Literature DB >> 25564314

Cost of status epilepticus: A systematic review.

Lena-Marie Kortland1, Susanne Knake1, Felix Rosenow1, Adam Strzelczyk2.   

Abstract

The objective of this review is to give an overview of published cost of illness (COI) studies on status epilepticus (SE). For identifying COI studies that evaluated the direct and indirect costs of SE, a systematic literature review was performed. We used a standardized assessment form for extracting information on the study design, methodological framework, and data sources from each publication. The results were systematically reported. We identified only two studies worldwide, which included prevalence- or incidence-based data on the direct costs of SE: one from Germany and one from the USA. Both used a bottom-up approach and a prospective design. The estimated mean inpatient costs summed up to US$18,834 in the USA and to €8347 in Germany per admission with an average length of stay of 12.9 and 14.0 days. The mean annual direct costs for SE had been estimated at US$4 billion in the USA and at €83 million (adults only) in Germany. Both available studies indicate that SE is a cost-intensive disorder with an acute CNS aetiology as a cost-driving factor. In conclusion, there is a paucity of data on the costs of SE. Further studies are warranted to determine costs, its predictors, quality of life, mortality data due to SE and its sequelae and to provide a basis for further cost-effectiveness calculations for new drugs and other interventions in SE and prolonged seizures.
Copyright © 2014 British Epilepsy Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Costs; Economic burden; Epilepsy; Prolonged seizures; Status epilepticus

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25564314     DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2014.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Seizure        ISSN: 1059-1311            Impact factor:   3.184


  8 in total

1.  [Impact of early benefit assessment on patients with epilepsy in Germany: Current healthcare provision and therapeutic needs].

Authors:  A Strzelczyk; H M Hamer
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 2.  The efficacy of lacosamide as monotherapy and adjunctive therapy in focal epilepsy and its use in status epilepticus: clinical trial evidence and experience.

Authors:  Sebastian Bauer; Laurent M Willems; Esther Paule; Christine Petschow; Johann Philipp Zöllner; Felix Rosenow; Adam Strzelczyk
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 6.570

Review 3.  Levetiracetam for Status Epilepticus in Adults: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Carly A Webb; Richard Wanbon; Erica D Otto
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2022

Review 4.  Status Epilepticus: Epidemiology and Public Health Needs.

Authors:  Sebastián Sánchez; Fred Rincon
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  The Burden of Severely Drug-Refractory Epilepsy: A Comparative Longitudinal Evaluation of Mortality, Morbidity, Resource Use, and Cost Using German Health Insurance Data.

Authors:  Adam Strzelczyk; Claudia Griebel; Wolfram Lux; Felix Rosenow; Jens-Peter Reese
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 4.003

6.  Epilepsy emergency rescue training.

Authors:  Rohit Shankar; Caryn Jory; Juliet Ashton; Brendan McLean; Matthew Walker
Journal:  BMJ Qual Improv Rep       Date:  2015-06-12

7.  Socioeconomic Outcome and Quality of Life in Adults after Status Epilepticus: A Multicenter, Longitudinal, Matched Case-Control Analysis from Germany.

Authors:  Lena-Marie Kortland; Susanne Knake; Felix von Podewils; Felix Rosenow; Adam Strzelczyk
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  Long-term outcomes of status epilepticus: A critical assessment.

Authors:  Claudine Sculier; Marina Gaínza-Lein; Iván Sánchez Fernández; Tobias Loddenkemper
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2018-08-26       Impact factor: 5.864

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.