Anne E Rhodes1, Hong Lu2, Robin Skinner3. 1. Research Scientist, Suicide Studies Research Unit and the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario; Associate Professor, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario; Associate Professor, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario; Adjunct Scientist, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario. 2. Analyst, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario. 3. Senior Injury Epidemiologist, Injury Section, Health Surveillance and Epidemiology Division, Centre for Chronic Disease Prevention, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether emergency department (ED) presentations for suicide-related behaviours (SRBs) in boys and girls were identified as more clinically acute in the ED in the period after the regulatory warnings against prescribing antidepressants and during the global economic recession, and to characterize the medical severity of SRBs among boys and girls to aid surveillance activities. METHOD: Among Ontario boys and girls (aged 12 to 17 years) presenting to the ED with an incident (index) ED SRB event between fiscal years (FYs) 2002 to 2010, we compared the number of high (compared with lower) acuity events in FYs 2005 to 2010 to those in FYs 2002 to 2004. We described the SRB method by its acuity and tested the linearity of varying trends in the SRB method in boys and girls. RESULTS: In both boys and girls, high acuity events were 50% greater after FY 2004 than before, regardless of subsequent admission, and most common among boys and girls who self-poisoned. In girls, opposing linear trends before and after FY 2004 were observed in the proportion of self-poisonings and cut (or) pierce SRB methods. Throughout the study period, there was a linear decline in the proportion of boys presenting to the ED with other methods. CONCLUSIONS: The previously reported increase in hospital admissions after the warnings and during the recession is unlikely artifactual. An equivalent increase in high acuity events was also evident among those not subsequently admitted. The reasons for varying responses in boys and girls by SRB method warrant further study.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether emergency department (ED) presentations for suicide-related behaviours (SRBs) in boys and girls were identified as more clinically acute in the ED in the period after the regulatory warnings against prescribing antidepressants and during the global economic recession, and to characterize the medical severity of SRBs among boys and girls to aid surveillance activities. METHOD: Among Ontario boys and girls (aged 12 to 17 years) presenting to the ED with an incident (index) ED SRB event between fiscal years (FYs) 2002 to 2010, we compared the number of high (compared with lower) acuity events in FYs 2005 to 2010 to those in FYs 2002 to 2004. We described the SRB method by its acuity and tested the linearity of varying trends in the SRB method in boys and girls. RESULTS: In both boys and girls, high acuity events were 50% greater after FY 2004 than before, regardless of subsequent admission, and most common among boys and girls who self-poisoned. In girls, opposing linear trends before and after FY 2004 were observed in the proportion of self-poisonings and cut (or) pierce SRB methods. Throughout the study period, there was a linear decline in the proportion of boys presenting to the ED with other methods. CONCLUSIONS: The previously reported increase in hospital admissions after the warnings and during the recession is unlikely artifactual. An equivalent increase in high acuity events was also evident among those not subsequently admitted. The reasons for varying responses in boys and girls by SRB method warrant further study.
Authors: Anne E Rhodes; Jennifer Bethell; Julie Spence; Paul S Links; David L Streiner; R Liisa Jaakkimainen Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2008-05-29 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: D M Velting; D Shaffer; M S Gould; R Garfinkel; P Fisher; M Davies Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 1998-11 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Jeffrey Sapyta; David B Goldston; Alaattin Erkanli; Stephanie S Daniel; Nicole Heilbron; Andrew Mayfield; S Lyn Treadway Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2012-01-16
Authors: Anne E Rhodes; Saba Khan; Michael H Boyle; Christine Wekerle; Deborah Goodman; Lil Tonmyr; Jennifer Bethell; Bruce Leslie; Ian Manion Journal: Can J Public Health Date: 2012 May-Jun
Authors: Nicola Madge; Anthea Hewitt; Keith Hawton; Erik Jan de Wilde; Paul Corcoran; Sandor Fekete; Kees van Heeringen; Diego De Leo; Mette Ystgaard Journal: J Child Psychol Psychiatry Date: 2008-03-10 Impact factor: 8.982
Authors: Robert D Gibbons; C Hendricks Brown; Kwan Hur; Sue M Marcus; Dulal K Bhaumik; Joëlle A Erkens; Ron M C Herings; J John Mann Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Anne E Rhodes; Michael H Boyle; Jennifer Bethell; Christine Wekerle; Lil Tonmyr; Deborah Goodman; Bruce Leslie; Kelvin Lam; Ian Manion Journal: Child Abuse Negl Date: 2012-12-20
Authors: Ayal Schaffer; Mark Sinyor; Paul Kurdyak; Simone Vigod; Jitender Sareen; Catherine Reis; Diane Green; James Bolton; Anne Rhodes; Sophie Grigoriadis; John Cairney; Amy Cheung Journal: World Psychiatry Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 49.548
Authors: John L Oliffe; Mary T Kelly; Gabriela Gonzalez Montaner; Paul S Links; David Kealy; John S Ogrodniczuk Journal: Can J Psychiatry Date: 2021-03-15 Impact factor: 4.356
Authors: Diana Frasquilho; Margarida Gaspar Matos; Ferdinand Salonna; Diogo Guerreiro; Cláudia C Storti; Tânia Gaspar; José M Caldas-de-Almeida Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2016-02-03 Impact factor: 3.295