Pantothenate kinase (PanK) is a regulatory enzyme that controls coenzyme A (CoA) biosynthesis. The association of PanK with neurodegeneration and diabetes suggests that chemical modifiers of PanK activity may be useful therapeutics. We performed a high throughput screen of >520000 compounds from the St. Jude compound library and identified new potent PanK inhibitors and activators with chemically tractable scaffolds. The HTS identified PanK inhibitors exemplified by the detailed characterization of a tricyclic compound (7) and a preliminary SAR. Biophysical studies reveal that the PanK inhibitor acts by binding to the ATP-enzyme complex.
Pantothenate kinase (PanK) is a regulatory enzyme that controls coenzyme A (CoA) biosynthesis. The association of PanK with neurodegeneration and diabetes suggests that chemical modifiers of PanK activity may be useful therapeutics. We performed a high throughput screen of >520000 compounds from the St. Jude compound library and identified new potent PanK inhibitors and activators with chemically tractable scaffolds. The HTS identified PanK inhibitors exemplified by the detailed characterization of a tricyclic compound (7) and a preliminary SAR. Biophysical studies reveal that the PanK inhibitor acts by binding to the ATP-enzyme complex.
Pantothenate kinases (PanK) catalyze the
rate-limiting step in
the biosynthesis of CoA and regulate the concentration of this essential
cofactor.[1,2] CoA is found in all living organisms, where
it acts as an acyl group carrier in various synthetic and oxidative
metabolic pathways such as the tricarboxylic acid cycle and fatty
acid metabolism. Four closely related isoforms of PanKs have been
identified in mammals: PanK1α, PanK1β, PanK2, and PanK3,
which are encoded by three genes.[3−5] Recently, the scientific
community has shown interest in the PanK2 and PanK1 isoforms because
of their role in PanK-associated neurodegeneration (PKAN) and diabetes,
respectively.PKAN is
a rare and neurological disorder caused by mutations in
the humanPANK2 gene.[3,6,7] PKAN is inherited in an autosomal recessive pattern
and leads to progressive dystonia, dysarthria, parkinsonism, and pigmentary
retinopathy. Classic PKAN develops around age 3, and most patients
are at risk of early death because there are no FDA approved treatments
for the disease. The PanK2 isoform is highly expressed in human neuronal
tissues and the PANK2 mutations are predicted to
result in significantly lower CoA levels, thereby reducing neuronal
metabolism and function in PKANpatients. Pank2 knockout
mice were generated to investigate the complex pathogenesis of PKAN
but unfortunately did not reproduce the human disease.[8,9] The single Pank1 and Pank2 knockout
mice did not show a neurodegenerative phenotype probably due to compensation
by the other PanK enzymes.[9] Double knockout
mice were either embryonic lethal or died in the first few weeks after
birth, making potential treatments difficult to test.[9] Therefore, the lack of tools to investigate the relationship
between CoA levels and neurodegeneration limits our understanding
of the mechanisms by which PANK2 mutations result
in neurodegeneration.Limitation of the CoA supply by genetic
deletion of PanK1 activity
blunts the hepatic CoA increase in response to fasting and leads to
a deficit in fatty acid oxidation and impaired gluconeogenesis.[10] The key role of CoA in metabolic control is
highlighted by the phenotype of the Pank1–/–Lep–/– double knockout
mouse.[11] The abnormally high level of CoA
in the Lep–/– liver is reduced
by the deletion of the Pank1 gene, resulting in normalization
of the hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia characteristic of the Lep–/– mouse. The Pank1–/–Pank2–/– double knockout mice have a severe metabolic phenotype related to
decreased fatty acid and ketone oxidation and do not survive to weaning.[11] Taken together, these data demonstrate the impact
of reduced intracellular CoA on oxidative metabolism and, in particular,
the fuel switching during the transition from the fed to the fasted
state. These data and the fact that a genome-wide study[12] showed an association between PANK1 variants and insulin levels in humans suggest that PanK inhibitors
may be useful therapeutics for type II diabetes.The above background
and our interest in understanding CoA physiologic
functions led us to hypothesize that it is possible to discover compounds
acting as PanK modulators that can be used in animals to regulate
CoA synthesis. One approach to PKAN treatment would be to identify
PanK1 or PanK3 activators that would stimulate CoA synthesis in tissues
lacking PANK2. The PanK inhibitors would serve as
tools to investigate the role of CoA in adult tissues and accelerate
the identification of bypass drugs to treat PKAN disease. Additionally,
PanK inhibitors may have direct therapeutic application for type II
diabetes.Recently, we reported a high throughput screening
(HTS) study of
3200 unique molecules with known biological activity that identified
small molecule inhibitors and activators of PanK.[13] However, the identified compounds could not be used as
ideal probes for studying the role of PanK in a disease due to their
higher affinity toward other proteins. Therefore, we decided to expand
our high throughput screen to the larger, more chemically diverse
compound libraries available at St. Jude Children’s Research
Hospital.
