurology Date: 2012-09-25 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Margaret Gatz; Chandra A Reynolds; Laura Fratiglioni; Boo Johansson; James A Mortimer; Stig Berg; Amy Fiske; Nancy L Pedersen Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2006-02
Authors: Christopher M Perlman; Jane Law; Hui Luan; Sebastian Rios; Dallas Seitz; Paul Stolee Journal: Can J Psychiatry Date: 2018-02-06 Impact factor: 4.356
Authors: Neda Firouraghi; Behzad Kiani; Hossein Tabatabaei Jafari; Vincent Learnihan; Jose A Salinas-Perez; Ahmad Raeesi; MaryAnne Furst; Luis Salvador-Carulla; Nasser Bagheri Journal: Int J Health Geogr Date: 2022-08-04 Impact factor: 5.310
Authors: Tom C Russ; Jean Hannah; G David Batty; Christopher C Booth; Ian J Deary; John M Starr Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Mariana Oliveira; André Padrão; André Ramalho; Mariana Lobo; Ana Cláudia Teodoro; Hernâni Gonçalves; Alberto Freitas Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-11-13 Impact factor: 3.390