Extensive Central Nervous System Cryptococcal Disease Presenting as Immune Reconstitution Syndrome in a Patient with Advanced HIV: Report of a Case and Review of Management Dilemmas and Strategies.

One of the complications of the use of antiretroviral therapy (ART), immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS), is particularly problematic in the management of cryptococcal meningitis. We present the case of a 35-year-old male with acquired immune deficiency syndrome diagnosed with extensive central nervous system (CNS) cryptococcal disease, including meningitis and multiple intracranial cysts, diagnosed eight weeks after the initiation of ART. The patient experienced a relapsing and remitting clinical course despite repeated courses of potent antifungal therapy and aggressive management of raised intracranial pressure. This review highlights therapeutic dilemmas and strategies in the management of CNS cryptococcosis complicated with IRIS and highlights gaps in available treatment guidelines.

Introduction

Despite the widespread availability and use of antiretroviral therapy (ART), opportunistic infections continue to cause significant morbidity and mortality among individuals infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).[1-3] One of the adverse consequences of exposure to ART is the development of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) which may manifest as a newly identified opportunistic infection (OI) in previously asymptomatic individuals (unmasking IRIS) or with paradoxical clinical worsening of a known OI (paradoxical IRIS).[4-6] Patients who develop IRIS may experience prolonged or increased rates of hospitalization, disability and increased mortality.[7] IRIS involving OI’s of the central nervous system (CNS) may be particularly life-threatening.[8-10]

Central nervous system cryptococcal disease is a common OI that can present as IRIS. It may mimic disease relapse and, therefore, can be puzzling to providers managing the condition.[11-13] This case-based review will describe a challenging presentation of CNS cryptococcal IRIS disease in a patient with acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) and highlights dilemmas in the management of the disease that are not fully addressed by available treatment guidelines.

Case Report

A 35-year-old male with an 8-year history of AIDS presented with a 3-day history of recurrent frontal headaches, subjective fever and altered mental status. He had a history of non-adherence to medications, but he had resumed antiretroviral drugs for about 10 weeks. Four weeks prior to presentation to our hospital, he had been diagnosed with cryptococcal meningitis (CM) in an outside hospital and had received a 7 day course of intravenous amphotericin B (lipid complex preparation). This was discontinued due to progressive acute kidney injury and he was subsequently placed on high dose (800 mg) oral fluconazole (FLU) daily.

At the antecedent hospital visit, his presenting CD4 count was 16 cells/µL and plasma HIV RNA viral load was 1970 copies/mL, a decrease from a viral load of 50,000 copies/mL at treatment re-initiation 8 weeks previously. His viral load had further declined to less than 20 copies/mL at the time of initial evaluation at our facility 4 weeks later. His nadir CD4 count was 9 cells/µL (Table 1). His antiretroviral drug regimen consisted of darunavir boosted with ritonavir, tenofovir and emtricitabine taken once daily. He reported at least 2 prior episodes of CM with the most recent and preceding episode occurring about 3 years ago. He had not been on antifungal prophylaxis prior to his current illness.

Table 1.

Trend of CD4 count and HIV viral load 8 weeks prior to initial presentation, as well as cerebrospinal fluid parameters and antifungal induction treatment courses of the index patient during the first 5 months of his presentation.

	Week –8	Week 1*	Week 5	Week 12	Week 14	Week 16	Week 20
CSF CRAG	-	1:512	>1:1024	>1:1024	>1:1024	1:512	>1:1024
CSF opening pressure	-	Brisk flow	NR	38	NR	NR	35
CSF WBC (% lymphs)	-	24 (84%)	41 (75%)	12 (64%)	6 (55%)	14 (92%)	23 (56%)
CSF protein	-	702	800	860	650	256	542
CSF glucose	-	6	13	17	24	33	15
CSF fungal stain	-	Negative	1+yeast	Negative	Negative	1+ yeast	Negative
CSF culture	-	C. neoformans	No growth	No growth	No growth	No growth	No growth
HIV VL (copies/mL)	50,000	1740	Not detected	<20
CD4 count (cells/µL)	9 (nadir)	16	16	29
Antifungal induction therapy		AmB (1 week)	LAmB/5-FC (2 weeks)	LAmB/5-FC (8 weeks)

*Week 1 visit was at a separate hospital. CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; CRAG, Cryptococcal antigen; NR, not reported; WBC, white blood cells; VL, viral load; AmB, amphotericin B deoxycholate; LAmB, liposomal amphotericin B; 5-FC, flucytosine. The patient was hospitalized on weeks 1, 5, 12.

