BACKGROUND: In response to the overdose epidemic, a network of support groups for family members in Massachusetts has been providing overdose education and naloxone rescue kits (OEN). The aims of this study were to describe the characteristics, motivations, and benefits of family members who receive OEN and to describe the frequency of naloxone used during an overdose rescue. METHODS: This cross-sectional, multisite study surveyed attendees of community support groups for family members of opioid users where OEN training was offered using a 42-item self-administered survey that included demographics, relationship to the individual using opioids, experience with overdose, motivations to receive OEN, and naloxone rescue kit use. RESULTS: Of 126 attendees who completed surveys at 8 sites, most attendees were white (95%), female (78%), married or partnered (74%), parents of an individual using opioids (85%), and providing financial support for the individual using opioids (52%). The OEN trainees (79%) were more likely than attendees not trained (21%) to be parents of an individual using opioids (91% vs. 65%, P < .05), to provide financial support to an individual using opioids (58% vs. 30%, P < .05), and to have witnessed an overdose (35% vs. 12%, P = .07). The major motivations to receive training were wanting a kit in their home (72%), education provided at the meeting (60%), and hearing about benefits from others (57%). Sixteen parents reported witnessing their child overdose, and 5 attendees had used naloxone successfully during an overdose rescue. CONCLUSIONS: Support groups for families of people who use opioids are promising venues to conduct overdose prevention trainings because attendees are motivated to receive training and will use naloxone to rescue people when witnessing an overdose. Further study is warranted to understand how to optimize this approach to overdose prevention in the community setting.
BACKGROUND: In response to the overdose epidemic, a network of support groups for family members in Massachusetts has been providing overdose education and naloxone rescue kits (OEN). The aims of this study were to describe the characteristics, motivations, and benefits of family members who receive OEN and to describe the frequency of naloxone used during an overdose rescue. METHODS: This cross-sectional, multisite study surveyed attendees of community support groups for family members of opioid users where OEN training was offered using a 42-item self-administered survey that included demographics, relationship to the individual using opioids, experience with overdose, motivations to receive OEN, and naloxone rescue kit use. RESULTS: Of 126 attendees who completed surveys at 8 sites, most attendees were white (95%), female (78%), married or partnered (74%), parents of an individual using opioids (85%), and providing financial support for the individual using opioids (52%). The OEN trainees (79%) were more likely than attendees not trained (21%) to be parents of an individual using opioids (91% vs. 65%, P < .05), to provide financial support to an individual using opioids (58% vs. 30%, P < .05), and to have witnessed an overdose (35% vs. 12%, P = .07). The major motivations to receive training were wanting a kit in their home (72%), education provided at the meeting (60%), and hearing about benefits from others (57%). Sixteen parents reported witnessing their childoverdose, and 5 attendees had used naloxone successfully during an overdose rescue. CONCLUSIONS: Support groups for families of people who use opioids are promising venues to conduct overdose prevention trainings because attendees are motivated to receive training and will use naloxone to rescue people when witnessing an overdose. Further study is warranted to understand how to optimize this approach to overdose prevention in the community setting.
Authors: Corey S Davis; Sarah Ruiz; Patrick Glynn; Gerald Picariello; Alexander Y Walley Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2014-06-12 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Christine M Wilder; Fred Wells Brason; Angela K Clark; Marc Galanter; Alexander Y Walley; Erin L Winstanley Journal: J Addict Med Date: 2014 May-Jun Impact factor: 3.702
Authors: Karla D Wagner; Peter J Davidson; Ellen Iverson; Rachel Washburn; Emily Burke; Alex H Kral; Miles McNeeley; Jennifer Jackson Bloom; Stephen E Lankenau Journal: Int J Drug Policy Date: 2013-08-09
Authors: Alexander Y Walley; Ziming Xuan; H Holly Hackman; Emily Quinn; Maya Doe-Simkins; Amy Sorensen-Alawad; Sarah Ruiz; Al Ozonoff Journal: BMJ Date: 2013-01-30
Authors: Benjamin Levy; Bridget Spelke; Leonard J Paulozzi; Jeneita M Bell; Kurt B Nolte; Sarah Lathrop; David E Sugerman; Michael Landen Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2016-08-03 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Barbara Lovrecic; Mercedes Lovrecic; Branko Gabrovec; Marco Carli; Matteo Pacini; Angelo G I Maremmani; Icro Maremmani Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-01-09 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Jessica L Taylor; Samantha Johnson; Ricardo Cruz; Jessica R Gray; Davida Schiff; Sarah M Bagley Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2021-06-22 Impact factor: 5.128