Literature DB >> 25565198

A practical approach to determine dose metrics for nanomaterials.

Christiaan J E Delmaar1, Willie J G M Peijnenburg, Agnes G Oomen, Jingwen Chen, Wim H de Jong, Adriënne J A M Sips, Zhuang Wang, Margriet V D Z Park.   

Abstract

Traditionally, administered mass is used to describe doses of conventional chemical substances in toxicity studies. For deriving toxic doses of nanomaterials, mass and chemical composition alone may not adequately describe the dose, because particles with the same chemical composition can have completely different toxic mass doses depending on properties such as particle size. Other dose metrics such as particle number, volume, or surface area have been suggested, but consensus is lacking. The discussion regarding the most adequate dose metric for nanomaterials clearly needs a systematic, unbiased approach to determine the most appropriate dose metric for nanomaterials. In the present study, the authors propose such an approach and apply it to results from in vitro and in vivo experiments with silver and silica nanomaterials. The proposed approach is shown to provide a convenient tool to systematically investigate and interpret dose metrics of nanomaterials. Recommendations for study designs aimed at investigating dose metrics are provided.
© 2015 SETAC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dose metrics; Dose-response modeling; Nanomaterials; Nanoparticles; Risk assessment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25565198     DOI: 10.1002/etc.2878

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem        ISSN: 0730-7268            Impact factor:   3.742


  7 in total

Review 1.  Minimum information reporting in bio-nano experimental literature.

Authors:  Matthew Faria; Mattias Björnmalm; Kristofer J Thurecht; Stephen J Kent; Robert G Parton; Maria Kavallaris; Angus P R Johnston; J Justin Gooding; Simon R Corrie; Ben J Boyd; Pall Thordarson; Andrew K Whittaker; Molly M Stevens; Clive A Prestidge; Christopher J H Porter; Wolfgang J Parak; Thomas P Davis; Edmund J Crampin; Frank Caruso
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 39.213

Review 2.  A Systematic Review on the Hazard Assessment of Amorphous Silica Based on the Literature From 2013 to 2018.

Authors:  Harald F Krug
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-06-15

3.  In vivo Mammalian Alkaline Comet Assay: Method Adapted for Genotoxicity Assessment of Nanomaterials.

Authors:  Renato Cardoso; Maria Dusinska; Andrew Collins; Mugimane Manjanatha; Stefan Pfuhler; Marilyn Registre; Rosalie Elespuru
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2022-05-30

4.  Towards sensible toxicity testing for nanomaterials: proposal for the specification of test design.

Authors:  Annegret Potthoff; Mirco Weil; Tobias Meißner; Dana Kühnel
Journal:  Sci Technol Adv Mater       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 8.090

5.  Environmental Risk Assessment Strategy for Nanomaterials.

Authors:  Janeck J Scott-Fordsmand; Willie J G M Peijnenburg; Elena Semenzin; Bernd Nowack; Neil Hunt; Danail Hristozov; Antonio Marcomini; Muhammad-Adeel Irfan; Araceli Sánchez Jiménez; Robert Landsiedel; Lang Tran; Agnes G Oomen; Peter M J Bos; Kerstin Hund-Rinke
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  ToxTracker Reporter Cell Lines as a Tool for Mechanism-Based (geno)Toxicity Screening of Nanoparticles-Metals, Oxides and Quantum Dots.

Authors:  Sarah McCarrick; Francesca Cappellini; Amanda Kessler; Nynke Moelijker; Remco Derr; Jonas Hedberg; Susanna Wold; Eva Blomberg; Inger Odnevall Wallinder; Giel Hendriks; Hanna L Karlsson
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 5.076

7.  A Novel Experimental and Modelling Strategy for Nanoparticle Toxicity Testing Enabling the Use of Small Quantities.

Authors:  Marinda van Pomeren; Willie J G M Peijnenburg; Nadja R Brun; Martina G Vijver
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.