Results and Discussion
We screened a total of 521133
compounds to discover novel small-molecule
modulators of PanK activity using a luciferase-based method we previously
reported.[13] The screened compound library
contained 504956 small molecules and 16177 natural products acquired
from various commercial sources and collaborators or synthesized at
St. Jude. The PanK3 isoform was selected to conduct the HTS because
it has a wide tissue distribution in mammals and can be purified in
large amounts. All PanK isoforms have homologous catalytic domains,
and so we expected that the PanK3 modulators would act against other
PanK isoforms in a similar fashion.All compounds were screened
at 12 μM concentration in the
PanK3 HTS assay, and the data was analyzed in both activator and inhibitor
modes (Figure 1). The assay provided averaged Z′ value of >0.7 for activators and >0.5 for
inhibitors,
demonstrating the robustness and quality of our assay (Figure 1A,D). The discriminatory power of the primary screen
was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis[14] using 448 representative compounds. True positives
were defined as any compound yielding a well-behaved, saturating sigmoidal
curve in the dose–response assay as determined by fit statistics
such as r2 and visual inspection. ROC
analyses indicated excellent discriminatory power (AUC ≥0.9
for both assays) and suggested that a cutoff of ≥40% for activators
and ≥50% for inhibitors would retain ≥80% of true positives
(Figure 1C,F). On the basis of this ROC analysis,
we classified 9687 compounds (2415 activators and 7272 inhibitors)
as “actives” for further analysis. These active compounds
were then subjected to dose response analysis for PanK1β, PanK3,
luciferase interference, and cytotoxicity assays (see Supporting Information). The dose response analysis
showed that the compounds identified as PanK3 modulators similarly
modulated PanK1β activity. This result was consistent with the
high similarity shared by the two proteins.[15]
Figure 1
HTS
of 521133 compounds from the St. Jude compound library against
PanK3 and ROC analysis of actives. (A) Z′
factor in activator mode. (B) Scatter plot of percentage activity
of each well from 1642 384-well plates analyzed in activator mode
[green, the positive control for the activator screen consisted of
a reaction mixture lacking ATP; red, negative control (DMSO vehicle
with complete assay components); blue, compound with activity above
cutoff; black, compounds with activity below cutoff. Note: Y-axis is normalized % activity, not raw count.]. (C) ROC
analysis of activators showing true (y axis) versus
false (x axis) positive rates of percentage compound
activity. Light-gray curves represent bootstrap simulation curves.
(D) Z′ factor in inhibitor mode. (E) Scatter
plot of percentage activity of each well analyzed in inhibitor mode
[green, the positive control for the inhibitor screen contained 60
μM acetyl-CoA; red, negative control (DMSO vehicle with complete
assay components); blue, compound with activity above cutoff; black,
compounds with activity below cutoff. Note: Y-axis
is normalized % activity, not raw count.]. (F) ROC analysis of inhibitors.
HTS
of 521133 compounds from the St. Jude compound library against
PanK3 and ROC analysis of actives. (A) Z′
factor in activator mode. (B) Scatter plot of percentage activity
of each well from 1642 384-well plates analyzed in activator mode
[green, the positive control for the activator screen consisted of
a reaction mixture lacking ATP; red, negative control (DMSO vehicle
with complete assay components); blue, compound with activity above
cutoff; black, compounds with activity below cutoff. Note: Y-axis is normalized % activity, not raw count.]. (C) ROC
analysis of activators showing true (y axis) versus
false (x axis) positive rates of percentage compound
activity. Light-gray curves represent bootstrap simulation curves.
