Literature DB >> 25564551

Incidence and characteristics of phrenic nerve palsy following pulmonary vein isolation with the second-generation as compared with the first-generation cryoballoon in 360 consecutive patients.

Alexander Fürnkranz1, Stefano Bordignon2, Boris Schmidt2, Laura Perrotta2, Daniela Dugo2, Manuel De Lazzari2, Britta Schulte-Hahn2, Bernd Nowak2, Julian K R Chun2.   

Abstract

AIMS: The second-generation cryoballoon (CB2) with increased surface cooling has recently become available. The aim was to investigate the incidence and characteristics of phrenic nerve palsy (PNP) during pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using the CB2 as compared with the first-generation balloon (CB1). METHODS AND
RESULTS: A total of 360 consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation underwent PVI with the CB1 (106 patients) or the CB2 (254 patients). Right PN function was monitored by continuous stimulation and palpation during septal PV ablation. Persistent PNP (present at discharge) occurred in 2.8 and 1.9% (P = 0.63) of patients, transient PNP (full recovery before discharge) in 5.9 and 3.8% (P = 0.41) of patients in the CB2 and CB1 group, respectively. Phrenic nerve palsy during ablation at the right inferior PV was observed in 0% (CB1) and 4.3% (CB2, P = 0.03) of patients. Using the CB2, a trend of reduced incidence of persistent PNP over quartiles of consecutive patients was observed [4.8% (Q1) vs. 0% (Q4); P = 0.077]. At the culprit PV, PNP occurred after 3.5 ± 2.1 (CB1) and 1.1 ± 0.4 applications (CB2; P = 0.036). Complete recovery of PN function occurred after 29 ± 11 (CB1) and 259 ± 137 days (CB2; P = 0.004).
CONCLUSIONS: The rate of transient/persistent PNP associated with the use of the CB2 was 5.9 and 2.8%, respectively. Time to restitution of PN function was longer using the CB2. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author 2015. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ablation; Arrhythmia; Atrial fibrillation; Balloon; Phrenic nerve

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25564551     DOI: 10.1093/europace/euu320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  19 in total

Review 1.  [Catheter ablation and the complications].

Authors:  D Steven; J H van den Bruck; T Plenge; J Lüker; A Sultan
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2015-12

Review 2.  [Pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation : Findings from long-term follow-up].

Authors:  C-H Heeger; K-H Kuck; F Ouyang
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.443

3.  Using anatomical landmark to avoid phrenic nerve injury during balloon-based procedures in atrial fibrillation patients.

Authors:  Nicolina M Smith; Larry Segars; Travis Kauffman; Anthony B Olinger
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  Practical Techniques in Cryoballoon Ablation: How to Isolate Inferior Pulmonary Veins.

Authors:  Shaojie Chen; Boris Schmidt; Stefano Bordignon; Fabrizio Bologna; Takahiko Nagase; Laura Perrotta; K R Julian Chun
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2018-03

5.  Efficacy, High Procedural Safety And Rapid Optimization Of Cryoballoon Atrial Fibrillation Ablation In The Hands Of A New Operator.

Authors:  Eberhard Scholz; Patrick Lugenbiel; Patrick A Schweizer; Panagiotis Xynogalos; Claudia Seyler; Edgar Zitron; Rüdiger Becker; Hugo A Katus; Dierk Thomas
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2016-02-29

6.  Long-Term Evolution of Patients Treated for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation with First and Second Generation Cryoballoon Catheter Ablation with a Prospective Protocol Guided by Complete Bidirectional Left Atrium-Pulmonary Veins Disconnection after Adenosine as Main Target end Point to achieved. Seven Years Follow-up of Patients with a rough estimation profile of Low ALARMEc Score. A Single Center Report.

Authors:  Jesus M Paylos; Aracelis Morales; Luis Azcona; Marisol Paradela; Raquel Yagüe; Fernando Gómez-Guijarro; Lourdes Lacal; R N Clara Ferrero; Octavio Rodríguez
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2016-04-30

7.  Pulmonary Vein Isolation Using the Visually Guided Laser Balloon: Results of the U.S. Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Srinivas R Dukkipati; Ian Woollett; H Thomas McELDERRY; Marie-Christine Böhmer; Shephal K Doshi; Edward P Gerstenfeld; Rodney Horton; Andre D'Avila; David E Haines; Miguel Valderrabano; J Michael Mangrum; Jeremy N Ruskin; Andrea Natale; Vivek Y Reddy
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-08-10

Review 8.  The Hot and the Cold: Radiofrequency Versus Cryoballoon Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Richard Ang; Giulia Domenichini; Malcolm C Finlay; Richard J Schilling; Ross J Hunter
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 9.  Safety and efficacy of second-generation versus first-generation cryoballoons for treatment of atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of current evidence.

Authors:  Bhavi Pandya; Azfar Sheikh; Jonathan Spagnola; Soad Bekheit; James Lafferty; Marcin Kowalski
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 1.900

10.  Bonus vs No Bonus Cryoballoon Isolation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Ablation.

Authors:  Aysenur Ekizler; Dursun Aras; Serkan Cay; Ozcan Ozeke; Firat Ozcan; Serkan Topaloglu
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2017-02-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.