On presentation, he was cachectic, but was in no acute distress. Temperature was 36.9°C, heart rate 84 beats/minute, BP 87/65 mmHg, respiratory rate 18 cycles/minute and oxygen saturation of 100% on room air. He was alert and oriented to time, place and person; a mini mental status examination score was 25; he exhibited photophobia but no other meningeal signs. He had bilateral horizontal nystagmus and mild right upper extremity hemiparesis. Cardio-pulmonary exam was unremarkable.

Peripheral white blood cell (WBC) count was 2900 cells/µL with a normal differential. Although no formal measurements were taken, a spinal tap was consistent with elevated opening pressure as there was brisk cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow. CSF analysis showed a WBC count of 41 cells per high power field comprising 75% lymphocytes, protein - 800 mg/dL (<50 mg/dL - normal), and glucose level of 13 mg/dL (40-70 mg/dL - normal). CSF India Ink stain demonstrated yeast but there was no subsequent growth on culture after 4 weeks of incubation. CSF and serum cryptococcal antigen (CRAG) titers were >1:1024 and 1:512 respectively. Blood cultures showed no growth.

A brain magnetic resonance image (MRI) with gadolinium showed clusters of gelatinous cystic lesions along the periventricular white matter structures and within the lateral ventricles, basal ganglia and posterior cranial fossa. There was enlargement of the ventricular system with no evidence of structural obstruction to CSF flow to suggest communicating hydrocephalus. It also showed diffuse leptomeningeal and ependymal enhancement consistent with meningitis and ventriculitis (Figure 1).The patient was started on induction therapy with liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB) 6 mg/kg/d and flucytosine (5FC) 100 mg/kg/d for 2 weeks and subsequently transitioned to 400mg oral FLU with resolution of motor deficits and improved CSF parameters (Table 1). His ART was continued and he was discharged home.

Figure 1.

Brain magnetic resonance image: axial and coronal views showing clusters of cystic structures within the lateral ventricles periventricular white matter area and basal ganglia. There is enlargement of the ventricular system as well. B) shows additional cystic lesions surrounding the fourth ventricle.

He was readmitted to the hospital 5 weeks later with recurrent headaches and fevers. MRI of his brain showed no change. Repeat CSF evaluation showed persistent lymphocytic pleocytosis, hypoglycorrhachia and an elevated opening pressure of 38 cm H2O. There were no cryptococcal organisms noted on fungal stain and culture eventually showed no growth. At this point, it was suspected that his presentation was at least in part due to IRIS. However, because of concern for his persistent cerebral mass lesions, ventriculitis and CSF abnormalities, it was decided to treat him with a prolonged induction course (8 weeks) of LAmB and 5FC followed by FLU consolidation therapy (400 mg daily oral dose). He underwent serial LPs during this course which showed persistently elevated protein, low glucose and high CRAG titers (weeks 12-20 in Table 1).

Four months later, he required placement of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt for persistently elevated CSF pressures. A biopsy of one of his CNS cysts at the time showed an aggregation of organisms morphologically consistent with Cryptococcus species on pathologic examination. No cultures were performed. He was maintained on oral FLU 200 mg daily. On outpatient follow up 1 year later, he demonstrated severe cognitive impairment. Our patient was subsequently lost to follow up and 2 years after his initial presentation, he died. Proximate cause of death remains unknown.

