Literature DB >> 25571792

Has reducing fine particulate matter and ozone caused reduced mortality rates in the United States?

Louis Anthony Tony Cox1, Douglas A Popken2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Between 2000 and 2010, air pollutant levels in counties throughout the United States changed significantly, with fine particulate matter (PM2.5) declining over 30% in some counties and ozone (O3) exhibiting large variations from year to year. This history provides an opportunity to compare county-level changes in average annual ambient pollutant levels to corresponding changes in all-cause (AC) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality rates over the course of a decade. Past studies have demonstrated associations and subsequently either interpreted associations causally or relied on subjective judgments to infer causation. This article applies more quantitative methods to assess causality.
METHODS: This article examines data from these "natural experiments" of changing pollutant levels for 483 counties in the 15 most populated US states using quantitative methods for causal hypothesis testing, such as conditional independence and Granger causality tests. We assessed whether changes in historical pollution levels helped to predict and explain changes in CVD and AC mortality rates.
RESULTS: A causal relation between pollutant concentrations and AC or CVD mortality rates cannot be inferred from these historical data, although a statistical association between them is well supported. There were no significant positive associations between changes in PM2.5 or O3 levels and corresponding changes in disease mortality rates between 2000 and 2010, nor for shorter time intervals of 1 to 3 years.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that predicted substantial human longevity benefits resulting from reducing PM2.5 and O3 may not occur or may be smaller than previously estimated. Our results highlight the potential for heterogeneity in air pollution health effects across regions, and the high potential value of accountability research comparing model-based predictions of health benefits from reducing air pollutants to historical records of what actually occurred.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accountability research; Air pollution; Cardiovascular mortality risks; Causality; Fine particulate matter; Health effects; Ozone; PM10; PM2.5; Respiratory mortality risk

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25571792     DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2014.11.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Epidemiol        ISSN: 1047-2797            Impact factor:   3.797


  6 in total

Review 1.  Accountability studies of air pollution and health effects: lessons learned and recommendations for future natural experiment opportunities.

Authors:  David Q Rich
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 9.621

2.  Causal Modeling in Environmental Health.

Authors:  Marie-Abèle Bind
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 21.981

3.  Best Practices for Gauging Evidence of Causality in Air Pollution Epidemiology.

Authors:  Francesca Dominici; Corwin Zigler
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Interventions to reduce ambient particulate matter air pollution and their effect on health.

Authors:  Jacob Burns; Hanna Boogaard; Stephanie Polus; Lisa M Pfadenhauer; Anke C Rohwer; Annemoon M van Erp; Ruth Turley; Eva Rehfuess
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-05-20

5.  Should air pollution health effects assumptions be tested? Fine particulate matter and COVID-19 mortality as an example.

Authors:  Louis Anthony Cox; Douglas A Popken
Journal:  Glob Epidemiol       Date:  2020-09-02

6.  Health risk assessment of PM2.5 on walking trips.

Authors:  Caihua Zhu; Zekun Fu; Linjian Liu; Xuan Shi; Yan Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.