Literature DB >> 25567075

Mapping 'consistency' in India's climate change position: Dynamics and dilemmas of science diplomacy.

Himangana Gupta1, Ravinder Kumar Kohli, Amrik Singh Ahluwalia.   

Abstract

India's position on climate change negotiations is likely to have far reaching implications for the success of global climate cooperation. Since the beginning of negotiations, the principle of equity and common but differentiated responsibilities (CBDR) remained the centerpiece of India's stand. The stand started to evolve at the 15th Conference of Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change at Copenhagen in 2009, when India accepted voluntary commitments to reduce emission intensity. Though India still swears by CBDR, status of the principle in the negotiations has become doubtful after the Durban Climate Conference in 2011 committed all parties to take emission targets. This paper traces major transition points in India's negotiating position over the years and provides a descriptive context of its climate-related concerns. It analyzes the interview responses of 15 top scientists, experts, and negotiators to build upon core areas of climate change issues in India, its future role, and position in negotiations. Interviewees, in general, were in favor of protecting the carbon space for the poor who had very low emissions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25567075      PMCID: PMC4552713          DOI: 10.1007/s13280-014-0609-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ambio        ISSN: 0044-7447            Impact factor:   5.129


  3 in total

1.  Climate policy in India: what shapes international, national and state policy?

Authors:  Aaron Atteridge; Manish Kumar Shrivastava; Neha Pahuja; Himani Upadhyay
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 5.129

2.  Copenhagen Accord pledges are paltry.

Authors:  Joeri Rogelj; Julia Nabel; Claudine Chen; William Hare; Kathleen Markmann; Malte Meinshausen; Michiel Schaeffer; Kirsten Macey; Niklas Höhne
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Science and society. Framing Science.

Authors:  Matthew C Nisbet; Chris Mooney
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-04-06       Impact factor: 47.728

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.