Discussion

Cryptococcal meningitis remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality among patients with AIDS. In recent years, the clinical outcomes of AIDS patients with cryptococcal disease has improved due to the increased availability and use of antiretroviral drugs, adoption of more potent formulations and combinations of antifungal agents, and recognition of the importance of aggressive management of raised intracranial pressure.[14,15] Nonetheless, the mortality remains high, ranging from 5.5 to 25%.[16,17] Cryptococcus neoformans exists in nature predominantly as an encapsulated budding yeast and has a worldwide distribution.[18,19] The organism is found in vegetative matter such as tree barks as well as in bird (pigeon) droppings. Human infection is acquired via inhalation of infectious spores resulting initially in pulmonary disease. Hematogenous dissemination is thought to be the principal method of extra-pulmonary organ involvement.[18] The predominant species which cause human disease are Cryptococcus neoformans var neoformans, Cryptococcus neoformans var grubii and Cryptococcus gattii.[20,21] Cryptococcus gattii is an increasingly recognized cause of more severe cryptococcal disease in both immunocompetent and immunodeficient individuals. This species has a predilection for the CNS including formation of cryptococcomas, and demonstrates a poorer response to antifungal therapy.[19,22] In clinical practice, speciation of cultured cryptococcal isolates is not routinely performed and the management of infection by both species is the same.[16]

Cryptococcal disease in HIV-infected individuals most commonly involves the CNS. Occasionally, it may manifest as isolated pulmonary disease, cutaneous lesions or may be disseminated. HIV-infected individuals are more likely to have CNS disease compared to immunocompetent individuals or those with other acquired immunodeficiency states such as solid organ transplant recipients.[23,24]

Central nervous system disease generally manifests as a meningoencephalitis and/or mass lesions. Four distinct patterns of CNS mass lesions have been described: cryptococcomas, cystic lesions alone, mixed cysts and cryptococcomas, and miliary nodules.[25,26] CNS cryptococcomas are radiologically defined as intra-parenchymal lesions with or without enhancement on computerized tomography (CT) imaging and histologically, they represent a chronic granulomatous reaction to fungal invasion.[26] However, this immune response may be diminished in severely immunosuppressed individuals who are less likely to present with cryptococcomas.

Cryptococcal cysts have been reported in non-HIV and HIV-infected individuals,[27,28] but the actual prevalence is not known. In an autopsy study, gelatinous pseudocysts were noted in 30 out of 45 AIDS patients who died of CNS cryptococcosis.[29] These cystic structures appear to be morphologically unique entities and are distinct from solid cryptococcomas on imaging and by pathologic examination.[30,31] They most likely represent dilated Virchow-Robin (peri-vascular) spaces filled with fungi and sequestered cerebrospinal fluid and the usual sites where these have been identified include the basal ganglia and midbrain.[32] The cysts may be so large to cause pressure-related complications. Large gelatinous pseudocysts causing brain stem compression with seizures in an 11 year old immunocompetent female were described in Indiana.[33] In some instances, the cysts have been reported to persist despite the successful treatment of the underlying disease.[30]

On brain imaging, our patient was found to have cystic lesions in the periventricular white matter, in both lateral ventricles and basal ganglia. These are classic locations for cryptococcal mass lesions which are best detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A single center retrospective review of 29 patients with CNS cryptococcal disease, the majority of whom were HIV positive, evaluated the performance of different modalities of brain imaging: computerized tomography (CT) versus MRI in detection of lesions associated with intracranial cryptococcosis.[32] The study found that MRI was more sensitive than CT scan in detecting abnormalities; notably, half of the patients with abnormal MRI scans had normal CT scans. Three patients who subsequently died were found with cystic lesions in their basal ganglia on autopsy that corresponded with their MRI findings.

Our patient demonstrated clinical signs and symptoms of cryptococcal meningitis at his initial presentation which was 8 weeks after he reinitiated ART. Although he had previously been diagnosed with CM, he had been out of care and presumably asymptomatic for a number of years. The development of recurrent symptoms of CNS cryptococcosis in the setting of an initial low CD4 count with subsequent decline in HIV viral load on antiretroviral therapy is compatible with unmasking IRIS. During his subsequent presentations to care, the absence of growth of cryptococcal organisms in CSF culture also supports IRIS as the etiology of his recurrent symptoms rather than progressive disease. We also believe that the large burden of cryptococcal organisms in the setting of aggregated cysts may have contributed to his clinical relapses as evidenced by his persistent CSF and radiologic abnormalities.

We faced the following dilemmas in the management of our patient.

