| Literature DB >> 25567748 |
Daniela Ernst1, Sinéad M Murphy, Karthik Sathiyanadan, Yu Wei, Alaa Othman, Matilde Laurá, Yo-Tsen Liu, Anke Penno, Julian Blake, Michael Donaghy, Henry Houlden, Mary M Reilly, Thorsten Hornemann.
Abstract
1-Deoxysphingolipids (1-deoxySL) are atypical sphingolipids that are formed by the enzyme serine palmitoyltransferase (SPT) due to a promiscuous use of L-alanine over its canonical substrate L-serine. Several mutations in SPT are associated with the hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathy type I (HSAN1). The current hypothesis is that these mutations induce a permanent shift in the affinity from L-serine toward L-alanine which results in a pathologically increased 1-deoxySL formation in HSAN1 patients. Also, wild-type SPT forms 1-deoxySL under certain conditions, and elevated levels were found in individuals with the metabolic syndrome and diabetes. However, the molecular mechanisms which control the substrate shift of the wild-type enzyme are not understood. Here, we report a novel SPTLC2-S384F variant in two unrelated HSAN1 families. Affected patients showed elevated plasma 1-deoxySL levels and expression of the S384F mutant in HEK293 cells increased 1-deoxySL formation. Previously, S384 has been reported as one of the two (S384 and Y387) putative phosphorylation sites in SPTLC2. The phosphorylation of wild-type SPTLC2 was confirmed by isoelectric focusing. The impact of an S384 phosphorylation on SPT activity was tested by creating mutants mimicking either a constitutively phosphorylated (S384D, S384E) or non-phosphorylated (S384A, Y387F, Y387F+S384A) protein. The S384D but not the S384E variant was associated with increased 1-deoxySL formation. The other mutations had no influence on activity and substrate affinity. In summary, our data show that S384F is a novel mutation in HSAN1 and that the substrate specificity of wild-type SPT might by dynamically regulated by a phosphorylation at this position.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25567748 PMCID: PMC4326654 DOI: 10.1007/s12017-014-8339-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuromolecular Med ISSN: 1535-1084 Impact factor: 3.843
Fig. 1Pedigrees of the SPTLC2–S384F families and electropherogram of affected patients and control (a, b). Square = male; circle = female; diagonal line = deceased; filled symbol = affected; m/+ = heterozygous for mutation; and arrow = proband. c Protein alignment of the SPTLC2 orthologous from human (Homo sapiens), mouse (mus musculus), rat (Rattus norwegicus), cattle (Bos Taurus), zebrafish (Danio rerio), fly (Drosophila melanogaster), baker’s yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), Candida albicans and the two sphingolipid producing bacteria Sphingomonas multivorum and Sphingomonas paucimobilis
Clinical details of SPTLC2–S384F patients
| Family | Age last exam | Sex | AAO | Symptoms at onset | Positive sensory symptoms | Motor UL/LL | Sensory | Ulcers | Amputations | Reflexes | CMTNS2 (CMTES2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Family A | |||||||||||
