| Literature DB >> 25574202 |
Shi-Kun Yang1, Shao-Bin Duan1, Peng Pan1, Xiang-Qing Xu1, Na Liu1, Jun Xu1.
Abstract
Oxidative stress is an important mechanism of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CIAKI). The optimal strategy to prevent CIAKI remains unclear. The aim of the present study was to assess the effect of pentoxifylline, a nonspecific phosphodiesterase inhibitor, on the prevention of CIAKI. A total of 32 healthy male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into normal dietary group (NN; n=8) and a high cholesterol-supplemented dietary group (HN; 4% cholesterol and 1% cholic acid; n=24). At the end of eight weeks, the rats in the high cholesterol diet group were randomly divided into three subgroups (n=8 in each group). CIAKI was induced in two of the subgroups via intravenous injection of the radiocontrast media iohexol (10 ml/kg). Pentoxifylline (50 mg/kg) was administered to one of the iohexol-treated groups via intraperitoneal injection 12 h prior to and following contrast media (CM) injection. Kidney function parameters and oxidative stress markers were then measured. The renal pathological changes were evaluated using hematoxylin and eosin staining and scored semi-quantitatively. In iohexol-injected rats, serum creatinine (Scr), renal pathological scores, renal malondialdehyde (MDA) content, renal NADPH oxidase activity, fractional excretion of sodium (FENa%) and fractional excretion of potassium (FEK%) were significantly increased (P<0.01). The Scr, histologic scores, renal MDA content, NADPH oxidase activity, FENa% and FEK% in the rats treated with pentoxifylline prior to iohexol were observed to be reduced compared with those in rats treated with iohexol alone (P<0.01). This suggests that pentoxifylline significantly attenuates renal injuries, including tubular necrosis and proteinaceous casts induced by CM. It may be concluded that pentoxifylline protected the renal tissue from the nephrotoxicity induced by low-osmolar CM via an antioxidant effect.Entities:
Keywords: acute kidney injury; low-osmolar contrast media; nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase; oxidative stress; pentoxifylline
Year: 2014 PMID: 25574202 PMCID: PMC4280922 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2014.2132
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Ther Med ISSN: 1792-0981 Impact factor: 2.447
Comparison of biochemical indicators in each group prior to contrast media injection (mean±standard deviation; n=8).
| Group | BW (g) | Scr (μmol/l) | TG (mmol/l) | CHOL (mmol/l) | Ccr (ml/min) | FENa% | FEK% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NN | 321.26±85.27 | 32.13±2.96 | 0.32±0.17 | 1.35±0.18 | 0.41±0.05 | 1.36±0.42 | 71.24±7.08 |
| HN | 334.30±72.67 | 35.50±2.44 | 0.39±0.18 | 2.71±0.14 | 0.39±0.04 | 1.48±0.38 | 75.00±6.63 |
| HL | 317.54±86.80 | 34.61±2.49 | 0.41±0.21 | 2.86±0.22 | 0.38±0.03 | 1.56±0.31 | 74.30±6.96 |
| HLP | 321.68±79.46 | 34.92±2.73 | 0.48±0.20 | 2.62±0.25 | 0.38±0.02 | 1.61±0.47 | 73.84±5.84 |
P<0.05, versus NN group.
NN, normal diet group; HN, high cholesterol diet group; HL, high cholesterol plus low-osmolar contrast media iohexol group; HLP, high cholesterol plus iohexol plus pentoxifylline group; BW, body weight; Scr, serum creatinine; CHOL, cholesterol; Ccr, creatinine clearance rate; FEK%, fractional excretion of potassium; FENa%, fractional excretion of sodium.
Changes in renal function indicators in each group 48 h following contrast media injection (mean±standard deviation; n=8).
| Group | Scr (μmol/l) | Ccr (ml/min/100 g) | FENa% | FEK% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NN | 32.95±2.14 | 0.42±0.04 | 1.28±0.25 | 70.61±5.09 |
| HN | 35.62±1.81 | 0.40±0.03 | 1.55±0.41 | 75.29±4.13 |
| HL | 46.69±2.91 | 0.29±0.02 | 3.95±0.15 | 98.25±4.08 |
| HLP | 36.16±2.06 | 0.39±0.03 | 1.78±0.16 | 77.12±5.97 |
P<0.01, versus the HN group;
P<0.01, versus the HL group.
NN, normal diet group; HN, high cholesterol diet group; HL, high cholesterol plus low-osmolar contrast media iohexol group; HLP, high cholesterol plus iohexol plus pentoxifylline group; Scr, serum creatinine; Ccr, creatinine clearance rate; FEK%, fractional excretion of potassium; FENa%, fractional excretion of sodium.
Comparison of renal oxidative stress parameters following contrast media injection (mean±standard deviation; n=8).
| Group | MDA (nmmol/mg protein) | SOD (U/mg protein) | NADPH oxidase (U/mg protein) |
|---|---|---|---|
| NN | 3.43±0.47 | 413.03±23.28 | 14.95±5.12 |
| HN | 4.21±0.75 | 394.67±43.62 | 21.26±8.26 |
| HL | 8.46±0.92 | 317.01±47.36 | 82.42±31.18 |
| HLP | 5.27±0.48 | 422.32±41.50 | 26.59±7.56 |
P<0.01, versus the NN group;
P<0.01, versus the HN group;
P<0.01, versus the HL group.
NN, normal diet group; HN, high cholesterol diet group; HL, high cholesterol plus low-osmolar contrast media iohexol group; HLP, high cholesterol plus iohexol plus pentoxifylline group; NADPH oxidase, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate-oxidase; MDA, malondialdehyde; SOD, superoxide dismutase.
Figure 1Representative renal histomorphological changes in the (A) NN, normal diet group, (B) HN, high cholesterol diet group, (C) HL, high cholesterol plus low-osmolar contrast media iohexol group and (D) HLP, high cholesterol plus iohexol plus pentoxifylline group. (C) In iohexol-injected rats, tubular epithelial cell shedding and basement membrane nudity, vacuolar degeneration of tubular epithelial cells, protein cast, tubular dilation, loss of tubular brush border, and necrosis of partial tubular epithelial cells were observed. However, in (D) the rats treated with pentoxifylline and iohexol, only renal tubular epithelial cell degeneration was observed. Hematoxylin and eosin staining, original magnification, ×200.
Figure 2Comparison of tubular injury scores in each group following contrast media injection. The scores of tubular injury in iohexol-injected rats were significantly higher compared with those in control animals, while the scores of tubular injury in the rats treated with pentoxifylline and iohexol were significantly lower compared with those in rats treated with iohexol alone. aP<0.01, versus the NN group; bP<0.01, versus the HN group; cP<0.01, versus the HL group. NN, normal diet group; HN, high cholesterol diet group; HL, high cholesterol plus low-osmolar contrast media iohexol group; HLP, high cholesterol plus iohexol plus pentoxifylline group.