Management of antiretroviral therapy in central nervous system cryptococcal immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome

The appropriate timing of initiation of ART in HIV infected patients with CM used to be controversial. However, based on 2 recent clinical trials, it is now accepted that early initiation of HAART in antiretroviral treatment naïve patients with CM results in excess mortality that is at least in part due to paradoxical IRIS.[34-36] On the other hand, a meta-analysis of 2 published randomized controlled trials showed no statistically significant difference in mortality between CM patients with early (<4 weeks) versus delayed initiation of ART (>4 weeks).[37] One theoretical advantage to the early use of ART in patients with cryptococcal meningitis is that the associated immune reconstitution should improve clearance of the fungal organisms. However, this has not been observed in clinical practice. A prospective study conducted among ART-naïve patients in Botswana showed no benefit of early initiation of ART (within 7 days) versus delayed therapy (after 28 days) on CSF clearance of cryptococcal organisms despite high rates of IRIS in the early ART group.[38]

There is no data on approaches to the use of ART in patients with unmasking cryptococcal IRIS, such as in our patient. Is there a role for temporary treatment discontinuation? It is certainly plausible that continuation of ART in individuals with CNS cryptococcal IRIS may be similarly associated with increased mortality and morbidity as in individuals who are first initiated on ART early after the event. The alternative, treatment interruption, may have risks including antiretroviral drug resistance as well as AIDS progression and increased mortality.[39-41]

We elected to continue our patient’s ART regimen while aggressively controlling his raised intracranial pressure which is a principal cause of morbidity and mortality in CNS CM with or without IRIS. Finally, to date, studies assessing the impact of the timing of introduction of ART among HIV infected patients with CM have focused primarily on mortality outcomes. However, important morbidity outcomes such as neurocognitive and visual complications have largely been ignored and need to be evaluated in high quality studies.[42]

Distinguishing central nervous system cryptococcal immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome from persistent or progressive disease

Distinguishing between progressive disease and IRIS in patients with CNS cryptococcosis can be challenging but is crucial for determining appropriate management.[43] In the first scenario, the primary focus of management would include a consideration of resumption of and/or prolonged antifungal induction therapy to decrease fungal burden and sterilize infected sites. In the latter case, the goal would be to address inflammatory complications including elevated CSF pressures. Clinically, a worsening of clinical symptoms after an initial improvement, despite potent antifungal therapy and in the setting of ART-associated HIV disease control, favors IRIS.[44] Otherwise, the clinical presentation of IRIS is indistinguishable from progressive cryptococcal disease. Our patient experienced a relapsing and remitting course of disease. Serial lumbar punctures and CSF analysis continued to show significant derangements including elevated opening pressure, elevated protein, hypoglycorrhachia and lymphocytic pleocytosis concerning for persistent cryptococcal disease (Table 1). Cryptococcal antigen titers remained high at 1:512 or greater. Brain imaging showed persistence of his CNS cystic lesions (Figure 1).

The use of laboratory tests to distinguish between cryptococcal IRIS and persistent disease can be challenging. A study by Boulware and colleagues compared CSF parameters at baseline and at the time of development of IRIS in patients with HIV infection and CM. During IRIS compared to baseline, fungal cultures were more likely to be negative (median of 0 versus 13.3 colony forming units/mL on culture, P<0.001) and CSF cryptococcal antigen titers were lower (median of 1:1024 versus 1:32, P<0.001).[45] On the other hand, median CSF protein and leukocytosis were significantly increased in patients with IRIS as were median levels of inflammatory cytokineseotaxin, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), interferon gamma (IFN γ), granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and vascularendothelial growth factor (VEGF). The subgroup of patients in the study with CM relapse had lower levels of TNFα, IFN γ, interleukins (IL) 4,9,12 and 17 compared to those who developed IRIS suggesting a more intense inflammatory response in the latter group. Limiting the utility of these observations is that no cut-off values for the CSF cytokines have been established to distinguish the two clinical entities. In our patient, the CSF India ink and cryptococcal cultures were negative at time of subsequent presentations favoring IRIS but he continued to show elevated CRAG levels, persistent radiologic and CSF abnormalities concerning for persistent disease. Obtaining additional inflammatory markers such as CSF cytokine levels was not feasible.

Duration of antifungal induction therapy in central nervous system cryptococcal disease with mass lesions

The optimal duration of treatment of CNS cryptococcosis in the setting of cryptococcomas or cystic lesions in HIV infected individuals is not well studied. The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines for treatment of cryptococcomas suggests an antifungal induction period of at least 6 weeks; this is based primarily on expert opinion and case reports, as well as observational and retrospective studies mostly in non HIV-infected individuals.[16,46] It is not clear that these recommendations extend to treatment of cryptococcal cysts which are distinct pathologic entities that may have differing responses to antifungal therapy.

