Lizzy M M Boots1, Claire A G Wolfs1, Frans R J Verhey1, Gertrudis I J M Kempen2, Marjolein E de Vugt1. 1. School for Mental Health and Neuroscience,Alzheimer Center Limburg,Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology,Maastricht University Medical Center,Maastricht,the Netherlands. 2. CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care,Department of Health Services Research,Maastricht University,Maastricht,the Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Early individualized interventions for informal dementia caregivers can prevent overburdening in the later stages. However, the needs of early-stage dementia caregivers (EDC) remain largely unknown. This study aimed to explore the needs and wishes and need for care of EDC to maximize the benefit of potential programs for EDC and tailor interventions accordingly. METHODS: Four focus group interviews with 28 informal caregivers of people with dementia (PwD) were analyzed using inductive content analysis. Both EDC and caregivers in the later stages were included to compare perceived EDC needs from different points in the caregiver career. RESULTS: Four themes were identified: the early-stage needs paradox, barriers in acceptance, facilitators in acceptance, and a transition from loss to adaptation. The retrospective view provided by later-stage caregivers differed from the view of EDC; EDC struggled with acknowledging needs due to fear of stigma and low acceptance. EDC stressed the importance of acceptance as a prerequisite for adequate adaptation, but were hindered by lack of knowledge, difficulty acknowledging changes, and focus on loss. In contrast, better understanding of the disease, increasing personal time, structuring ones day, and using appropriate humor can reduce negative communication, increase positive encounters and caregiver-confidence, contributing to positive interaction with the care recipient and an increase in well-being. CONCLUSIONS: Early therapeutic interventions could help caregivers identify their needs, increase knowledge about changes in roles and relationship reciprocity, and focus on enhancement of the positive, intact experiences to prevent caregiver burden.
BACKGROUND: Early individualized interventions for informal dementia caregivers can prevent overburdening in the later stages. However, the needs of early-stage dementia caregivers (EDC) remain largely unknown. This study aimed to explore the needs and wishes and need for care of EDC to maximize the benefit of potential programs for EDC and tailor interventions accordingly. METHODS: Four focus group interviews with 28 informal caregivers of people with dementia (PwD) were analyzed using inductive content analysis. Both EDC and caregivers in the later stages were included to compare perceived EDC needs from different points in the caregiver career. RESULTS: Four themes were identified: the early-stage needs paradox, barriers in acceptance, facilitators in acceptance, and a transition from loss to adaptation. The retrospective view provided by later-stage caregivers differed from the view of EDC; EDC struggled with acknowledging needs due to fear of stigma and low acceptance. EDC stressed the importance of acceptance as a prerequisite for adequate adaptation, but were hindered by lack of knowledge, difficulty acknowledging changes, and focus on loss. In contrast, better understanding of the disease, increasing personal time, structuring ones day, and using appropriate humor can reduce negative communication, increase positive encounters and caregiver-confidence, contributing to positive interaction with the care recipient and an increase in well-being. CONCLUSIONS: Early therapeutic interventions could help caregivers identify their needs, increase knowledge about changes in roles and relationship reciprocity, and focus on enhancement of the positive, intact experiences to prevent caregiver burden.
Authors: Nicole E Werner; Barbara Stanislawski; Katherine A Marx; Daphne C Watkins; Marissa Kobayashi; Helen Kales; Laura N Gitlin Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2017-02-22 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Sarah M Bannon; Victoria A Grunberg; Heena R Manglani; Ethan G Lester; Christine Ritchie; Ana-Maria Vranceanu Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2022-04-18 Impact factor: 7.538
Authors: Rachel A Rutkowski; Siddarth Ponnala; Laura Younan; Dustin T Weiler; Andrea Gilmore Bykovskyi; Nicole E Werner Journal: Int J Med Inform Date: 2020-11-12 Impact factor: 4.046
Authors: Rosalia J M van Knippenberg; Marjolein E de Vugt; Rudolf W Ponds; Inez Myin-Germeys; Frans R J Verhey Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2016-05-11 Impact factor: 3.630
Authors: Lizzy Mm Boots; Marjolein E de Vugt; Claudia Mj Smeets; Gertrudis Ijm Kempen; Frans Rj Verhey Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2017-12-19 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Alieske E H Dam; Martin P J van Boxtel; Nico Rozendaal; Frans R J Verhey; Marjolein E de Vugt Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-09-08 Impact factor: 3.240