Laparoscopy compared with ultrasonography in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma.

In recent years, various newer imaging procedures have superseded laparoscopy in the detection of many diseases. The role of laparoscopy in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma is still subject to debate. To assess the value of laparoscopy compared with that of ultrasonography, we compared data obtained from a series of 54 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, all of whom had both procedures performed at nearly the same time. In our study, ultrasonography proved superior to laparoscopy in detecting the presence and extent of the hepatocellular carcinoma. Supplemental findings attributable to laparoscopy did not alter management, whereas additional information obtained by ultrasonography often did influence the choice of treatment. We conclude that ultrasonography is the primary diagnostic method of choice in the assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma and that laparoscopy should be reserved for only selected cases.