Anne McGrail1, Lisa Kelchner. 1. Lisa Kelchner, PhD, is an Associate Professor and Director of Graduate Studies, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Substandard oral fluid intake in poststroke patients receiving thickened liquids has been well documented; however, more recently, it has been reported in poststroke patients receiving thin liquids. Factors contributing to substandard fluid intake have been limited to the altered taste/texture of thickened beverages. The aim of this study was to determine if functional deficits poststroke based on admission Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores for expression, problem solving, memory, and eating as well as dysphagia severity predict oral fluid intake for poststroke patients regardless of liquid viscosity. A second aim was to determine if there is a significant difference in the amount of oral fluids offered and consumed between patients receiving thin liquids and patients receiving thickened liquids. METHODS:Thirty-nine patients with a new diagnosis of ischemic stroke participated. Patients were assigned to one of two groups based on the consistency of liquids they were receiving: group 1, 21 receiving thin liquids, and group 2, 18 receiving nectar or honey consistency. Fluids offered and consumed were monitored for 72 consecutive hours. Admission FIM scores and dysphagia severity ratings were collected. RESULTS:Functional deficits in eating significantly predicted oral fluid intake in the thin-liquid group (p = .0575), whereas functional deficits in cognition (memory and problem solving) significantly predicted oral fluid intake in the thickened-liquid group (p = .0037). Patients receiving thin liquids consumed significantly more than patients receiving thickened liquids (mean = 1,405.45 ml and SD = ±727.1 ml vs. mean = 906.58 ml and SD = ±317.4 ml; p = .0031); however, they were also offered significantly more fluids (mean = 2,574.7 ml vs. 1,588.9 ml, p = .0002). CONCLUSIONS: On average, poststroke patients consume substandard amount of fluid during hospitalization, regardless of viscosity. Although patients receiving thin liquids consumed significantly more, they were offered, on average, approximately 1,000 ml more fluids per 24-hour period than the thickened-liquid group. Functional deficits after stroke influence oral fluid intake and should be considered as potential barriers to fluid intake for poststroke patients.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: Substandard oral fluid intake in poststroke patients receiving thickened liquids has been well documented; however, more recently, it has been reported in poststroke patients receiving thin liquids. Factors contributing to substandard fluid intake have been limited to the altered taste/texture of thickened beverages. The aim of this study was to determine if functional deficits poststroke based on admission Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores for expression, problem solving, memory, and eating as well as dysphagia severity predict oral fluid intake for poststroke patients regardless of liquid viscosity. A second aim was to determine if there is a significant difference in the amount of oral fluids offered and consumed between patients receiving thin liquids and patients receiving thickened liquids. METHODS: Thirty-nine patients with a new diagnosis of ischemic stroke participated. Patients were assigned to one of two groups based on the consistency of liquids they were receiving: group 1, 21 receiving thin liquids, and group 2, 18 receiving nectar or honey consistency. Fluids offered and consumed were monitored for 72 consecutive hours. Admission FIM scores and dysphagia severity ratings were collected. RESULTS:Functional deficits in eating significantly predicted oral fluid intake in the thin-liquid group (p = .0575), whereas functional deficits in cognition (memory and problem solving) significantly predicted oral fluid intake in the thickened-liquid group (p = .0037). Patients receiving thin liquids consumed significantly more than patients receiving thickened liquids (mean = 1,405.45 ml and SD = ±727.1 ml vs. mean = 906.58 ml and SD = ±317.4 ml; p = .0031); however, they were also offered significantly more fluids (mean = 2,574.7 ml vs. 1,588.9 ml, p = .0002). CONCLUSIONS: On average, poststroke patients consume substandard amount of fluid during hospitalization, regardless of viscosity. Although patients receiving thin liquids consumed significantly more, they were offered, on average, approximately 1,000 ml more fluids per 24-hour period than the thickened-liquid group. Functional deficits after stroke influence oral fluid intake and should be considered as potential barriers to fluid intake for poststroke patients.