Tobias F Kröpelin1, Dick de Zeeuw1, Dennis L Andress2, Maarten J Bijlsma3, Frederik Persson4, Hans-Henrik Parving5, Hiddo J Lambers Heerspink6. 1. Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; 2. AbbVie Laboratories, Chicago, Illinois; 3. Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics Unit, Department of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; 4. Steno Diabetes Center, Gentofte, Denmark; 5. Department of Medical Endocrinology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; and Faculty of Health Science, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. 6. Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; h.j.lambers.heerspink@umcg.nl.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Albuminuria change is often used to assess drug efficacy in intervention trials in nephrology. The change is often calculated using a variable number of urine samples collected at baseline and end of treatment. Yet more albuminuria measurements usually occur. Because albuminuria shows a large day-to-day variability, this study assessed to what extent the average and the precision of the antialbuminuric drug effect varies with the number of urine collections at each visit and the number of follow-up visits. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: This study used data from three randomized intervention trials (Aliskiren Combined with Losartan in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy, Selective Vitamin D Receptor Activation for Albuminuria Lowering, and Residual Albuminuria Lowering with Endothelin Antagonist Atrasentan) including patients with type 2 diabetes and macroalbuminuria. Albuminuria-lowering drug effects were estimated from one, two, or three urine collections at consecutive days before each study visit and reported as albuminuria change from baseline to end of treatment or the change over time considering an average of all follow-up albuminuria measurements. RESULTS: Increasing the number of urine collections for an albuminuria measurement at baseline and end of treatment or using all study visits during follow-up did not alter the average drug effect. The precision of the drug effect increased (decreased SEM) when the number of study visits and the number of urine collections per visit were increased. Using all albuminuria measurements at all study visits led to a 4- to 6-fold reduction in sample size to detect a 30% albuminuria-lowering treatment effect with 80% power compared with using baseline and end-of-treatment albuminuria measurements alone. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing the number of urine collections per study visit and the number of visits over time does not change the average drug effect estimate but markedly increases the precision, thereby enhancing statistical power. Thus, clinical trial designs in diabetic nephropathy using albuminuria as an end point can be significantly improved, leading to smaller sample sizes and less complex trials.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:Albuminuria change is often used to assess drug efficacy in intervention trials in nephrology. The change is often calculated using a variable number of urine samples collected at baseline and end of treatment. Yet more albuminuria measurements usually occur. Because albuminuria shows a large day-to-day variability, this study assessed to what extent the average and the precision of the antialbuminuric drug effect varies with the number of urine collections at each visit and the number of follow-up visits. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: This study used data from three randomized intervention trials (Aliskiren Combined with Losartan in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy, Selective Vitamin D Receptor Activation for Albuminuria Lowering, and Residual Albuminuria Lowering with Endothelin Antagonist Atrasentan) including patients with type 2 diabetes and macroalbuminuria. Albuminuria-lowering drug effects were estimated from one, two, or three urine collections at consecutive days before each study visit and reported as albuminuria change from baseline to end of treatment or the change over time considering an average of all follow-up albuminuria measurements. RESULTS: Increasing the number of urine collections for an albuminuria measurement at baseline and end of treatment or using all study visits during follow-up did not alter the average drug effect. The precision of the drug effect increased (decreased SEM) when the number of study visits and the number of urine collections per visit were increased. Using all albuminuria measurements at all study visits led to a 4- to 6-fold reduction in sample size to detect a 30% albuminuria-lowering treatment effect with 80% power compared with using baseline and end-of-treatment albuminuria measurements alone. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing the number of urine collections per study visit and the number of visits over time does not change the average drug effect estimate but markedly increases the precision, thereby enhancing statistical power. Thus, clinical trial designs in diabetic nephropathy using albuminuria as an end point can be significantly improved, leading to smaller sample sizes and less complex trials.
Authors: Dick de Zeeuw; Rajiv Agarwal; Michael Amdahl; Paul Audhya; Daniel Coyne; Tushar Garimella; Hans-Henrik Parving; Yili Pritchett; Giuseppe Remuzzi; Eberhard Ritz; Dennis Andress Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-11-06 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Hiddo J Lambers Heerspink; Ron T Gansevoort; Barry M Brenner; Mark E Cooper; Hans Henrik Parving; Shahnaz Shahinfar; Dick de Zeeuw Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2010-07-15 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Hans-Henrik Parving; Frederik Persson; Julia B Lewis; Edmund J Lewis; Norman K Hollenberg Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-06-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: H J Lambers Heerspink; F L Nauta; C P van der Zee; J W Brinkman; R T Gansevoort; D de Zeeuw; S J L Bakker Journal: Diabet Med Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 4.359
Authors: Dick de Zeeuw; Blai Coll; Dennis Andress; John J Brennan; Hui Tang; Mark Houser; Ricardo Correa-Rotter; Donald Kohan; Hiddo J Lambers Heerspink; Hirofumi Makino; Vlado Perkovic; Yili Pritchett; Giuseppe Remuzzi; Sheldon W Tobe; Robert Toto; Giancarlo Viberti; Hans-Henrik Parving Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2014-04-10 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Hiddo J Lambers Heerspink; Auke H Brantsma; Dick de Zeeuw; Stephan J L Bakker; Paul E de Jong; Ron T Gansevoort Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2008-09-05 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Tobias F Kröpelin; Dick de Zeeuw; Giuseppe Remuzzi; Rudy Bilous; Hans-Henrik Parving; Hiddo J L Heerspink Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2016-04-07 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Sushrut S Waikar; Casey M Rebholz; Zihe Zheng; Shelley Hurwitz; Chi-Yuan Hsu; Harold I Feldman; Dawei Xie; Kathleen D Liu; Theodore E Mifflin; John H Eckfeldt; Paul L Kimmel; Ramachandran S Vasan; Joseph V Bonventre; Lesley A Inker; Josef Coresh Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2018-07-18 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: William Herrington; Nicola Illingworth; Natalie Staplin; Aishwarya Kumar; Ben Storey; Renata Hrusecka; Parminder Judge; Maria Mahmood; Sarah Parish; Martin Landray; Richard Haynes; Colin Baigent; Michael Hill; Sarah Clark Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2016-09-21 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Frederik Persson; Stephen C Bain; Ofri Mosenzon; Hiddo J L Heerspink; Johannes F E Mann; Richard Pratley; Itamar Raz; Thomas Idorn; Søren Rasmussen; Bernt Johan von Scholten; Peter Rossing Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2021-01-27 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Morten Lindhardt; Frederik Persson; Gemma Currie; Claudia Pontillo; Joachim Beige; Christian Delles; Heiko von der Leyen; Harald Mischak; Gerjan Navis; Marina Noutsou; Alberto Ortiz; Piero Luigi Ruggenenti; Ivan Rychlik; Goce Spasovski; Peter Rossing Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2016-03-02 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Jessica M Sontrop; Amit X Garg; Lihua Li; Kerri Gallo; Virginia Schumann; Jennifer Winick-Ng; William F Clark; Matthew A Weir Journal: Can J Kidney Health Dis Date: 2016-02-01
Authors: Simke W Waijer; Di Xie; Silvio E Inzucchi; Bernard Zinman; Audrey Koitka-Weber; Michaela Mattheus; Maximillian von Eynatten; Lesley A Inker; Christoph Wanner; Hiddo J L Heerspink Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2020-09-06 Impact factor: 5.501