| Literature DB >> 25566179 |
Martha V Douglas-Escobar1, Shelley C Heaton2, Jeffrey Bennett3, Linda J Young4, Olena Glushakova5, Xiaohui Xu6, Daphna Yasova Barbeau7, Candice Rossignol7, Cindy Miller7, Alissa M Old Crow3, Ronald L Hayes5, Michael D Weiss7.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We examined two potential biomarkers of brain damage in hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) neonates: glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP; a marker of gliosis) and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1; a marker of neuronal injury). We hypothesized that the biomarkers would be measurable in cord blood of healthy neonates and could serve as a normative reference for brain injury in HIE infants. We further hypothesized that higher levels would be detected in serum samples of HIE neonates and would correlate with brain damage on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and later developmental outcomes.? STUDYEntities:
Keywords: GFAP; HIE; UCH-L1; biomarkers
Year: 2014 PMID: 25566179 PMCID: PMC4271579 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2014.00273
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.003
The patient demographics of the 16 subjects with HIE are shown.
| Gestational age | 38 ± 2 weeks |
|---|---|
| Transferred | 44% |
| NRFHT | 55% |
| 5 min | 2 ± 2 |
| 10 min | 3 ± 2 |
| Intubation in DR | 81% |
| Cord pH | 6.98 ± 0.16 |
| Base deficit | −18 ± 6 |
| Moderate | 41% |
| Severe | 58% |
| Inotropic support | 50% |
| EEG seizures | 19% |
Figure 1The serum concentrations of UCH-L1 (A) and GFAP (B) in neonates with HIE are compared with control neonates. Increased serum levels of UCH-L1 at 0–6 h in HIE patients (n = 4) compared with controls (n = 11), p < 0.0001. The serum concentration of GFAP did not differ statistically from the control population.
Demographic and key medical variables in a prospective sample of HIE neonates treated with hypothermia who had serial biomarker samples obtained and formal developmental follow-up.
| Patient | Biomarker profile | Neurodevelopmental outcome | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCHL (ng/ml) | GFAP (ng/ml) | (Bayley-III assessment) | |||||||||
| 0–6 h | 12 h | 24 h | 0–6 h | 12 h | 24 h | Age (months) | Cognitive | Language | Motor | Outcome | |
| Subject 1 | 141.71 | – | 10 | 0.2 | – | 0.06 | 9.9 | 130 | 106 | 82 | Poor |
| Subject 2 | – | – | 1.792 | 0 | – | NA | 10 | 135 | 121 | 100 | Good |
| Subject 3 | 17.82 | 2.281 | 2.308 | 0 | 0.09 | 0.1 | 9.7 | 105 | 100 | 94 | Good |
| Subject 4 | – | – | 1.296 | – | – | 0.03 | 5.5 | 145 | 91 | 79 | Poor |
| Subject 5 | – | 59.43 | – | – | 0.065 | – | 6.1 | 85 | 103 | 46 | Poor |
| Subject 6 | 66.18 | 36.65 | 15.96 | 0.501 | 0.369 | 0.218 | 4.8 | 85 | 83 | 82 | Poor |
Bayley-III index scores (scale mean = 100; SD = 15); –, samples were unavailable.
Figure 2Receiver–operator characteristic plots of UCH-L1 and GFAP at different time point in detecting HIE. Area under curve (AUC with 95% confidence interval) for UCH-L1 is 1.00, 0.83 (0.57–1.00), and 0.73 (0.51–0.94) for 0–6, 12, and 24 h, respectively. AUC (95% CI) for GFAP is 0.58 (0.15–1.00), 0.61 (0.33–0.88), and 0.64 (0.41–0.87) for 0–6, 12, and 24 h, respectively.
Figure 3The serum concentrations of UCH-L1 and GFAP in neonates with HIE are plotted over the time of sample collection. The serum concentrations are expressed as the mean ± SEM. The serum concentration of UCH-L1 decreased rapidly over the initial 24 h with the highest concentrations obtained at 0–6 h (A). The serum concentrations of GFAP increased over the 96 h of sampling (B).
Figure 4The serum concentrations of UCH-L1 (A) and GFAP (B) in neonates with HIE who had good (black boxes and lines) and poor developmental outcomes (gray boxes and lines) are plotted over the 96 h sampling period. The mean serum concentrations are represented by the line while the bar represents the minimum and maximum serum concentrations.