(D) Z′ factor in inhibitor mode. (E) Scatter
plot of percentage activity of each well analyzed in inhibitor mode
[green, the positive control for the inhibitor screen contained 60
μM acetyl-CoA; red, negative control (DMSO vehicle with complete
assay components); blue, compound with activity above cutoff; black,
compounds with activity below cutoff. Note: Y-axis
is normalized % activity, not raw count.]. (F) ROC analysis of inhibitors.The most promising 100 activators
and 100 inhibitors were selected
based on their potency, curve filter, Hill number, absence of cytotoxicity,
and luciferase interference activity. These compounds were then clustered
together based on their structural similarities. To ensure the synthetic
tractability of the compounds, a similarity search on each of the
scaffolds was performed against the initial “actives”
to generate preliminary structure–activity relationships (SAR)
and deprioritize singleton hits. Representative compounds of each
cluster are shown in Figure 2, and the details
of their dose response analysis are provided in Supporting Information, Tables S1 and S2.
Figure 2
Structures of representative
compounds with different chemical
scaffolds characterized as (A) activators (1–4) and (B) inhibitors (5–8) as identified from the HTS. EC50 and IC50 values (μM) represent the activity of the compounds for PanK3
(see Supporting Information, Tables S1 and S2, for detail dose response analysis).
Structures of representative
compounds with different chemical
scaffolds characterized as (A) activators (1–4) and (B) inhibitors (5–8) as identified from the HTS. EC50 and IC50 values (μM) represent the activity of the compounds for PanK3
(see Supporting Information, Tables S1 and S2, for detail dose response analysis).
Synthesis of Tricyclic Compound 7
Reagents and conditions: (a)
EtOH, hydrazine (5 equiv), 30 min, 160 °C, MW, 74%; (b) EtOH,
methyl 4-acetyl-5-oxohexanoate (1.5 equiv), 15 min, 80 °C, MW,
79%; (c) THF, NaOH, 2 h, rt, 99%; (d) DMF, 3-(methylthio)aniline (1.2
equiv), HBTU (1.3 equiv), Et3N (1.5 equiv), 4 h, rt, 41%.Several compounds with a core tricyclic scaffold
(represented by
compound 7) were in the curated actives list of inhibitors.
Thus, we focused our efforts on the synthesis of compounds with the
tricyclic scaffold to characterize an active compound from the HTS
inhibitor list and to generate preliminary structure–activity
relationships (SAR) for development of more advanced lead compounds.The synthesis of tricyclic compounds is depicted in Scheme 1. Our synthetic efforts began with a microwave assisted
reaction between 2-chloronicotinonitrile (9) with hydrazine.[16] The reaction yielded 10, which
was then reacted with methyl 4-acetyl-5-oxohexanoate to obtain tricyclic 12.[17] The hydrolysis of methyl
ester 12 followed by its coupling with 3-(methylthio)aniline
provided the required compound 7.
The activity
of 7 was determined for each of the principle
PanK isoforms using a radiochemical enzyme assay (Figure 3).[13] The IC50 calculated for compound 7 was 25 nM for PanK3, whereas
the IC50s for PanK1β and PanK2 were 70 and 92 nM,
respectively. These results confirmed the dose–response analysis
using the HTS assay showing that compound 7 inhibited
each of the PANK isoforms at about the same level. Although the radiochemical
and HTS PanK assays were robust and reproducible, the HTS assay (Table 1) consistently yielded higher IC50 values
than the radiochemical assay (Figure 3). The
key difference between the two assays was the ATP concentration. The
HTS assay employed 100 μM ATP, whereas the radiochemical assay
used 2.5 mM ATP. Compound 7 appeared more potent in the
radiochemical assay because the PanK was saturated with ATP4, and the inhibitor binds to the ATP–enzyme intermediate (see
below).
Figure 3
Inhibition of three PanK isoforms by compound 7. These
experiments were typical for the IC50 determinations in
this study. Compound 7 was equally effective against
all three PanK isoforms. IC50 (PanK1β = 70 ±
1.1 nM, PanK2 = 92 ± 2.0 nM, and PanK3 = 25 ± 1.8 nM).
Table 1
Side Chain Structure
and Inhibitory
Potencies of Analogues of Tricyclic Compound 7
Ten points dose
response curve in
triplicate (SD are provided in Supporting Information).
Calculated using ChemBioDraw
Ultra.
LipE is calculated
as LipE = pIC50(PanK3) – ClogP.