Histopathologic examination shows that cryptococcal cysts consist of gelatinous capsular aggregations of fungal organisms which represent protected foci potentially with increased resistance to antifungal therapy due to protective biofilm.[47] These clusters of organisms may remain viable despite long-term antifungal therapy and may be the cause of recrudescence when therapy is discontinued.

The prominent cryptococcal polysaccharide capsule is a well-known means by which the fungus evades immunologic clearance.[48] Immune system evasion is also enhanced by quorum sensing mechanisms when cryptococcal organisms aggregate to form biofilm.[49] A study by Cordoba and colleagues explored the impact of cryptococcal organism capsule size on time-kill curves following exposure to amphotericin B (AmB).[50] Large capsule organisms (10-15 µm) compared to small capsule (2-4 µm) organisms showed more resistance to AmB killing over time. When exposed to 1 microgram/mL concentration of AmB, at 24 hours of incubation, 95% of large capsule isolates survived compared to 15% of small capsule isolates. Furthermore, in vitro studies show that cryptococcal organisms organized in biofilms, compared to planktonic forms, show increased resistance to AmB and complete resistance to azole activity.[51] More studies are needed to explore the optimal management of CNS cryptococcal mass lesions. Our patient continued to have persistent abnormal CSF parameters despite a second course of prolonged antifungal induction therapy perhaps due to his extensive CNS mass lesions. Because cryptococcal cultures yielded no further growth, resistance testing was unable to be performed. However, resistance to AmB and 5FC by wild type cryptococcal isolates is rare.[52]

Role of intrathecal antifungals

The poor CNS penetration of intravenously (IV) administered AmB makes intrathecal administration an attractive option.[53,54] A retrospective review of 2068 CM cases in China, with HIV-infected individuals comprising 2-5% of study subjects, assessed the impact of the addition of intrathecal AmB (iAmB) to each of four treatment groups: systemic AmB, AmB +5FC, AmB + FLU and AmB +5FC + FLU on treatment outcomes.[55] Mortality rate was significantly lower in the iAmB arms compared to the non-iAmB control arm in the first three treatment groups (6% vs 23%, 25% vs 35%, 20% vs 30%, respectively, P<0.05). There were also significant clinical improvement and cure rates in the same groups as well. The addition of iAmB did not impact mortality in the AmB+5FC+FLU arm. However, the use of ventricular drainage (through serial lumbar punctures and ventricular shunts), well known to improve mortality outcomes, were higher overall in patients treated with iAmB across almost all treatment groups (except the AmB + 5FC group) and may have favorably influenced results.

A treatment protocol reported by Yao et al., in a therapeutic trial of iAmB for CM in immunocompetent patients with the objective of improving cure rates, involved the administration of iAmB at a daily dose ranging from 0.1 to 1.0 mg/d dose given twice a week and continued until the CSF cryptococcal cultures were negative. The intrathecal injection consisted of a 1.0 mg/mL concentration of AmB reconstituted with injection water, admixed with 4-5 mL of retrieved CSF and given slowly; coadministered with 1-2 mg of dexamethasone over the treatment period.[56] This was tried in 10 patients who did not have underlying immunodeficiency states; 1 patient developed urinary retention after 25 doses of treatment. All were reported to have been successfully cured with no disease recurrence.

The use of iAmB is not without complications. In a small study describing the successful treatment of cryptococcal meningitis in 14 HIV-negative patients with a unique protocol of 8 weeks of antifungal induction therapy using IV or intrathecal AmB (if intolerant of IV form) and 5FC with lumbar drainage, a 50% complication rate was observed. The predominant adverse effects were lumbosacral nerve irritation and urinary retention. The latter side effect was generally mild and resolved with AmB dose reduction.[57] No infections related to therapeutic lumbar procedures were reported among study participants.

The routine use of intrathecal antifungals is not currently recommended due to insufficient data in HIV-infected individuals, its prohibitive cost and concern for side effects of therapy. Additionally, multiple studies have shown favorable clinical results with conventional IV and oral antifungal therapy. It remains to be seen if certain subgroups of patients would potentially benefit from such aggressive medical therapy.

