| Literature DB >> 25568688 |
Leila Zarei1, Rajabali Sadrkhanlou1, Rasoul Shahrooz1, Hassan Malekinejad1, Behroz Eilkhanizadeh2, Abbas Ahmadi1.
Abstract
This study was aimed to assess the protective effects of Cornus mas fruit extract (CMFE) and vitamin E (Vit E) on sperm quality parameters in the methotrexate (MTX)-treated mice. Forty-eight young adult male mice (8-12 weeks) were randomly divided into six groups including control and test groups. The control group received normal saline orally , and the test groups were treated MTX (20 mg kg(-1), ip, once weekly), MTX + CMFE (250 mg kg(-1)), MTX + CMFE (500 mg kg(-1)), MTX + CMFE (1000 mg kg(-1)), and MTX + Vit E (100 IU kg(-1), po) for 35 consecutive days. On day 35, after euthanasia the epididymal sperms were isolated. Then the total mean sperm count, sperm viability and motility were determined. The total antioxidant capacity (TAOC) of all experimental groups were also evaluated. The MTX-treated animals showed a significant changes in all parameters of sperm quality assessment compared to the control group. Both Vit E and CMFE were able to protect from MTX-induced effects on sperm maturity and DNA damage. Co-administration of MTX and CMFE and/or Vit E resulted in protection from MTX-reduced TAOC. In conclusion, these data suggested that MTX administration could adversely affect the sperm quality. Moreover, the protective effect of Vit E and CMFE on MTX-induced sperm toxicity was also documented.Entities:
Keywords: Cornus mas; Methotrexate; Mouse; Sperm quality; Vitamin E
Year: 2014 PMID: 25568688 PMCID: PMC4279658
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Res Forum ISSN: 2008-8140 Impact factor: 1.054
Fig. 1The average count of sperms in experimental groups. Asterisk indicates significant difference among the groups (p < 0.05).
The percentage of different parameters of sperm quality (Mean ± SE).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 3.6 ± 4.3 | 38.2 ± 3.7 | 5.2 ± 2.2 | 3.0 ± 8.1 | 5.7 ± 2.8 |
|
| 62.7 ± 5.4 | 59.5 ± 8.9 | 41.0 ± 5.5 | 35.7 ± 6.9 | 16.7 ± 3.6 |
|
| 40.0 ± 7.6 | 38.2 ± 4.1 | 13.2 ± 2.6 | 8.2 ± 1.5 | 7.7 ± 3.5 |
|
| 45.0 ± 7.1 | 42.5 ± 5.0 | 27.2 ± 6.7 | 8.5 ± 4.9 | 7.7 ± 1.7 |
|
| 50.7 ± 3.1 | 51.7 ± 2.6 | 42.0 ± 4.5 | 18.5 ± 3.1 | 15.0 ± 6.3 |
|
| 44.5 ± 2.6 | 52.2 ± 6.1 | 32.7 ± 4.0 | 11.0 ± 0.8 | 7.7 ± 0.9 |
Different letters in each column represent significant differences between groups (p < 0.05).
Fig. 2Evaluation of spermatozoa viability. a) Alive sperms have yellow heads (bright colored); b) Dead sperms have red heads (dark colored), (Eosin-nigrosin, 1000×).
ab Fig. 3Detection of DNA damage in spermatozoa. a) DNA of healthy sperms have green heads; b) DNA of damaged sperms heads are in red color (Acridine orange, 1000×).
b Fig. 4Maturity evaluation of spermatozoa. a) Sperms with mature nucleus show heads in pale blue; b) Immature nucleus sperms represent dark blue heads (Aniline blue, 1000×).
Fig. 5Profiles of total antioxidant capacity among the treatment groups. a,b,c Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).