Literature DB >> 25568390

Does obesity affect outcomes after hip arthroscopy? A cohort analysis.

Asheesh Gupta1, John M Redmond1, Jon E Hammarstedt1, Dror Lindner2, Christine E Stake1, Benjamin G Domb1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Obesity presents a challenging problem in surgical treatment and has led to poorer postoperative outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether hip arthroscopy in the obese patient influences postoperative clinical and patient-reported outcome scores.
METHODS: From February 2008 to February 2012, data were collected prospectively on all patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy. A total of 680 patients were included. All patients were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively with four patient-reported outcome measures. Pain was estimated on the visual analog scale. The patient satisfaction score was measured. Three groups were stratified by body mass index. The non-obese group, those with a body mass index of <30 kg/m(2) (mean, 23.61 kg/m(2)), included 562 patients with a mean age of 34.78 years. The class-I obese group, those with a body mass index of ≥30 to 34.9 kg/m(2) (mean, 33.85 kg/m(2)), included ninety-four patients with a mean age of 44.02 years. The class-II obese group, those with a body mass index of ≥35 to 39.9 kg/m(2) (mean, 39.11 kg/m(2)), included twenty-four patients with a mean age of 39.33 years.
RESULTS: In the non-obese group, the score improvement from the preoperative assessment to the two-year follow-up visit was 63.41 to 83.81 points for the modified Harris hip score, 60.86 to 83.62 points for the Non-Arthritic Hip Score, 66.24 to 86.24 points for the Hip Outcome Score Activities of Daily Living, and 44.01 to 73.26 points for the Hip Outcome Score Sport-Specific Subscale. In the class-I obese group, the score improvement from the preoperative assessment to the two-year follow-up visit was 54.81 to 75.95 points for the modified Harris hip score, 48.98 to 72.51 points for the Non-Arthritic Hip Score, 53.22 to 72.99 points for the Hip Outcome Score Activities of Daily Living, and 30.56 to 60.75 points for the Hip Outcome Score Sport-Specific Subscale. In the class-II obese group, the score improvement from the preoperative assessment to the two-year follow-up visit was 50.81 to 80.01 points for the modified Harris hip score, 42.36 to 72.50 points for the Non-Arthritic Hip Score, 48.11 to 74.73 points for the Hip Outcome Score Activities of Daily Living, and 28.25 to 62.56 points for the Hip Outcome Score Sport-Specific Subscale. Traction time did not vary significantly between groups (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that obese patients started with lower absolute scores preoperatively and ended with lower overall absolute postoperative scores. However, obese patients showed substantial benefit from hip arthroscopy and demonstrated a degree of improvement that was similar to that of the control non-obese group.
Copyright © 2015 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25568390     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00625

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  9 in total

1.  Ability to return to work without restrictions in workers compensation patients undergoing hip arthroscopy.

Authors:  Simon Lee; Gregory L Cvetanovich; Randy Mascarenhas; Thomas H Wuerz; Richard C Mather; Charles A Bush-Joseph; Shane J Nho
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2016-10-27

2.  Results of hip arthroscopy in patients with MRI diagnosis of subchondral cysts-a case series.

Authors:  David E Hartigan; Itay Perets; Leslie C Yuen; Benjamin G Domb
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2017-09-13

3.  Clinical Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopic Surgery in Patients With Femoral Retroversion: A Matched Study to Patients With Normal Femoral Anteversion.

Authors:  David E Hartigan; Itay Perets; John P Walsh; Edwin O Chaharbakhshi; Leslie C Yuen; Benjamin G Domb
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2017-10-27

4.  Effect of Cigarette Smoking on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Hip Arthroscopic Surgery: A Matched-Pair Controlled Study With a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Ajay C Lall; Jon E Hammarstedt; Asheesh G Gupta; Joseph R Laseter; Mitchell R Mohr; Itay Perets; Benjamin G Domb
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-01-29

Review 5.  Evaluation of outcome reporting trends for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome- a systematic review.

Authors:  Ida Lindman; Sarantos Nikou; Axel Öhlin; Eric Hamrin Senorski; Olufemi Ayeni; Jon Karlsson; Mikael Sansone
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2021-04-23

6.  Surgical Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement: Minimum 10-Year Outcome and Risk Factors for Failure.

Authors:  Hamed Vahedi; Steven Yacovelli; Claudio Diaz; Javad Parvizi
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2021-11-11

Review 7.  Hip arthroscopy in obese, a successful combination?

Authors:  N H Bech; I F Kodde; F Dusseldorp; P A M C Druyts; S P L Jansen; D Haverkamp
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2015-11-27

8.  Parameters affecting baseline hip function in patients with cam-derived femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: data analysis from the German Cartilage Registry.

Authors:  Sebastian Serong; Moritz Schutzbach; Stefan Fickert; Philipp Niemeyer; Christian Sobau; Gunther Spahn; Wolfgang Zinser; Stefan Landgraeber
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2021-08-04

9.  Revision Surgery and Progression to Total Hip Arthroplasty After Surgical Correction of Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Filippo Migliorini; Nicola Maffulli; Alice Baroncini; Jörg Eschweiler; Markus Tingart; Marcel Betsch
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 6.202

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.