| Literature DB >> 25567640 |
Véronique Thériault1, Erin S Dunlop2, Ulf Dieckmann3, Louis Bernatchez1, Julian J Dodson1.
Abstract
Although contemporary trends indicative of evolutionary change have been detected in the life-history traits of exploited populations, it is not known to what extent fishing influences the evolution of alternative life-history tactics in migratory species such as salmonids. Here, we build a model to predict the evolution of anadromy and residency in an exploited population of brook charr, Salvelinus fontinalis. Our model allows for both phenotypic plasticity and genetic change in the age and size at migration by including migration reaction norms. Using this model, we predict that fishing of anadromous individuals over the course of 100 years causes evolution in the migration reaction norm, resulting in a decrease in average probabilities of migration with increasing harvest rate. Moreover, we show that differences in natural mortalities in freshwater greatly influence the magnitude and rate of evolutionary change. The fishing-induced changes in migration predicted by our model alter population abundances and reproductive output and should be accounted for in the sustainable management of salmonids.Entities:
Keywords: alternative tactics; eco-genetic model; evolution; fisheries-induced adaptive change; harvest; migration; reaction norm; recreational fishing
Year: 2008 PMID: 25567640 PMCID: PMC3352438 DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2008.00022.x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evol Appl ISSN: 1752-4571 Impact factor: 5.183
Figure 1Schematic overview of the life cycle of brook charr, showing the sequence of events in the eco-genetic model.
Figure 2Empirically derived functions used in the model. (A) Probabilistic migration reaction norms estimated for Morin creek (data from Thériault and Dodson 2003). (B) Probabilistic maturation reaction norms estimated for anadromous individuals (thick lines) and resident individuals (thin lines), in each case showing the 50%, 1%, and 99% probability percentile curves. (C) Relationship between fecundity and body length for anadromous individuals (open circles) and resident individuals (filled circles) (data from Lenormand 2003). (D) Stock-recruitment relationship (based on Elliott 1993). (E) Selectivity curves for different maximal harvest probabilities increasing from 5% to 100% in increments of 10%.
Model parameters and their values.
| Symbol | Description | Equation | Source | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| – | Initial mean body length (mm) | – | 1 | 82.98 |
| – | Initial standard deviation of body length (mm) | – | 1 | 13.68 |
| Mean emergence size (mm) | – | 1 | 31.71 | |
| Standard deviation of emergence size (mm) | – | 1 | 5.52 | |
| Initial heritability of evolving PMigRN traits | – | – | 0.5 | |
| CV | Coefficient of variation for all evolving traits | – | – | 0.08 |
| Evolving PMigRN trait | 1 | −12.36 | ||
| Evolving PMigRN trait (mm−1) | 1 | 0.11 | ||
| Evolving PMigRN trait (year−1) | 1 | 9.69 | ||
| Evolving PMigRN trait (mm−1 year−1) | 1 | −0.08 | ||
| Mean annual growth in saltwater (mm) | 2 | 95.53 | ||
| Mean annual growth in freshwater (mm) | 1 | 35.35 | ||
| GSI | Mean gonado-somatic index | 2 | 0.147 | |
| PMRN slope of resident morph (mm year−1) | 1 | −32.41 | ||
| PMRN intercept of resident morph (mm) | 1 | 259.72 | ||
| PMRN width of resident morph (mm) | 1 | 114.53 | ||
| PMRN slope of anadromous morph (mm year−1) | 2 | −177.58 | ||
| PMRN intercept of anadromous morph (mm) | 2 | 843.38 | ||
| PMRN width of anadromous morph (mm) | 2 | 532.9 | ||
| Constant in fecundity function (mm−1) | 2 | 0.04 | ||
| Constant in fecundity function | 2 | 2.86 | ||
| Constant in stock-recruitment function | 3 | 25.0 | ||
| Constant in stock-recruitment function | 3 | 0.0027 | ||
| Immature natural mortality probability for resident morph under default conditions | – | 2 | 0.60 | |
| Mature natural mortality probability for resident morph under default conditions | – | 2 | 0.88 | |
| Immature natural mortality probability in 1st year for anadromous morph under default conditions | – | 2 | 0.80 | |
| Immature natural mortality probability in 2nd year for anadromous morph under default conditions | – | 2 | 0.60 | |
| Mature natural mortality probability for anadromous morph under default conditions | – | 2 | 0.55 | |
| Immature natural mortality probability for resident morph under poor conditions | – | 2 | 0.80 | |
| Mature natural mortality probability for resident morph under poor conditions | – | 2 | 0.95 | |
| Immature natural mortality probability for resident morph under good conditions | – | 2 | 0.20 | |
| Mature natural mortality probability for resident morph under good conditions | – | 2 | 0.70 |
PMRN, probabilistic maturation reaction norm; PMigRN, probabilistic migration reaction norm.
Data sources: (1) Morin Creek data from Thériault (2001) and Thériault and Dodson (2003), (2) Ste-Marguerite River data for anadromous fish and Morin Creek data for resident fish from Lenormand (2003), (3) based on Elliott (1993).
Figure 3Model results after 100 years of fishing with different maximal harvest probabilities. Panels (A) and (B) show the resultant age-specific migration reaction norms (line thickness increases with increasing maximal harvest probability between 0% and 100% in increments of 10%). Panels (C–H) show how maximal harvest probabilities affect age-specific migration probabilities, age-specific numbers of migrating fish, ages at migration and maturation, individual fecundity, and population abundances. Results are averaged over 30 independent model runs.
Figure 4Model results after 100 years of fishing and different survival conditions in freshwater (poor, normal, or good). The maximum harvest probability was 0.5. Panels (A) and (B) show the resultant age-specific migration reaction norms. Panels (C–F) show how maximal harvest probabilities affect migration probabilities (for ages 1 and 2 combined), numbers of migrating fish (for ages 1 and 2 combined), total population abundances, and cumulative catches. Results are averaged over 30 independent model runs.