Literature DB >> 25564128

Real-time measurements of airborne biologic particles using fluorescent particle counter to evaluate microbial contamination: results of a comparative study in an operating theater.

Chunyang Dai1, Yan Zhang2, Xiaoling Ma3, Meiling Yin2, Haiyang Zheng4, Xuejun Gu4, Shaoqing Xie4, Hengmin Jia5, Liang Zhang5, Weijun Zhang4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Airborne bacterial contamination poses a risk for surgical site infection, and routine surveillance of airborne bacteria is important. Traditional methods for detecting airborne bacteria are time consuming and strenuous. Measurement of biologic particle concentrations using a fluorescent particle counter is a novel method for evaluating air quality. The current study was to determine whether the number of biologic particles detected by the fluorescent particle counter can be used to indicate airborne bacterial counts in operating rooms.
METHODS: The study was performed in an operating theater at a university hospital in Hefei, China. The number of airborne biologic particles every minute was quantified using a fluorescent particle counter. Microbiologic air sampling was performed every 30 minutes using an Andersen air sampler (Pusong Electronic Instruments, Changzhou, China). Correlations between the 2 different methods were analyzed by Pearson correlation coefficients.
RESULTS: A significant correlation was observed between biologic particle and bacterial counts (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.76), and the counting results from 2 methods both increased substantially between operations, corresponding with human movements in the operating room.
CONCLUSION: Fluorescent particle counters show potential as important tools for monitoring bacterial contamination in operating theatres.
Copyright © 2015 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anderson air sampler; Bacterial count; Biologic particle number; Fluorescent particle counter; Monitoring airborne bacteria

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25564128     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2014.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Infect Control        ISSN: 0196-6553            Impact factor:   2.918


  6 in total

1.  The first microbial environment of infants born by C-section: the operating room microbes.

Authors:  Hakdong Shin; Zhiheng Pei; Keith A Martinez; Juana I Rivera-Vinas; Keimari Mendez; Humberto Cavallin; Maria G Dominguez-Bello
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 14.650

Review 2.  Microorganisms in Confined Habitats: Microbial Monitoring and Control of Intensive Care Units, Operating Rooms, Cleanrooms and the International Space Station.

Authors:  Maximilian Mora; Alexander Mahnert; Kaisa Koskinen; Manuela R Pausan; Lisa Oberauner-Wappis; Robert Krause; Alexandra K Perras; Gregor Gorkiewicz; Gabriele Berg; Christine Moissl-Eichinger
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 5.640

3.  Factors influencing microbial colonies in the air of operating rooms.

Authors:  Ling Fu Shaw; Ian Horng Chen; Chii Shya Chen; Hui Hsin Wu; Li Shing Lai; Yin Yin Chen; Fu Der Wang
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 3.090

4.  A Clinical Test to Measure Airborne Microbial Contamination on the Sterile Field During Total Joint Replacement: Method, Reference Values, and Pilot Study.

Authors:  John H Harp
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2018-08-24

Review 5.  Current and potential approaches on assessing airflow and particle dispersion in healthcare facilities: a systematic review.

Authors:  Huiyi Tan; Keng Yinn Wong; Mohd Hafiz Dzarfan Othman; Hong Yee Kek; Roswanira Abdul Wahab; Garry Kuan Pei Ern; Wen Tong Chong; Kee Quen Lee
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 5.190

6.  An in-depth survey of the microbial landscape of the walls of a neonatal operating room.

Authors:  Dieunel Derilus; Filipa Godoy-Vitorino; Hebe Rosado; Edgardo Agosto; Maria Gloria Dominguez-Bello; Humberto Cavallin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.