Inhibition of three PanK isoforms by compound 7. These
experiments were typical for the IC50 determinations in
this study. Compound 7 was equally effective against
all three PanK isoforms. IC50 (PanK1β = 70 ±
1.1 nM, PanK2 = 92 ± 2.0 nM, and PanK3 = 25 ± 1.8 nM).Ten points dose
response curve in
triplicate (SD are provided in Supporting Information).Calculated using ChemBioDraw
Ultra.LipE is calculated
as LipE = pIC50(PanK3) – ClogP.Next, we designed and synthesized
several analogues of 7 to generate structure–activity
relationship (SAR). Using
the same approach as described for the synthesis of 7, compounds 14–33, having diversification
on the right-hand side of the molecule (R1), were synthesized
through intermediate 13. Table 1 illustrates the activity of these compounds against PanK1β
and PanK3. Removal of the substituent on the aromatic ring (compound 15) resulted in decreased activity, indicating its importance.
Interestingly, when we moved the −SMe substituent from meta- to para-position, the activity of
the compound (14) was reduced by 30-fold. Replacing the
aromatic ring with a cyclohexane ring in compound 17 decreased
the activity against PanK1β and abrogated the activity against
PanK3. Insertion of an additional methylene group between the amino
moiety and the phenyl group gives rise to benzylamino derivatives,
which exhibited either a complete or a significant loss of potency
(compare compounds 22 and 25; 27 and 30; 26 and 29). Compound 16, where the amino group of the anilino moiety is methylated,
was completely inactive against PanK1β and PanK3 (compared to 15), demonstrating the necessity of having a hydrogen bond
donor at that position. By comparing the relative activities of compounds 21, 22, and 23; 26, 27, and 28; 7 and 14; and 19 and 20 suggested that the substitution
at the meta-position on the aniline ring was most
important for the activity observed. A small set of synthesized compounds
(34–42) with the modification on
the tricyclic core (R2) did not show any improved activity
(<30% inhibition at 10 μM) (Figure 4). To evaluate the effect of structural modifications on overall
intrinsic potential of the molecule, we used a well-accepted metric:
lipophilic ligand efficiency (LipE), which combines both potency and
lipophilicity.[18−20] Compared to 7, compound 33 exhibited higher LipE without reducing activity significantly.
Figure 4
Modification
on the left side of the molecule (R2, tricyclic
core). All these modifications resulted in inactive compounds (<30%
inhibition at 10 μM).
Modification
on the left side of the molecule (R2, tricyclic
core). All these modifications resulted in inactive compounds (<30%
inhibition at 10 μM).Overall, this SAR analysis shows that the side chain of tricyclic
compound 7 is tolerant to multiple modifications, providing
an ample opportunity to expand the series in search of more potent,
druglike molecules. Additionally, the higher potency of compound 15 and 23 toward PanK1β compared to PanK3
suggested that further medicinal chemistry efforts might ultimately
lead to selective inhibitors of different PanK isoforms.We
next investigated the kinetic mechanism of compound 7 inhibition of PanK3. As shown in Figure 5A, compound 7 lowered both the Vmax and Km for ATP. The pattern
of compound 7 inhibition with respect to pantothenate
was mixed (Figure 5B). One interpretation of
these data is that compound 7 bound to the ATP–enzyme intermediate.
A thermal shift analysis was performed to confirm that compound 7 bound to the ATP–PanK3 complex (Figure 5C). Compound 7 did not stabilize the protein
to thermal denaturation when ATP was absent but increased the protein’s
thermal stability when added in the presence of 2 mM ATP/Mg2+. The apparent binding constant for compound 7 in these
experiments was 0.3 ± 0.08 μM. These results clearly demonstrate
that compound 7 binds to the ATP–PanK3 complex.
Figure 5
Kinetic
mechanism for PanK3 inhibition by 7. (A) Analysis
of ATP kinetics in the presence of 0 (●), 0.038 (■),
and 0.128 (▲) μM of compound 7 showing mixed-type
inhibition with respect to ATP. (B) Analysis of pantothenate kinetics
in the presence of 0 (●), 0.038 (■), and 0.128 (▲)
μM of compound 7 showing mixed inhibition with
respect to pantothenate. (C) Thermal stabilization of PanK3 by compound 7 in the presence of 2 mM ATP/Mg2+.
Kinetic
mechanism for PanK3 inhibition by 7. (A) Analysis
of ATP kinetics in the presence of 0 (●), 0.038 (■),
and 0.128 (▲) μM of compound 7 showing mixed-type
inhibition with respect to ATP. (B) Analysis of pantothenate kinetics
in the presence of 0 (●), 0.038 (■), and 0.128 (▲)
μM of compound 7 showing mixed inhibition with
respect to pantothenate. (C) Thermal stabilization of PanK3 by compound 7 in the presence of 2 mM ATP/Mg2+.The ability of compound 7 to inhibit
CoA biosynthesis
in cultured C3A cells was evaluated in a metabolic labeling experiment.
