Sara Kalkhoran1, Rachel A Grana2, Torsten B Neilands3, Pamela M Ling4. 1. Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. 2. Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. 3. Center for AIDS Prevention Studies, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. 4. Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. Pamela.ling@ucsf.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate predictors of dual use of cigarettes with smokeless tobacco or e-cigarettes. METHODS: Adult smokers (N = 1324) completed online cross-sectional surveys. Logistic regression evaluated predictors of dual use and cigarette quit attempts. RESULTS: Smokeless tobacco dual use was associated with past attempts to quit smoking by switching to smokeless products. E-cigarette dual use was associated with using stop-smoking medication and strong anti-tobacco industry attitudes. Ever use of stop-smoking medication was associated with quit attempts among dual e-cigarette users and cigarette-only users. CONCLUSIONS: Dual users are more likely than cigarette-only users to endorse certain cessation-related attitudes and behaviors. This may provide an opportunity for clinicians or others to discuss evidence-based strategies for smoking cessation.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate predictors of dual use of cigarettes with smokeless tobacco or e-cigarettes. METHODS: Adult smokers (N = 1324) completed online cross-sectional surveys. Logistic regression evaluated predictors of dual use and cigarette quit attempts. RESULTS: Smokeless tobacco dual use was associated with past attempts to quit smoking by switching to smokeless products. E-cigarette dual use was associated with using stop-smoking medication and strong anti-tobacco industry attitudes. Ever use of stop-smoking medication was associated with quit attempts among dual e-cigarette users and cigarette-only users. CONCLUSIONS: Dual users are more likely than cigarette-only users to endorse certain cessation-related attitudes and behaviors. This may provide an opportunity for clinicians or others to discuss evidence-based strategies for smoking cessation.
Authors: Mariann R Piano; Neal L Benowitz; Garret A Fitzgerald; Susan Corbridge; Janie Heath; Ellen Hahn; Terry F Pechacek; George Howard Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-09-13 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Jennifer L Pearson; Amanda Richardson; Raymond S Niaura; Donna M Vallone; David B Abrams Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2012-07-19 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Cristine D Delnevo; Daniel P Giovenco; Michael B Steinberg; Andrea C Villanti; Jennifer L Pearson; Raymond S Niaura; David B Abrams Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2015-11-02 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Eva Sharma; Kathryn C Edwards; Michael J Halenar; Kristie A Taylor; Karin A Kasza; Hannah Day; Lisa D Gardner; Gabriella Anic; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Jean Limpert; Hoda T Hammad; Nicolette Borek; Heather L Kimmel; Wilson M Compton; Andrew Hyland; Cassandra A Stanton Journal: Tob Control Date: 2020-05 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Allison N Kurti; Janice Y Bunn; Katherine Tang; Tyler Nighbor; Diann E Gaalema; Victoria Coleman-Cowger; Sulamunn R M Coleman; Stephen T Higgins Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2019-12-10 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Dorothy A Rhoades; Ashley L Comiford; Justin D Dvorak; Kai Ding; Leslie M Driskill; Audrea M Hopkins; Paul Spicer; Theodore L Wagener; Mark P Doescher Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Jessica L Burris; Amy E Wahlquist; Anthony J Alberg; K Michael Cummings; Kevin M Gray; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer; Matthew J Carpenter Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2016-07-15 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Alison Breland; Eric Soule; Alexa Lopez; Carolina Ramôa; Ahmad El-Hellani; Thomas Eissenberg Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci Date: 2016-01-15 Impact factor: 5.691