Literature DB >> 25569429

Real enough: using virtual public speaking environments to evoke feelings and behaviors targeted in stuttering assessment and treatment.

Shelley B Brundage, Adrienne B Hancock.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Virtual reality environments (VREs) are computer-generated, 3-dimensional worlds that allow users to experience situations similar to those encountered in the real world. The purpose of this study was to investigate VREs for potential use in assessing and treating persons who stutter (PWS) by determining the extent to which PWS's affective, behavioral, and cognitive measures in a VRE correlate with those same measures in a similar live environment.
METHOD: Ten PWS delivered speeches-first to a live audience and, on another day, to 2 virtual audiences (neutral and challenging audiences). Participants completed standard tests of communication apprehension and confidence prior to each condition, and frequency of stuttering was measured during each speech.
RESULTS: Correlational analyses revealed significant, positive correlations between virtual and live conditions for affective and cognitive measures as well as for frequency of stuttering.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that virtual public speaking environments engender affective, behavioral, and cognitive reactions in PWS that correspond to those experienced in the real world. Therefore, the authentic, safe, and controlled environments provided by VREs may be useful for stuttering assessment and treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25569429     DOI: 10.1044/2014_AJSLP-14-0087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol        ISSN: 1058-0360            Impact factor:   2.408


  2 in total

Review 1.  An overview of the digital solutions for helping people with aphasia through bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Ikram Asghar; Oche A Egaji; Mark Griffiths
Journal:  eNeurologicalSci       Date:  2021-01-05

2.  Evaluating the Benefits of Aphasia Intervention Delivered in Virtual Reality: Results of a Quasi-Randomised Study.

Authors:  Jane Marshall; Tracey Booth; Niamh Devane; Julia Galliers; Helen Greenwood; Katerina Hilari; Richard Talbot; Stephanie Wilson; Celia Woolf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.