Literature DB >> 25564877

Influence of active layer and support layer surface structures on organic fouling propensity of thin-film composite forward osmosis membranes.

Xinglin Lu1, Laura H Arias Chavez, Santiago Romero-Vargas Castrillón, Jun Ma, Menachem Elimelech.   

Abstract

In this study, we investigate the influence of surface structure on the fouling propensity of thin-film composite (TFC) forward osmosis (FO) membranes. Specifically, we compare membranes fabricated through identical procedures except for the use of different solvents (dimethylformamide, DMF and N-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone, NMP) during phase separation. FO fouling experiments were carried out with a feed solution containing a model organic foulant. The TFC membranes fabricated using NMP (NMP-TFC) had significantly less flux decline (7.47 ± 0.15%) when compared to the membranes fabricated using DMF (DMF-TFC, 12.70 ± 2.62% flux decline). Water flux was also more easily recovered through physical cleaning for the NMP-TFC membrane. To determine the fundamental cause of these differences in fouling propensity, the active and support layers of the membranes were extensively characterized for physical and chemical characteristics relevant to fouling behavior. Polyamide surface roughness was found to dominate all other investigated factors in determining the fouling propensities of our membranes relative to each other. The high roughness polyamide surface of the DMF-TFC membrane was also rich in larger leaf-like structures, whereas the lower roughness NMP-TFC membrane polyamide layer contained more nodular and smaller features. The support layers of the two membrane types were also characterized for their morphological properties, and the relation between support layer surface structure and polyamide active layer formation was discussed. Taken together, our findings indicate that support layer structure has a significant impact on the fouling propensity of the active layer, and this impact should be considered in the design of support layer structures for TFC membranes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25564877     DOI: 10.1021/es5044062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  6 in total

1.  In Situ Chemical Modification with Zwitterionic Copolymers of Nanofiltration Membranes: Cure for the Trade-Off between Filtration and Antifouling Performance.

Authors:  Xinyu Zhang; Jiayu Tian; Ruiyang Xu; Xiaoxiang Cheng; Xuewu Zhu; Ching Yoong Loh; Kaifang Fu; Ruidong Zhang; Daoji Wu; Huixue Ren; Ming Xie
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 10.383

Review 2.  Progress and Prospects of Nanocellulose-Based Membranes for Desalination and Water Treatment.

Authors:  Asif Saud; Haleema Saleem; Syed Javaid Zaidi
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-25

3.  Dopamine incorporating forward osmosis membranes with enhanced selectivity and antifouling properties.

Authors:  Yi Wang; Zhendong Fang; Shuaifei Zhao; Derrick Ng; Juan Zhang; Zongli Xie
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 3.361

4.  Designing ultrathin film composite membranes: the impact of a gutter layer.

Authors:  Moon Kattula; Koushik Ponnuru; Lingxiang Zhu; Weiguang Jia; Haiqing Lin; Edward P Furlani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Thin Film Composite Forward Osmosis Membrane with Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes Interlayer for Alleviating Internal Concentration Polarization.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Tang; Shan Li; Jia Xu; Congjie Gao
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 4.329

6.  New Facility for Membrane Fouling Investigations under Customizable Hydrodynamics: Validation and Preliminary Experiments with Pulsating Cross-Flow.

Authors:  Roberto Bert; Costantino Manes; Alberto Tiraferri
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.