Literature DB >> 2557307

194 hepatocellular cancers treated by radiation and chemotherapy combinations: toxicity and response: a Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Study.

G B Stillwagon1, S E Order, C Guse, J L Klein, P K Leichner, S A Leibel, E K Fishman.   

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma is known to have a doubling time of approximately 41 days. This rapid cell division suggested that hyperfractionated radiation and chemotherapy might add an advantage in gaining remission of this malignancy. One hundred and thirty-five patients (70% with metastasis and/or previous treatment) were prospectively treated with single daily fractions to the liver (3.0 Gy external beam radiation, total dose 21.0 Gy), and chemotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. The low dose chemotherapy used in conjunction with the radiation was 2 hr before treatment on days 1, 3, 5, and 7 and consisted of Adriamycin, 15 mg IV and 5-FU, 500 mg IV. These patients were compared to a second group of 59 patients (80% with metastases and/or previous treatment) treated using the same chemotherapy regimen but using hyperfractionated whole liver external beam irradiation (1.2 Gy twice daily, 4 hr between treatments, 5 days per week to 24.0 Gy, 10 MV photons). Response was determined by CT scan tumor volumetric analysis. The response rate for the single daily fraction patient group was 22% and for the new hyperfractionated group, 18% (p = 0.68). Toxicity was evaluated by RTOG criteria. The grade 4 hematologic toxicity noted in the daily fraction patient group was 6%. Among 59 patients treated with the hyperfractionated liver irradiation, 2% experienced grade 4 hematologic toxicity. Esophagitis occurred in 1% of patients in the standard fractionation group and 19% in the hyperfractionated group (p = 0.0001). Grade 1-4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 49% of patients in the conventional group and 68% in the hyperfractionated group (p = 0.03). Normal liver volume changes with treatment were measured with CT scan tumor volumetric analysis. The hyperfractionated group experienced a median of 11 cc increase in liver volume and the conventional group a 46 cc decrease, but the difference was not significant. Hyperfractionated radiation did not demonstrate a significant benefit over standard daily radiation, but acute toxicity appeared to be higher.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2557307     DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(89)90530-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  29 in total

1.  Yttrium-90 radioembolization in the management of liver tumors: expanding the global experience.

Authors:  Ahsun Riaz; Riad Salem
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  [One hundred years of radiotherapy. Historical origins and development of fractionated irradiation in German speaking countries].

Authors:  H Willers; H P Heilmann; H P Beck-Bornholdt
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 3.  Radiation therapy for hepatobiliary malignancies.

Authors:  Jonathan W Lischalk; Michael C Repka; Keith Unger
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-04

4.  Phase I feasibility trial of stereotactic body radiation therapy for primary hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Higinia R Cárdenes; Tracy R Price; Susan M Perkins; Mary Maluccio; P Kwo; T E Breen; Mark A Henderson; Tracey E Schefter; Kathy Tudor; Jill Deluca; Peter A S Johnstone
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.405

5.  Therapeutic effects and prognostic factors in three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  De-Hua Wu; Li Liu; Long-Hua Chen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-08-01       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Whole-liver radiotherapy for end-stage colorectal cancer patients with massive liver metastases and advanced hepatic dysfunction.

Authors:  Seung-Gu Yeo; Dae Yong Kim; Tae Hyun Kim; Sun Young Kim; Yong Sang Hong; Kyung Hae Jung
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  Comparison of coplanar and noncoplanar intensity-modulated radiation therapy and helical tomotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Chen-Hsi Hsieh; Chia-Yuan Liu; Pei-Wei Shueng; Ngot-Swan Chong; Chih-Jen Chen; Ming-Jen Chen; Ching-Chung Lin; Tsang-En Wang; Shee-Chan Lin; Hung-Chi Tai; Hui-Ju Tien; Kuo-Hsin Chen; Li-Ying Wang; Yen-Ping Hsieh; David Y C Huang; Yu-Jen Chen
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-05-23       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 8.  Challenge and hope in radiotherapy of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Jinsil Seong
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 2.759

Review 9.  Role of stereotactic body radiotherapy in the management of primary hepatocellular carcinoma. Rationale, technique and results.

Authors:  H R Cárdenes
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.405

10.  Improved survival for hepatocellular cancer with combination surgery and multimodality treatment.

Authors:  J V Sitzmann; R Abrams
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.