Literature DB >> 25569393

Deformational plagiocephaly and craniosynostosis: trends in diagnosis and treatment after the "back to sleep" campaign.

Leslie G Branch1, Kendra Kesty, Elizabeth Krebs, Lindsey Wright, Stephanie Leger, Lisa R David.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 1992, the American Academy of Pediatrics discouraged prone sleeping positions because of its association with sudden infant death syndrome. After this was an increased incidence of deformational plagiocephaly (DP).
METHODS: A retrospective review was completed for patients with DP and craniosynostosis seen by plastic surgeons at a tertiary medical center during a 19-year period. Two groups of patients were evaluated before (1988-1995) and after (1996-2007) implementation of the "Back to Sleep" campaign.
RESULTS: Of the 5169 patients, those with craniosynostosis (n = 279) had a mean age at initial evaluation before and after 1996 of 12.4 versus 5.6 months (P = 0.0008). There was a trend of decreasing age at initial evaluation and first surgery after 1996. For patients with DP (n = 4890), the mean age at initial evaluation before and after 1996 was 11.5 versus 6.0 months (P = 0.10). There was a trend of decreasing age at initial evaluation and DP correction after 1996. The majority of patients had right-sided DP (50.2%), followed by left-sided (24.7%) and bilateral (18.9%). There was no significant difference in DP correction rate (67% versus 87%) or the mean age that DP was corrected (12.8 versus 11.8 mo) before and after 1996. Compared with 1996 to 1999, there was a 214% and 390% increase in DP referrals from 2000 to 2003 and 2004 to 2007. For craniosynostosis, there was a 27% and 129% increase in referrals.
CONCLUSIONS: The increasing incidence of DP since the Back to Sleep campaign is concerning, but a positive outcome is that patients are being referred and treated at a younger age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25569393     DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000001401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  9 in total

Review 1.  Positional Skull Deformities.

Authors:  Christian Linz; Felix Kunz; Hartmut Böhm; Tilmann Schweitzer
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Safety and efficacy of independent allied healthcare professionals in the assessment and management of plagiocephaly patients.

Authors:  Yahya Khormi; Michelle Chiu; Ronette Goodluck Tyndall; Patricia Mortenson; David Smith; Paul Steinbok
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  Three-Dimensional versus Two-Dimensional Evaluations of Cranial Asymmetry in Deformational Plagiocephaly Using a Three-Dimensional Scanner.

Authors:  Risa Kato; Nobuhiko Nagano; Shin Hashimoto; Katsuya Saito; Hiroshi Miyabayashi; Takanori Noto; Ichiro Morioka
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-27

4.  Positioning and baby devices impact infant spinal muscle activity.

Authors:  Safeer F Siddicky; David B Bumpass; Akshay Krishnan; Stewart A Tackett; Richard E McCarthy; Erin M Mannen
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Neurological assessment of Chinese infants with positional plagiocephaly using a Chinese version of the Infant Neurological International Battery (INFANIB).

Authors:  Xue-Qing Zhao; Li-Yan Wang; Cong-Min Zhao; Qing Men; Zhi-Feng Wu; Yu-Ping Zhang
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 6.  Correlative vs. Causative Relationship between Neonatal Cranial Head Shape Anomalies and Early Developmental Delays.

Authors:  Brian T Andrews; Stefani C Fontana
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 7.  Deformational plagiocephaly: The case for an evolutionary mismatch.

Authors:  Herbert Renz-Polster; Freia De Bock
Journal:  Evol Med Public Health       Date:  2018-08-08

8.  Craniofacial Growth and Asymmetry in Newborns: A Longitudinal 3D Assessment.

Authors:  Ai-Lun Lo; Rami R Hallac; Shih-Heng Chen; Kai-Hsiang Hsu; Sheng-Wei Wang; Chih-Hao Chen; Rei-Yin Lien; Lun-Jou Lo; Pang-Yun Chou
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-25       Impact factor: 4.614

9.  The size and shape of the foramen magnum in man.

Authors:  Matthew J Zdilla; Michelle L Russell; Kaitlyn N Bliss; Kelsey R Mangus; Aaron W Koons
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.