Compound 7 caused a dose-dependent decrease in [3H]pantothenate incorporation into CoA (Figure 6). There was no effect on cell viability at the concentrations
of compound 7 used in this experiment. These data confirm
that compound 7 acts as a PanK inhibitor in cultured
cells by blocking de novo CoA biosynthesis.
Figure 6
Inhibition of CoA biosynthesis
in C3A cells. C3A cells were labeled
with [3H]pantothenate for 24 h in the absence or presence
of the indicated concentrations of compound 7. The cells
were extracted, and the amount of radioactive CoA was determined by
binding the extract to DE-81 filters as described under methods. The
apparent IC50 calculated from this data was 0.9 ±
0.11 μM.
Inhibition of CoA biosynthesis
in C3A cells. C3A cells were labeled
with [3H]pantothenate for 24 h in the absence or presence
of the indicated concentrations of compound 7. The cells
were extracted, and the amount of radioactive CoA was determined by
binding the extract to DE-81 filters as described under methods. The
apparent IC50 calculated from this data was 0.9 ±
0.11 μM.
Conclusion
In
summary, we conducted a HTS of 521133 compounds and identified
novel PanK activators and inhibitors capable of modulating PanK activities
and cellular CoA levels. The HTS correctly identifies inhibitors based
on a preliminary SAR of tricyclic compound 7, and the
kinetic experiments show that the inhibitor acts by binding to the
ATP–enzyme complex. Improvement of the selectivity, efficacy,
and other druglike properties of these PanK modulators will require
extensive medicinal chemistry efforts which are beyond the scope of
this work. Our future endeavors will include the further optimization
of identified scaffolds which may lead to a druggable agent capable
of selectively modulating PanK activity in vivo. Additional scaffolds
from HTS data will be identified and developed. Indeed, the development
of modulators of PanK activity could represent a promising approach
to the treatment of PKAN and diabetes.
Methods
The methods are reported in the Supporting
Information.
Authors: Monique A Johnson; Yien Ming Kuo; Shawn K Westaway; Susan M Parker; Katherine H L Ching; Jane Gitschier; Susan J Hayflick Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 5.691
Authors: Chitra Subramanian; Mi-Kyung Yun; Jiangwei Yao; Lalit Kumar Sharma; Richard E Lee; Stephen W White; Suzanne Jackowski; Charles O Rock Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2016-08-23 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Yugo Kuriki; Toru Komatsu; Peter D Ycas; Sara K Coulup; Erick J Carlson; William C K Pomerantz Journal: ACS Chem Biol Date: 2017-03-17 Impact factor: 5.100
Authors: Yevgeniya I Shurubor; Marilena D'Aurelio; Joanne Clark-Matott; Elena P Isakova; Yulia I Deryabina; M Flint Beal; Arthur J L Cooper; Boris F Krasnikov Journal: Molecules Date: 2017-08-23 Impact factor: 4.411
Authors: Lalit Kumar Sharma; Mi Kyung Yun; Chitra Subramanian; Rajendra Tangallapally; Suzanne Jackowski; Charles O Rock; Stephen W White; Richard E Lee Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Date: 2021-11-12 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Christian C Dibble; Samuel A Barritt; Grace E Perry; Evan C Lien; Renee C Geck; Sarah E DuBois-Coyne; David Bartee; Thomas T Zengeya; Emily B Cohen; Min Yuan; Benjamin D Hopkins; Jordan L Meier; John G Clohessy; John M Asara; Lewis C Cantley; Alex Toker Journal: Nature Date: 2022-07-27 Impact factor: 69.504
Authors: Raquel M Simão-Gurge; Neha Thakre; Jessica Strickland; Jun Isoe; Lillian R Delacruz; Brandi K Torrevillas; Anna M Rodriguez; Michael A Riehle; Shirley Luckhart Journal: Biomolecules Date: 2021-05-29
Authors: Lalit Kumar Sharma; Chitra Subramanian; Mi-Kyung Yun; Matthew W Frank; Stephen W White; Charles O Rock; Richard E Lee; Suzanne Jackowski Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2018-10-23 Impact factor: 14.919