Teresa Schreckenbach1, Patrizia Malkomes1, Wolf O Bechstein1, Guido Woeste1, Andreas A Schnitzbauer2,3, Frank Ulrich1. 1. Department of General and Abdominal Surgery, Frankfurt University Hospital, Goethe-University Frankfurt/Main, Frankfurt/Main, Germany. 2. Department of General and Abdominal Surgery, Frankfurt University Hospital, Goethe-University Frankfurt/Main, Frankfurt/Main, Germany. andreas.schnitzbauer@kgu.de. 3. Department of General and Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe-University Frankfurt/Main, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt/Main, Germany. andreas.schnitzbauer@kgu.de.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The clinical risk scores (CRSs) of Fong and Nordlinger are used to predict the outcome of patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs). This study investigated whether CRSs could predict the overall survival of patients with CRLM treated with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to resection. METHODS: Patients with CRLM undergoing liver resection were analyzed retrospectively. The primary outcome measure was overall survival with vs. without neoadjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: Between August 2002 and October 2011, 300 patients underwent liver resection for CRLMs at a large university hospital in Germany. Group A comprised 117 patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and group B comprised 71 patients who did not. The Fong score predicted overall survival for patients who did not receive chemotherapy (p = 0.02), but not for those treated with chemotherapy (p = 0.69). The Nordlinger score was not predictive for either of the groups (p = 0.71 vs. p = 0.08 for groups A and B, respectively). Subgroup analysis of the Nordlinger score identified better overall survival in the high-risk group treated with chemotherapy (p = 0.05). Multivariate analysis identified a resection margin of <1 cm [OR 0.622 (95% CI: 0.17-2.31); p = 0.044], age >60 years [OR 0.535 (95% CI: 0.16-1.77); p = 0.022] and number of metastases >4 [OR 0.189 (95% CI: 0.06-0.61); p = 0.018] as independent prognostic factors for overall survival. CONCLUSION: Thus, CRSs were not reliable prognostic tools for patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy before liver resection in this analysis.
PURPOSE: The clinical risk scores (CRSs) of Fong and Nordlinger are used to predict the outcome of patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs). This study investigated whether CRSs could predict the overall survival of patients with CRLM treated with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to resection. METHODS:Patients with CRLM undergoing liver resection were analyzed retrospectively. The primary outcome measure was overall survival with vs. without neoadjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: Between August 2002 and October 2011, 300 patients underwent liver resection for CRLMs at a large university hospital in Germany. Group A comprised 117 patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and group B comprised 71 patients who did not. The Fong score predicted overall survival for patients who did not receive chemotherapy (p = 0.02), but not for those treated with chemotherapy (p = 0.69). The Nordlinger score was not predictive for either of the groups (p = 0.71 vs. p = 0.08 for groups A and B, respectively). Subgroup analysis of the Nordlinger score identified better overall survival in the high-risk group treated with chemotherapy (p = 0.05). Multivariate analysis identified a resection margin of <1 cm [OR 0.622 (95% CI: 0.17-2.31); p = 0.044], age >60 years [OR 0.535 (95% CI: 0.16-1.77); p = 0.022] and number of metastases >4 [OR 0.189 (95% CI: 0.06-0.61); p = 0.018] as independent prognostic factors for overall survival. CONCLUSION: Thus, CRSs were not reliable prognostic tools for patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy before liver resection in this analysis.
Authors: Scott Kopetz; George J Chang; Michael J Overman; Cathy Eng; Daniel J Sargent; David W Larson; Axel Grothey; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; David M Nagorney; Robert R McWilliams Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-05-26 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Shishir K Maithel; Mithat Gönen; Hiromichi Ito; Ronald P Dematteo; Peter J Allen; Yuman Fong; Leslie H Blumgart; William R Jarnagin; Michael I D'Angelica Journal: Surgery Date: 2011-10-06 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Gunnar Folprecht; Thomas Gruenberger; Wolf O Bechstein; Hans-Rudolf Raab; Florian Lordick; Jörg T Hartmann; Hauke Lang; Andrea Frilling; Jan Stoehlmacher; Jürgen Weitz; Ralf Konopke; Christian Stroszczynski; Torsten Liersch; Detlev Ockert; Thomas Herrmann; Eray Goekkurt; Fabio Parisi; Claus-Henning Köhne Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2009-11-26 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Zaed Z R Hamady; J Peter A Lodge; Fenella K Welsh; Giles J Toogood; Alan White; Timothy John; Myrddin Rees Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Christoph Reissfelder; Nuh N Rahbari; Moritz Koch; Alexis Ulrich; Isabel Pfeilschifter; Anke Waltert; Sascha A Müller; Peter Schemmer; Markus W Büchler; Jürgen Weitz Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: B Nordlinger; E Van Cutsem; T Gruenberger; B Glimelius; G Poston; P Rougier; A Sobrero; M Ychou Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2009-01-19 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Emily K Elizabeth McCracken; Gregory P Samsa; Deborah A Fisher; Norma E Farrow; Karenia Landa; Kevin N Shah; Dan G Blazer; Sabino Zani Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2019-05-30 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Vinod P Balachandran; Arshi Arora; Mithat Gönen; Hiromichi Ito; Simon Turcotte; Jinru Shia; Agnes Viale; Nikol Snoeren; Sander R van Hooff; Inne H M Borel Rinkes; René Adam; T Peter Kingham; Peter J Allen; Ronald P DeMatteo; William R Jarnagin; Michael I D'Angelica Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2016-01-05 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: G Filippini Velázquez; S Schiele; M Gerken; S Neumaier; C Hackl; P Mayr; M Klinkhammer-Schalke; G Illerhaus; H J Schlitt; M Anthuber; T Kröncke; H Messmann; B Märkl; C Schmid; M Trepel; G Müller; R Claus; B Hackanson Journal: ESMO Open Date: 2022-04-20
Authors: Kerstin Wimmer; Christoph Schwarz; Carmen Szabo; Martin Bodingbauer; Dietmar Tamandl; Martina Mittlböck; Klaus Kaczirek Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2016-10-11 Impact factor: 5.344