Literature DB >> 25571595

Distributions in the error space: goal-directed movements described in time and state-space representations.

Moria E Fisher, Felix C Huang, Zachary A Wright, James L Patton.   

Abstract

Manipulation of error feedback has been of great interest to recent studies in motor control and rehabilitation. Typically, motor adaptation is shown as a change in performance with a single scalar metric for each trial, yet such an approach might overlook details about how error evolves through the movement. We believe that statistical distributions of movement error through the extent of the trajectory can reveal unique patterns of adaption and possibly reveal clues to how the motor system processes information about error. This paper describes different possible ordinate domains, focusing on representations in time and state-space, used to quantify reaching errors. We hypothesized that the domain with the lowest amount of variability would lead to a predictive model of reaching error with the highest accuracy. Here we showed that errors represented in a time domain demonstrate the least variance and allow for the highest predictive model of reaching errors. These predictive models will give rise to more specialized methods of robotic feedback and improve previous techniques of error augmentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25571595      PMCID: PMC4914039          DOI: 10.1109/EMBC.2014.6945227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc        ISSN: 1557-170X


  12 in total

1.  Composition and decomposition of internal models in motor learning under altered kinematic and dynamic environments.

Authors:  J R Flanagan; E Nakano; H Imamizu; R Osu; T Yoshioka; M Kawato
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Error correction, sensory prediction, and adaptation in motor control.

Authors:  Reza Shadmehr; Maurice A Smith; John W Krakauer
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 12.449

3.  Temporal and amplitude generalization in motor learning.

Authors:  S J Goodbody; D M Wolpert
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The motor system does not learn the dynamics of the arm by rote memorization of past experience.

Authors:  M A Conditt; F Gandolfo; F A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Motor learning reveals the existence of multiple codes for movement planning.

Authors:  Todd E Hudson; Michael S Landy
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Neurocognitive mechanisms of error-based motor learning.

Authors:  Rachael D Seidler; Youngbin Kwak; Brett W Fling; Jessica A Bernard
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.622

7.  Visual contribution to rapid motor responses during postural control.

Authors:  L Nashner; A Berthoz
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1978-07-14       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Real-time error detection but not error correction drives automatic visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Mark R Hinder; Stephan Riek; James R Tresilian; Aymar de Rugy; Richard G Carson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Visuomotor learning enhanced by augmenting instantaneous trajectory error feedback during reaching.

Authors:  James L Patton; Yejun John Wei; Preeti Bajaj; Robert A Scheidt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Both movement-end and task-end are critical for error feedback in visuomotor adaptation: a behavioral experiment.

Authors:  Takumi Ishikawa; Yutaka Sakaguchi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Ergodicity Reveals Assistance and Learning from Physical Human-Robot Interaction.

Authors:  Kathleen Fitzsimons; Ana Maria Acosta; Julius P A Dewald; Todd D Murphey
Journal:  Sci Robot       Date:  2019-04-17
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.