Role of steroids in severe central nervous system cryptococcosis

While the role of systemic steroids has been better elucidated in certain HIV associated opportunistic infections like tuberculous meningitis, its utility in CNS cryptococcosis is less clear. There are no randomized controlled trials studying the risks and benefits of steroid use in severe CNS cryptococcal disease or IRIS. However, there are multiple case reports of therapeutic success and good neurologic outcomes with the use of adjunctive steroids in HIV and non HIV- infected individuals with severe CNS cryptococcosis,[58-61] but these reports likely reflect reporting bias for positive treatment outcomes.

Improvement in visual outcomes has been reported with adjunctive steroid use.[62,63] However, since steroid use is typically performed in conjunction with other interventions including the control of intracranial pressure and antifungal therapy, it is difficult to assess the independent beneficial role of steroids. Furthermore, not all studies have shown a therapeutic benefit. One retrospective case-control analysis of patients with visual loss and cryptococcal meningitis study who did or did not receive corticosteroids showed no benefit to steroid use for visual outcomes although the sample size was small.[64] Because of the lack of high quality data supportive of the benefits of steroid use, it is not routinely recommended.

End-point of treatment

For CNS cryptococcomas, the IDSA suggests a minimum of a 6 week course of antifungal induction treatment followed by consolidation and maintenance therapy with high dose FLU (400-800 mg oral daily dose) for a period ranging from 6-18 months based on clinical, mycologic and imaging responses.[16] In HIV-infected individuals, the IDSA also recommends discontinuation of maintenance therapy if the CD4 count remains above 100 cells/µL for 3 months and HIV viral load is fully or close to fully suppressed.

Application of these guidelines to a patient such as ours is challenging given that he had a relapsing and remitting clinical course with extensive CNS cerebral cryptococcosis and heavy fungal burden. The use of clinical, mycologic and radiologic responses to guide antifungal treatment discontinuation is not always straightforward. In some cases, clinical resolution may only be temporary and residual neurologic deficits are not uncommon even if immunologic recovery is attained. Clinical disease relapse may occur in the setting of suboptimal therapy, poor medication adherence, as well as confounded by the development of IRIS. Additionally, demonstration of microbiologic clearance of cerebrospinal fluid while a reasonable goal in meningitis, may not be a reliable end-point in patients with solid parenchymal lesions or cysts. Obtaining surgical biopsies to demonstrate sterilization of mass lesions is not practical in most settings. Finally, CNS lesions may persist despite clinical disease eradication,[58] making complete radiologic resolution of disease an unreliable endpoint.

We endorse the IDSA recommendation that a combination of improved clinical symptoms, microbiologic cure and improvement, if not resolution, of imaging findings should guide duration of treatment rather than rigid pre-set courses of therapy especially in complicated CNS disease.

The role for surgery in cryptococcal central nervous system parenchymal disease

In cases where lesions are large with severe neurologic symptoms due to compression of intracranial structures or refractory to medical management, surgical excision may be indicated.[59] Ventricular shunt placement is indicated in some cases for persistently high CSF pressures.

There are rare case reports of successful surgical management of CNS cryptococcomas.[65,66] However, given the typical locations in the CNS and propensity for multiple lesions, complete surgical resection is usually impossible without the risk of serious neurologic damage. Surgery is therefore, unlikely to play a major role in the management of the majority of cases of CNS cryptococcal disease.

Conclusions

Our patient presented with extensive CNS cryptococcal disease following ART exposure and experienced paradoxical clinical relapses predominantly due to IRIS. This is supported by his CD4 recovery in the setting of declining and eventually fully suppressed HIV viral load on ART and the negative CSF cultures when he experienced clinical disease flares. He was treated with prolonged courses of antifungal induction therapy and ART was continued despite the evidence for IRIS as is the current standard of care. His extensive CNS fungal burden in the presence of cryptococcal cysts may have impacted his inability to normalize his CSF profile.

Prompt recognition of the various modes of presentation of opportunistic diseases in patients with HIV-related advanced immunodeficiency syndromes and improved management strategies are important to improved patient outcomes. Furthermore, our case highlights that treatments must be individualized and tailored to address unique individual presentations, particularly when published guidelines fall short. We have also highlighted gaps in current knowledge on the management of CNS cryptococcal disease for which better research-based evidence is needed.