Neda Razaz1, Amanda Skoll, John Fahey, Victoria M Allen, K S Joseph. 1. Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology and the School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, and the BC Women's Hospital and Health Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, and the Reproductive Care Program of Nova Scotia and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To conduct a population-based study to assess rates of optimal, suboptimal, and questionably appropriate administration of antenatal corticosteroid (betamethasone or dexamethasone) use. METHODS: All live births in Nova Scotia, Canada, from 1988 to 2012 were included in the study. Temporal trends in optimal (proportion of live births at 24-34 weeks of gestation exposed to antenatal corticosteroids between 24 hours and 7 days before delivery), suboptimal (proportion of live births at 24-34 weeks of gestation exposed to antenatal corticosteroids less than 24 hours or more than 7 days before delivery), and questionably appropriate exposure to antenatal corticosteroids (proportion of live births 35 weeks of gestation or greater exposed to antenatal corticosteroids) were quantified using odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Among 246,459 live births between 1988 and 2012, 2.5% received a partial or a full course of antenatal corticosteroids. The rate of antenatal corticosteroid exposure for neonates born between 28 and 32 weeks of gestation increased from 39.5% in 1988-1992 to 79.3% in 2008-2012, whereas exposure for those born at 33-34 weeks of gestation increased from 14.3 to 49.7%. Optimal antenatal corticosteroid receipt increased from 10% in 1988 to 23% in 2012 (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.6-4.5), suboptimal administration increased from 7 to 34% (OR 6.7, 95% CI 3.9-11.6), and questionably appropriate administration increased from 0.2% in 1988 to 1.7% in 2012 (OR 7.5, 95% CI 4.9-11.3). Of the women who received antenatal corticosteroids in 2012, 52% delivered at 35 weeks of gestation or greater. CONCLUSION: Temporal increases in optimal exposure to antenatal corticosteroids have been matched by increases in suboptimal and questionably appropriate receipt of antenatal corticosteroids, highlighting the need for accurate preterm delivery prognostic models.
OBJECTIVE: To conduct a population-based study to assess rates of optimal, suboptimal, and questionably appropriate administration of antenatal corticosteroid (betamethasone or dexamethasone) use. METHODS: All live births in Nova Scotia, Canada, from 1988 to 2012 were included in the study. Temporal trends in optimal (proportion of live births at 24-34 weeks of gestation exposed to antenatal corticosteroids between 24 hours and 7 days before delivery), suboptimal (proportion of live births at 24-34 weeks of gestation exposed to antenatal corticosteroids less than 24 hours or more than 7 days before delivery), and questionably appropriate exposure to antenatal corticosteroids (proportion of live births 35 weeks of gestation or greater exposed to antenatal corticosteroids) were quantified using odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Among 246,459 live births between 1988 and 2012, 2.5% received a partial or a full course of antenatal corticosteroids. The rate of antenatal corticosteroid exposure for neonates born between 28 and 32 weeks of gestation increased from 39.5% in 1988-1992 to 79.3% in 2008-2012, whereas exposure for those born at 33-34 weeks of gestation increased from 14.3 to 49.7%. Optimal antenatal corticosteroid receipt increased from 10% in 1988 to 23% in 2012 (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.6-4.5), suboptimal administration increased from 7 to 34% (OR 6.7, 95% CI 3.9-11.6), and questionably appropriate administration increased from 0.2% in 1988 to 1.7% in 2012 (OR 7.5, 95% CI 4.9-11.3). Of the women who received antenatal corticosteroids in 2012, 52% delivered at 35 weeks of gestation or greater. CONCLUSION: Temporal increases in optimal exposure to antenatal corticosteroids have been matched by increases in suboptimal and questionably appropriate receipt of antenatal corticosteroids, highlighting the need for accurate preterm delivery prognostic models.
Authors: Mikael Norman; Aurelie Piedvache; Klaus Børch; Lene Drasbek Huusom; Anna-Karin Edstedt Bonamy; Elizabeth A Howell; Pierre-Henri Jarreau; Rolf F Maier; Ole Pryds; Liis Toome; Heili Varendi; Tom Weber; Emilija Wilson; Arno Van Heijst; Marina Cuttini; Jan Mazela; Henrique Barros; Patrick Van Reempts; Elizabeth S Draper; Jennifer Zeitlin Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: Montse Palacio; Elisenda Bonet-Carne; Teresa Cobo; Alvaro Perez-Moreno; Joan Sabrià; Jute Richter; Marian Kacerovsky; Bo Jacobsson; Raúl A García-Posada; Fernando Bugatto; Ramon Santisteve; Àngels Vives; Mauro Parra-Cordero; Edgar Hernandez-Andrade; José Luis Bartha; Pilar Carretero-Lucena; Kai Lit Tan; Rogelio Cruz-Martínez; Minke Burke; Suseela Vavilala; Igor Iruretagoyena; Juan Luis Delgado; Mauro Schenone; Josep Vilanova; Francesc Botet; George S H Yeo; Jon Hyett; Jan Deprest; Roberto Romero; Eduard Gratacos Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2017-03-23 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Jessica Smith; Kellie E Murphy; Sarah D McDonald; Elizabeth Asztalos; Amir Aviram; Stefania Ronzoni; Elad Mei-Dan; Arthur Zaltz; Jon Barrett; Nir Melamed Journal: Arch Gynecol Obstet Date: 2022-01-18 Impact factor: 2.493
Authors: Dane A De Silva; Sarka Lisonkova; Peter von Dadelszen; Anne R Synnes; Laura A Magee Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2017-06-29 Impact factor: 3.007