Literature DB >> 25564966

Toward a benchmarking data set able to evaluate ligand- and structure-based virtual screening using public HTS data.

Martin Lindh1, Fredrik Svensson, Wesley Schaal, Jin Zhang, Christian Sköld, Peter Brandt, Anders Karlén.   

Abstract

Virtual screening has the potential to accelerate and reduce costs of probe development and drug discovery. To develop and benchmark virtual screening methods, validation data sets are commonly used. Over the years, such data sets have been constructed to overcome the problems of analogue bias and artificial enrichment. With the rapid growth of public domain databases containing high-throughput screening data, such as the PubChem BioAssay database, there is an increased possibility to use such data for validation. In this study, we identify PubChem data sets suitable for validation of both structure- and ligand-based virtual screening methods. To achieve this, high-throughput screening data for which a crystal structure of the bioassay target was available in the PDB were identified. Thereafter, the data sets were inspected to identify structures and data suitable for use in validation studies. In this work, we present seven data sets (MMP13, DUSP3, PTPN22, EPHX2, CTDSP1, MAPK10, and CDK5) compiled using this method. In the seven data sets, the number of active compounds varies between 19 and 369 and the number of inactive compounds between 59 405 and 337 634. This gives a higher ratio of the number of inactive to active compounds than what is found in most benchmark data sets. We have also evaluated the screening performance using docking and 3D shape similarity with default settings. To characterize the data sets, we used physicochemical similarity and 2D fingerprint searches. We envision that these data sets can be a useful complement to current data sets used for method evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25564966     DOI: 10.1021/ci5005465

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  10 in total

1.  Rescoring of docking poses under Occam's Razor: are there simpler solutions?

Authors:  Michael Zhenin; Malkeet Singh Bahia; Gilles Marcou; Alexandre Varnek; Hanoch Senderowitz; Dragos Horvath
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 2.  Getting the most out of PubChem for virtual screening.

Authors:  Sunghwan Kim
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Discov       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 6.098

3.  In Silico Exploration for Novel Type-I Inhibitors of Tie-2/TEK: The Performance of Different Selection Strategy in Selecting Virtual Screening Candidates.

Authors:  Peichen Pan; Huiyong Sun; Hui Liu; Dan Li; Wenfang Zhou; Xiaotian Kong; Youyong Li; Huidong Yu; Tingjun Hou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Quantitative Structure-activity Relationship (QSAR) Models for Docking Score Correction.

Authors:  Yoshifumi Fukunishi; Satoshi Yamasaki; Isao Yasumatsu; Koh Takeuchi; Takashi Kurosawa; Haruki Nakamura
Journal:  Mol Inform       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 3.353

5.  Efficient iterative virtual screening with Apache Spark and conformal prediction.

Authors:  Laeeq Ahmed; Valentin Georgiev; Marco Capuccini; Salman Toor; Wesley Schaal; Erwin Laure; Ola Spjuth
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 5.514

6.  Prediction of Protein-compound Binding Energies from Known Activity Data: Docking-score-based Method and its Applications.

Authors:  Yoshifumi Fukunishi; Yasunobu Yamashita; Tadaaki Mashimo; Haruki Nakamura
Journal:  Mol Inform       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 3.353

Review 7.  Benchmarking Data Sets from PubChem BioAssay Data: Current Scenario and Room for Improvement.

Authors:  Viet-Khoa Tran-Nguyen; Didier Rognan
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Discovery of Potent Disheveled/Dvl Inhibitors Using Virtual Screening Optimized With NMR-Based Docking Performance Index.

Authors:  Kiminori Hori; Kasumi Ajioka; Natsuko Goda; Asako Shindo; Maki Takagishi; Takeshi Tenno; Hidekazu Hiroaki
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 5.810

9.  VB-MK-LMF: fusion of drugs, targets and interactions using variational Bayesian multiple kernel logistic matrix factorization.

Authors:  Bence Bolgár; Péter Antal
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 10.  Targeting the C-Terminal Domain Small Phosphatase 1.

Authors:  Harikrishna Reddy Rallabandi; Palanivel Ganesan; Young Jun Kim
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-08
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.