Literature DB >> 25573250

Tamarins: Insights into monogamous and non-monogamous single female social and breeding systems.

P A Garber1, L M Porter2, J Spross3, A Di Fiore4.   

Abstract

Tamarins are reported to live in small multimale-multifemale groups characterized by a single breeding female. Here we present information on the composition and genetic relatedness of individuals in 12 wild-trapped groups of Weddell's saddleback tamarins (Saguinus weddelli) from northern Bolivia to determine if groups are best described as nuclear or extended families suggesting social monogamy or whether groups contain several unrelated same sex adults indicative of social polyandry/polygyny. Mean group size was 6.25 including an average of 2.16 adult males (range 1-4) and 2.08 adult females (1-3). No group contained only one adult male and one adult female and 25% of groups contained two parous females. We estimated the genetic relatedness among individuals using 13 polymorphic microsatellite markers. Across the population, mean relatedness was low and not significantly different among adult males versus among adult females, suggesting that both sexes disperse from their natal groups. Adults of both sexes also tended to have close same-sex adult relatives within their groups; relatedness among adult females of the same group averaged 0.31 and among adult males was 0.26. This suggests that tamarins of one or both sexes sometimes delay dispersal and remain as adults in their natal group or that emigration of same-sexed relatives into the same group may be common. Finally, parentage analyses indicated that, whereas the parents of juveniles generally were present in the group, this was not always the case. Based on these data, published reports of the presence of multiple breeding males and occasionally multiple breeding females in the same group, and the fact that less than 10% of groups in the wild contain a single adult male-adult female pair, we argue that social polyandry best characterizes the composition of tamarin groups and that monogamy is not a common mating pattern in Saguinus weddelli or other tamarin species.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  callitrichines; cooperative infant caregiving; kinship; polyandry

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25573250     DOI: 10.1002/ajp.22370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Primatol        ISSN: 0275-2565            Impact factor:   2.371


  15 in total

1.  "Monogamy" in Primates: Variability, Trends, and Synthesis: Introduction to special issue on Primate Monogamy.

Authors:  Samuel L Díaz-Muñoz; Karen L Bales
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 2.371

2.  Social monogamy in wild owl monkeys (Aotus azarae) of Argentina: the potential influences of resource distribution and ranging patterns.

Authors:  Eduardo Fernandez-Duque
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 2.371

Review 3.  Social Monogamy in Nonhuman Primates: Phylogeny, Phenotype, and Physiology.

Authors:  Jeffrey A French; Jon Cavanaugh; Aaryn C Mustoe; Sarah B Carp; Stephanie L Womack
Journal:  J Sex Res       Date:  2017-07-13

4.  Hormonal correlates of development and natal dispersal in wild female owl monkeys (Aotus azarae) of Argentina.

Authors:  Margaret Corley; Claudia Valeggia; Eduardo Fernandez-Duque
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.587

Review 5.  Looking for unity in diversity: human cooperative childcare in comparative perspective.

Authors:  Judith M Burkart; Carel van Schaik; Michael Griesser
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  A convergent interaction engine: vocal communication among marmoset monkeys.

Authors:  J M Burkart; J E C Adriaense; R K Brügger; F M Miss; K Wierucka; C P van Schaik
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 6.671

7.  A comparative study of litter size and sex composition in a large dataset of callitrichine monkeys.

Authors:  Dakota E McCoy; Brett M Frye; Jennifer Kotler; Judith M Burkart; Monika Burns; Amanda Embury; Simon Eyre; Peter Galbusera; Jacqui Hooper; Arun Idoe; Agustín López Goya; Jennifer Mickelberg; Marcos Peromingo Quesada; Miranda Stevenson; Sara Sullivan; Mark Warneke; Sheila Wojciechowski; Dominic Wormell; David Haig; Suzette D Tardif
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 2.371

Review 8.  Sex roles and adult sex ratios: insights from mammalian biology and consequences for primate behaviour.

Authors:  Peter M Kappeler
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Fundamental problems with the cooperative breeding hypothesis. A reply to Burkart & van Schaik.

Authors:  A Thornton; K McAuliffe; S R X Dall; E Fernandez-Duque; P A Garber; A J Young
Journal:  J Zool (1987)       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 2.322

Review 10.  Eco-evo-devo of the lemur syndrome: did adaptive behavioral plasticity get canalized in a large primate radiation?

Authors:  Peter M Kappeler; Claudia Fichtel
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 3.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.