| III-2 | 54 | M | Mid 30s | Reduced sensation in feet | Shooting pains | N/N | Pin to mid shin | No | No | Preserved | (6/28) |
| III-8 | 65 | F | Early 40s | Numbness in feet | Shooting pains | N/mild distal weakness | Vib to ankle, Pin to wrist and above knee | Yes | BKA, toes | Absent at ankle | 13/36 |
| III-9 | 71 | M | 40s | Numbness in feet | Shooting pains | Mild proximal and severe distal UL and LL weakness | Vib to costal margin, pin to face | Yes | No | Absent in LL | 35/36 |
| Family B | |||||||||||
| II-1 | 47 | M | 30s | Pain in feet | Shooting pains | Mild distal UL weakness/N | Vib to ankles, pin to elbows and above knee | Yes | Toes | Absent at ankles | 19/36 |
| II-2 | 45 | M | 33 | Numb feet | Shooting pains | N/N | Vib to ankles, pin to mid-palm and below knees | Yes | No | Preserved | ND |
AAO age at onset, UL upper limbs, LL lower limbs, CMTNS2 Charcot-Marie-Tooth Neuropathy Score version 220, M male, F female, N normal, Vib vibration, BKA below knee amputation
Neurophysiology of SPTLC2–S384 patients
| Patient | Median | Ulnar | Radial | Common peroneal | Posterior tibial | Superficial peroneal | Sural | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DML (ms) | CV (m/s) | CMAP (mV) | SAP (μV) | DML (ms) | CV (m/s) | CMAP (mV) | SAP (μV) | SAP (μV) | DML (ms) | CV (m/s) | CMAP (mV) | DML (ms) | CV (m/s) | CMAP (mV) | SAP (μV) | SAP (μV) | |
| A II-6 | 5.3 | 42 | 3.6 | NR | 6 | 28 | 0.6 | NR | |||||||||
| A III-2 | |||||||||||||||||
| A III-8 | 3.0 | 58 | 7.0 | NR | 2.9 | 8.7 | NR | 13 | NR | NR | NR | ||||||
| A III-9 | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | |||||||||||
| B II-1 | 3.9 | 49 | 6.1 | NR | 2.5 | 46 | 2.5 | NR | 2 | 3.5 | 42 | 3.3 | |||||
| B II-2 | 3.7 | 50 | 8.6 | 7 | 3.2 | 56 | 9.4 | 2 | 21 | NR | NR | NR | NR | ||||
DML distal motor latency, CV conduction velocity, CMAP compound motor action potential, SAP sensory action potential, ms milliseconds, m/s meters per second, mV millivolts, μV microvolts, NR no response
Fig. 2Total sphingolipids (a) and 1-deoxySL (b) in patients and controls. Total sphingolipids from plasma of two healthy controls, four SPTLC2 S384F and three SPTLC1–C133W patients were extracted and analyzed by LC–MS after acid–base hydrolysis. Data are shown as mean, with error bars representing standard deviations. Total sphingosine (SO) levels were not different between S384F and C133W carriers compared to healthy controls (a), whereas 1-deoxySL (deoxy-SO, deoxy-SA) were significantly elevated in the plasma of patients with the S384F and the C133 W mutations (b). The total 1-deoxySL levels in the plasma of S384F and C133W carriers were comparable (**** p < 0.0001, *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05)
Fig. 3a Changes in the SPTLC2 phosphorylation pattern after phosphatase treatment. Total protein extract of CHO cells were extracted in the presence of phosphatase inhibitors (−P’ase) or alkaline phosphatase (+P’ase). The extract was subjected to isoelectric focusing in the first dimension and separated on a 12 % SDS-PAGE in the second dimension. SPTLC2 was detected with a polyclonal anti-SPTLC2 antibody. Phosphatase treatment resulted a single spot with a uniform