| Literature DB >> 25574218 |
Xiu-Hui Zhan1, Guang-Cai Zha1, Ji-Wei Jiao1, Li-Ye Yang2, Xiao-Fen Zhan2, Jiang-Tao Chen3, Dong-DE Xie3, Urbano Monsuy Eyi4, Rocio Apicante Matesa4, Maximo Miko Ondo Obono4, Carlos Sala Ehapo4, Er-Jia Wei2, Yu-Zhong Zheng1, Hui Yang2, Min Lin5.
Abstract
Apolipoprotein E (APOE) gene polymorphism can affect APOE gene transcription, serum lipid levels and repair of tissue damage, which could place individuals at serious risk of cardiovascular disease or certain infectious diseases. Recently, high-resolution melting (HRM) analysis was reported to be a simple, inexpensive, accurate and sensitive method for the genotyping or/and scanning of rare mutations. For this reason, an HRM analysis was used in the present study for APOE genotyping in the Southern Chinese Han and African Fang populations. A total of 100 healthy Southern Chinese Han and 175 healthy African Fang individuals attended the study. Polymerase chain reaction-DNA sequencing was used as a reference method for the genotyping of these samples. The six APOE genotypes could all be rapidly and efficiently identified by HRM analysis, and 100% concordance was found between the HRM analysis and the reference method. The allele frequencies of APOE in the Southern Chinese Han population were 7.0, 87.5 and 5.5% for ɛ2, ɛ3 and ɛ4, respectively. In the African Fang population, the allele frequencies of APOE were 24.3, 65.7 and 10.0% for ɛ2, ɛ3 and ɛ4, respectively. A statistically significant difference was found between the allele frequencies between the populations (P<0.05). In conclusion, the present study revealed the molecular characterization of APOE gene polymorphism in the Han population from the Chaozhou region of Southern China and the Fang population from Equatorial Guinea. The findings of the study indicated that HRM analysis could be used as an accurate and sensitive method for the rapid screening and identification of APOE genotypes in prospective clinical and population genetic analyses.Entities:
Keywords: African Fang; Chinese Han; apolipoprotein E; genotype; high-resolution melting
Year: 2014 PMID: 25574218 PMCID: PMC4280925 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2014.2097
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Ther Med ISSN: 1792-0981 Impact factor: 2.447
Figure 1Strategy for the identification of apolipoprotein E genotypes in the study. PCR, polymerase chain reaction; HRM, high-resolution melting; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism.
Primers for the HRM assay and polymerase chain reaction-DNA sequencing.
| Name | Primers (5′-3′) | Product (bp) |
|---|---|---|
| HRM-rs429358-F | CGGGCACGGCTGTCCAAG | 91 |
| HRM-rs429358-R | CGCGGTACTGCACCAGGC | |
| HRM-rs7412-F | GCAAGCTGCGTAAGCGGCTCC | 112 |
| HRM-rs7412-R | TCGCGGATGGCGCTGAGG | |
| Sequencing-F | CCTCCCACTGTGCGACACCCTCC | 532 |
| Sequencing-R | GTCCGGCTGCCCATCTCCTCCAT |
HRM, high-resolution melting; F, forward, R, reverse.
Figure 2High-resolution melting analysis results of rs429358 and rs7412. (A and B) Tm calling analysis for the amplicon of (A) rs429358 and (B) rs7412. (C and D) Normalized and shifted melting curves for the amplicon of (C) rs429358 and (D) rs7412. (E and F) Normalized and temperature-shifted difference plot for the amplicon of (E) rs429358 and (F) rs7412.
Figure 3Polymerase chain reaction-DNA sequencing results of rs429358 and rs7412. (A) rs429358 T/C heterozygote; (B) rs7412 T/C heterozygote; (C) rs429358 C/C homozygote; (D) rs7412 T/T homozygote; (E) rs429358 T/T heterozygote (wild-type); (F) rs7412 C/C heterozygote (wild-type).
Frequencies of apolipoprotein E genotypes in the Southern Chinese Han and African Fang populations.
| Genotypes | Southern Chinese Han, n (%) | African Fang, n (%) |
|---|---|---|
| ɛ3/ɛ3 | 78 (78.0) | 75 (42.9) |
| ɛ2/ɛ2 | 2 (2.0) | 1 (0.6) |
| ɛ3/ɛ4 | 10 (10.0) | 56 (32.0) |
| ɛ3/ɛ2 | 9 (9.0) | 24 (13.7) |
| ɛ4/ɛ2 | 1 (1.0) | 9 (5.1) |
| ɛ4/ɛ4 | 0 (0.0) | 10 (5.7) |
| Total | 100 (100) | 175 (100) |
Allele frequencies of the apolipoprotein E gene in various populations.
| Apolipoprotein E allele frequencies | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| First author, year (ref.) | Population | n | ɛ2 (%) | ɛ3 (%) | ɛ4 (%) |
| Present data | Han (Chaozhou, China) | 100 | 7.0 | 87.5 | 5.5 |
| Wang, 2012 ( | Han (Xinjiang, China) | 150 | 8.1 | 77.2 | 14.6 |
| Hu, 2011 ( | Han (Guangxi, China) | 200 | 9.2 | 81.4 | 9.3 |
| Kao, 1995 ( | Han (Taiwan, China) | 564 | 7.6 | 87.5 | 4.9 |
| Wang, 1988 ( | Han (Beijing, China) | 95 | 5.3 | 88.3 | 6.4 |
| Wang, 1988 ( | Han (Hubei, China) | 113 | 9.3 | 83.2 | 7.5 |
| Wang, 1988 ( | Han (Hunan, China) | 102 | 5.3 | 88.4 | 6.3 |
| Wang, 1988 ( | Han (Jiangsu, China) | 168 | 7.1 | 86.3 | 6.6 |
| Mayila, 2005 ( | Uygur (Xinjiang, China) | 163 | 12.0 | 82.1 | 16.7 |
| Hu, 2011 ( | Zhuang (Guangxi, China) | 278 | 15.2 | 79.8 | 4.9 |
| Wang, 2012 ( | Li (Hainan, China) | 50 | 9.0 | 76.0 | 15.0 |
| Present data | African Fang (Equatorial Guinea) | 175 | 24.3 | 65.7 | 10.0 |
| Wozniak, 2003 ( | African (Ghana) | 110 | 14.5 | 61.4 | 24.1 |
| Wozniak, 2003 ( | African (Central African Rep) | 70 | 5.7 | 53.6 | 40.7 |
| Wozniak, 2003 ( | African (1, Nigeria) | 97 | 10.3 | 74.2 | 24.1 |
| Wozniak, 2003 ( | African (2, Nigeria) | 781 | 6.4 | 68.4 | 25.2 |
| Wozniak, 2003 ( | African (Sudan) | 103 | 8.3 | 62.6 | 29.1 |
| Wozniak, 2003 ( | African (Ethiopia) | 164 | 3.0 | 81.1 | 15.8 |
| Wozniak, 2003 ( | African (Morocco) | 100 | 6.5 | 85.0 | 8.5 |
| Wozniak, 2003 ( | African (South Africa) | 247 | 7.7 | 55.3 | 37.0 |