Literature DB >> 25566993

The Ras-Membrane Interface: Isoform-specific Differences in The Catalytic Domain.

Jillian A Parker1, Carla Mattos2.   

Abstract

The small GTPase Ras is mutated in about 20% of human cancers, primarily at active site amino acid residues G12, G13, and Q61. Thus, structural biology research has focused on the active site, impairment of GTP hydrolysis by oncogenic mutants, and characterization of protein-protein interactions in the effector lobe half of the protein. The C-terminal hypervariable region has increasingly gained attention due to its importance in H-Ras, N-Ras, and K-Ras differences in membrane association. A high-resolution molecular view of the Ras-membrane interaction involving the allosteric lobe of the catalytic domain has lagged behind, although evidence suggests that it contributes to isoform specificity. The allosteric lobe has recently gained interest for harboring potential sites for more selective targeting of this elusive "undruggable" protein. The present review reveals critical insight that isoform-specific differences appear prominently at these potentially targetable sites and integrates these differences with knowledge of Ras plasma membrane localization, with the intent to better understand the structure-function relationships needed to design isoform-specific Ras inhibitors. ©2015 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25566993     DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-14-0535

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cancer Res        ISSN: 1541-7786            Impact factor:   5.852


  26 in total

Review 1.  Drugging Ras GTPase: a comprehensive mechanistic and signaling structural view.

Authors:  Shaoyong Lu; Hyunbum Jang; Shuo Gu; Jian Zhang; Ruth Nussinov
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 54.564

2.  The small GTPases K-Ras, N-Ras, and H-Ras have distinct biochemical properties determined by allosteric effects.

Authors:  Christian W Johnson; Derion Reid; Jillian A Parker; Shores Salter; Ryan Knihtila; Petr Kuzmic; Carla Mattos
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 3.  Biology, pathology, and therapeutic targeting of RAS.

Authors:  J Matthew Rhett; Imran Khan; John P O'Bryan
Journal:  Adv Cancer Res       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 6.242

4.  Targeting the α4-α5 interface of RAS results in multiple levels of inhibition.

Authors:  Russell Spencer-Smith; Lie Li; Sheela Prasad; Akiko Koide; Shohei Koide; John P O'Bryan
Journal:  Small GTPases       Date:  2017-12-31

Review 5.  Oncogenic Ras Isoforms Signaling Specificity at the Membrane.

Authors:  Ruth Nussinov; Chung-Jung Tsai; Hyunbum Jang
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 6.  PI3K: A Crucial Piece in the RAS Signaling Puzzle.

Authors:  Agata Adelajda Krygowska; Esther Castellano
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 6.915

7.  Distinct Binding Preferences between Ras and Raf Family Members and the Impact on Oncogenic Ras Signaling.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Terrell; David E Durrant; Daniel A Ritt; Nancy E Sealover; Erin Sheffels; Russell Spencer-Smith; Dominic Esposito; Yong Zhou; John F Hancock; Robert L Kortum; Deborah K Morrison
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 8.  RAS isoforms and mutations in cancer at a glance.

Authors:  G Aaron Hobbs; Channing J Der; Kent L Rossman
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 5.285

9.  Oncogenic and RASopathy-associated K-RAS mutations relieve membrane-dependent occlusion of the effector-binding site.

Authors:  Mohammad T Mazhab-Jafari; Christopher B Marshall; Matthew J Smith; Geneviève M C Gasmi-Seabrook; Peter B Stathopulos; Fuyuhiko Inagaki; Lewis E Kay; Benjamin G Neel; Mitsuhiko Ikura
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Oncogenic K-Ras Binds to an Anionic Membrane in Two Distinct Orientations: A Molecular Dynamics Analysis.

Authors:  Priyanka Prakash; Yong Zhou; Hong Liang; John F Hancock; Alemayehu A Gorfe
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.