isoelectric point (pI). b Extracts from HEK293 cells expressing SPTLC2wt, S384A, S384F or S384D were analyzed by 2D-PAGE. SPTLC2wt and mutants were detected using an anti V5-tag antibody. Isoelectric focusing showed a reduced heterogeneity in the pI for the mutants in comparison with wild type. In vitro SPT activity was analyzed in cell extract of SPTLC2wt, S384F, S384D or S384A expressing HEK293 cells either in the presence of l-serine (c) or l-alanine (d). Cells were grown in the presence of isotope-labeled d3-l-serine (1 mM) and (C13)-labeled l-alanine (5 mM) for 48 h. De novo formed d2-sphinganine (d2-SA) and d2-sphingosine (d2-SO) (e) and de novo formed C13 -deoxy-sphinganine (C13-deoxySA) and C13 -deoxy-sphingosine (C13-deoxySO) (f) (Note during the SPT reaction, one of the deuteriums of the d3-l-serine is replaced by an unlabeled hydrogen which results in the formation of d2 labeled sphinganine). Data are shown as mean with standard deviations (N = 3, ** p < 0.01). g 1-deoxySL formation in response to increasing amounts of l-alanine in the cell medium. SPTLC2wt and S384F, S384D and S384A expressing cells were cultured in the presence of isotope-labeled l-alanine (5–30 mM) for 48 h. The graph shows the total de novo formed 1-deoxySLs as a sum of isotope-labeled deoxy-SA and deoxy-SO
| SPTLC2 exon | Forward primer | Reverse primer | Primer conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CCTACAGAGCCTGCCTTG | CGGTGTGGACTGGCGGAG | 58 touchdown |
| 2 | GGTATAATTCAGCAAATCTC | TTTAACTGCATCTGGAATAG | 60–50 touchdown |
| 3 | TAATGAAATTGCCCTTATAC | AATCATATTGTATCCTCAGC | 60–50 touchdown |
| 4 | ATAGACTTTGTTCTCTCTGC | CTAAATGACATGACAAAGTG | 60–50 touchdown |
| 5 | TCTGAAAAGGACACAACAC | TTTAGCTCACTCTGACTGC | 51.3 |
| 6 | AGCTATTAGTGTTTGTGGC | TCATTTATACTTTCAAGTGC | 60–50 touchdown |
| 7 | TATCTGAGGCATGGTTTC | TAGACTAATGTTCCCTTCAG | 65–55 touchdown |
| 8 | ATAATAATGAAGTGCCAAAC | GTATTATGAGCCTAAACCAG | 60–50 touchdown |
| 9 | TCTAGAACTTAGAAGGAAAGG | TGCCTATTAGTAAACCTGAC | 60–50 touchdown |
| 10 | GATAGAATGGAGATAGAGGAG | TAAGGACAAGACCATTTTC | 60–50 touchdown |
| 11 | TTGAAATCTTTGAGGACAG | GCTCACAAGAACATCAAG | 60–50 touchdown |
| 12 | GCACTAGACATAAGTCCTGC | ACAGAAGTGTGGTTCCTG | 60–50 touchdown |
| S384D_fw: | 5′-TCA CAA AGA GTT TTG GTG CTG ATG GAG GAT ATA TTG GAG GC-3′ |
| S384D_RV: | 5′-GCC TCC AAT ATA TCC TCC ATC AGC ACC AAA ACT CTT TGT GA-3′ |
| S384E_FW: | 5′-TTC ACA AAG AGT TTT GGT GCT GAT GGA GGA TAT ATT GGA GGC AAG-3′ |
| S384E_RV: | 5′-CTT GCC TCC AAT ATA TCC TCC CTC AGC ACC AAA ACT CTT TGT GAA-3′ |
| S384F_FW: | 5′-CAA AGA GTT TTG GTG CTT TCG GAG GAT ATA TTG GAG-3′ |
| S384F_RV: | 5′-GCC TCC AAT ATA TCC TCC GAA AGC ACC AAA ACT CTT-3′ |
| S384A_FW: | 5′-CAC AAA GAG TTT TGG TGC TGC AGG AGG ATA TAT TGG AGG CA-3′ |
| S384A_RV: | 5′-TGC CTC CAA TAT ATC CTC CTG CAG CAC CAA AAC TCT TTG TG-3′ |
| S384AY387F_FW: | 5′-CAA AGA GTT TTG GTG CTG CTG GTG GAT TTA TTG GAG GCA AGA-3′ |
| S384AY387F_RV: | 5′-CCT TCT TGC CTC CAA TAA ATC CAC CAG CAG CAC CAA AAC TCT TTG-3′ |
| Y387F_FW: | 5′-GAG TTT TGG TGC TTC TGG TGG ATT TAT TGG AGG CAA GAA GG-3′ |
| Y387F_RV: | 5′-CCT TCT TGT CTC CAA TAA ATC CAC CAG AAG CAC CAA AAC-3′ |